by John C. Boyle
CO
During the period
of 1908 through 1911, the Siskiyou Electric Power and Light Company had extended
its holdings by acquisition of several smaller power properties in
In
early May 1910 the Siskiyou Electric Power and Light Company started surveys of
Ward's Canyon on the
The
survey headquarters were at William Lennox ranch where the Ager -
Surveys consisted of laying out a triangulation system, bench marks, level lines and contours sufficient to prepare maps which could be used for the purchase of lands and from which volumes of stored water at different elevations could be computed. Also it was necessary to establish on the ground the legal subdivision corners, property lines, fences, roads and buildings.
The
river bottomlands were covered with beautiful farms used mostly for cattle
raising. The homes and buildings were old but generally well kept.
The
river meandered throughout the area, slow flowing and deep until it reached the
canyon, where it became very rapid.
The soil was river silt, some subirrigated and some irrigated from numerous springs, dip wheels and inflow creeks.
It
would be necessary, if a dam were built at the head of Ward's Canyon to flood
practically all of those good farm lands.
The
people who lived on their farms were very reluctant to sell even though the
prices offered were somewhat high, but they realized that power development was
progress and use of electricity was rapidly becoming a public necessity.
The principal owners affected were:
William
Lennox Mary
Ward
George L. Chase
Henry
Keaton
William Raymundo
Maureza
Aquada Stone
and Edwards
Kitty
Ward
Henry and Herman Spannons Manuel
Crovelle
As part of the field work, measurements of the river flow were taken and a
gauging station was established at Ward's bridge at the lower or west end of the
proposed reservoir.
When the reservoir survey was finished, camp was moved from the
Ward's
Canyon, about two miles long, was noted on the County records as unsurveyable.
It was lined with bluffs, slides, boulders and inaccessible places. Rattlesnakes
were everywhere, and along the river's edge hundreds of beautiful sugar pine
logs were left from the river logging days of Klamathon.
During
May 1911, Ward's camp or camp No.3 on the Klamath River was established to start
work on Klamath River dam No. 1. Only a few men were there, living in tents with
an old barn for a cookhouse.
The
first location selected for a dam was at the head of Ward's Canyon where the
river broke over into swift water. It was also the place where Indian Jake (of
the Shasta Indians) used to sit by the hour to spear fish.
The
south abutment for a proposed dam looked perfect, but the north abutment looked
questionable. Drifts were run with shafts and open cuts as far as 130 feet under
ground and perpendicular to the river. The andesite from the south abutment ran
nearly across the river then started down at 20 degrees and 40 degrees deeper
and deeper. The material on top was talus of cinder, loose volcanic fragments
and boulders of basalt. The answer was clear. Any dam at this proposed site for
creating a reservoir would be questionable.
Work
was discontinued on
Because the
proposed project was so close to Fall Creek it was decided to proceed with
investigations, layout and design of the project. All this work was done on the
job.
Foundation
investigation and river diversion were started on "Klamath River Dam No.
1" in July 1911, and the prospecting work on another plant below of about
the same capacity was started on "Klamath River Dam No.2" at the same
time.
For
the purpose of obtaining detailed costs of the work as it progressed, some 40
sub- divisions into job numbers were made and an accounting setup on the job.
All bills were paid through the Yreka office, but payroll payoffs and emergency
small expenditures were made on the job.
10 hours on the job. Meals $.25: each deducted from pay.
No overtime pay.)
May
1911
May 1913
Laborers
$2.50 per day
Patrolmen $65.00 per mo
Drillers
$3.00 per day
Power House Operators $65.00 per mo.
Leadmen
$3.25 per day
Linemen $75.00 per mo.
Foremen
$4.00 per day
Electricians $ 3.50 per day
Boyle-$125.00
per month & board.
The area surrounding the project was a happy hunting
ground for the Indians, plenty of fish in the river and bountiful wildlife in
the lava canyons, especially in wintertime. Cats and birds of all kinds native
to the country were in abundance on the sunny slopes between the rim rocks.
Indian "Tom" (a Modoc), and Indian "Jake" (a Shasta)
did the fishing and most of the hunting. They lived with their squaws on Deer
Creek just upstream from the
Their stories about the caves on the north slope above
the railroad switchback where General Grant supposedly corraled the Indians with
his cannons and their stories of abuse by the white man were fascinating and
unbelievable.
Most of the other Indians in the neighborhood were mixed
bloods, such as the Keatons, Griffiths, Raymonds, Frains, and others.
Kitty Ward, a full-blood Indian, lived in a tall log
cabin which she and her white husband Tim built for a home. It was beautifully
located on the lower end of the proposed reservoir beside flowing springs ample
to irrigate some of the lands.
The cabin was below the flow line so when time to fill
the reservoir came, Kitty was told it was necessary for her to move. She
certainly knew how to put the white man in his place. Between sobs and tears,
she refused again and again to leave her home saying "I no move, let water
come, I die here." Tim had been dead for several years, but Andy Marlow, as
a ranch foreman and keeper of her wampum cooperated in getting Kitty to visit in
Hornbrook, a visit from which she never returned.
The area involved is shown on the outline map, Sheet
H-53. It was contemplated at the time that the Copco No.1 dam would be
constructed to create a reservoir, and that the power- house would be located at
the present Copco No.2 site.
As
a result of surveys, it was concluded that development of this project would
produce more power (50,000 KW) than could be absorbed for a long period of time
on the Company's system. Therefore the development was split into Copco No.1 and
Copco No.2.
The plan adopted for the development of Copco No.1 is
shown on the following drawings: Sheets H-54, H-18 and H-91. Foundation
investigations, consisting of tunnels, open cuts and diamond drill borings, were
started in the fall of 1911 and completed in the spring of 1912. The project is
described in an article written by J. C. Boyle for the Journal of
Electricity, Power and Gas under date of February 22,1913: Volume XXV, No.8;
and in the Yreka Journal, July 9, 1913.
Although the country surrounding the construction site is principally
basalt, and the walls of the canyon themselves vary to 250 feet in height in
lava, the river in its erosion had exposed a reef across the canyon at the
location of the dam, approximately 130 feet high. This reef of andesite was
apparently continuous for considerable distance on both sides of the canyon and
considered to be the oldest exposed formation in the
Geological conditions upstream from the site indicated that at one time the river ran over this reef, 130 feet above its present bed. During the time that the river was at this height
the water was backed up approximately 5 miles and formed a natural lake, which varied in width to a mile at the widest part.
It was proposed to fill this gorge made by the river in eroding the
reef, with a concrete dam, and cover the old original lake bottom with a new
artificial lake. The new lake would have a surface area of 1000 acres and would
have a catchment of 77,000 acre-feet. This would be the third lake on the course
of the
Two of the most interesting construction features of this
installation were the diversion of the river from its channel, and the
excavation in the river channel for the foundation of the dam.
The width of the canyon at the base of the dam was 70
feet, all of which was taken up by the water of the river. For 150 feet above
the dam and for 350 feet below the dam, the river channel had a grade of 2 feet
per hundred, producing a velocity in the water of about 20 feet per second. The
erosion produced by such a current would not permit winging the river from side
to side, neither would blasting in the river bottom permit fluming the river, so
a wing dam of rock-filled cribs, 30 feet high, was made 100 feet upstream from
the main dam.
This wing dam diverted the river from its original
channel through an unlined tunnel around the east end of the dam. This tunnel is
356 feet long with a cross section of 16 feet by 18 feet and a grade of 2 feet
per hundred.
The dam to be built was of the arch-gravity type, 130
feet in height above the bed of the river, 90 feet thick at the base and 13 feet
thick at the top. The length of the crest would be 400 feet, curved on the arc
of a circle of 356 feet radius, curvature upstream. The center 200 feet of the
crest was to be an overflow section capable of discharging the highest
floodwaters. At the upper toe there was a cutoff wall 10 feet thick extending
below the foundation of the dam at least 10 feet, and at the lower toe there was
provided an apron which would discharge the overflow water in a horizontal
direction.
Owing to the position of the canyon walls at the dam
site, it was found impossible to place the structure perpendicular to the river
bed, the west abutment being further down- stream than the east abutment.
However, by making the dam curved with a 356-foot radius the ends were found to
strike the canyon walls nearly perpendicularly.
The
powerhouse was to be of reinforced concrete with floor dimensions 70 feet by 170
feet and would eventually contain four complete hydroelectric units with
exciters, switch- boards and transformers.
Each
unit was made up of a 12,500 KVA, 10,000 KW at 80 per cent power factor, 200
RPM, 2300 volts, generator weighing 325,470 pounds, connected with an 18,600 HP
cylindrical type hydraulic turbine of 84 per cent efficiency, 20 per cent speed
rise, 200 RPM, weighing 400,000 pounds and governed by an a.c. oil pressure
type, fly-ball governor of 75,000 feet pounds capacity.
In October 1912 excavation was started in the river
bottom and 24 Diamond drill holes were drilled from shafts on the two sides of
the river. These holes intersected at elevation minus 60, which was 130 feet
below water surface of the river at the dam site, indicating a foundation for
the dam would result in a dam 260 feet high.
A
wedge-shaped section of gravel and sand filled the river bottom about 81 feet
wide at water surface, averaging about 40 feet wide, and about 200 feet up- and
down-stream. This wedge was removed by sinking 6' x 12"-2 compartment
shafts, using old-time mining techniques and filling these shafts with concrete
until a wall was completed across the upstream face of the dam and also the
downstream toe of the dam. The material between those walls was removed as an
open pit and filled with concrete.
When river bottom was reached, a hard continuous andesite
was found with no faults or seams. It was smooth as though it had been polished
by falling water and on its surface was a layer up to 4 inches deep of fine
white marine shells. These looked like snail shells and ranged from pinhead size
to that of a wheat kernel.
The
river bottom was 10 feet narrower and 10 feet higher in elevation at the
downstream toe of the dam creating a perfect wedge as an additional safety
factor against shear and sliding.
On
the west abutment during the excavation in the river bottom for the upstream
cut-off wall, a pothole was found. This pothole was about 10 feet in diameter,
with a rim on the river side about 15 feet high and bottom elevation about plus
10 feet. It contained coarse sand and round pebbles, which were the remains of
basalt boulders, which had churned out the hole by constant movement by water.
In the bottom of the hole was found the skull and bones of an extinct bison, so
classified by the
The horns were part of the bone structure connected to
the skull and were covered with a layer of smooth substance (ivory) which slaked
and fell off immediately upon drying. (July 11, 1914.)
The
bottom of this pothole also contained a layer of fine marine shells similar to
those found on the bedrock at the bottom of the dam.
Practically
all the work done during the two years from June 1913 to June 1915 was in the
foundation of the dam. While the work progressed very satisfactorily, it was
slow on account of the reduced force of men. The average number of men working
during the two-year period was 27.
A pressure grouting system was developed on the job, which aided greatly in excavation of loose gravel in the river bottoms.
Yreka (Siskiyou News).
"The
project is a big undertaking and it is difficult to get enough concrete and
other, material needed in continuous quantities and is also difficult to
transport the needed articles to the scene of the work.
“Representatives
of the company deny the report there is any defect in the formation which would
make the dam unsafe. They say as soon as material arrives work on the dam will
be rushed." On
However, a contract provided that the S.E.P&. L. Co.
should continue to completion the work in progress. Bonds and preferred and
common stocks were sold by Copco to provide construction money.
On February 2, 1916 the Yreka Journal said:
"In order to secure funds for needed construction work, the completion of
the great power project at Copco, on the Klamath River, ...the stockholders of
the California-Oregon Power Company have assessed themselves $3.30 a share on
the outstanding stock, while the bondholders have cooperated by waiving interest
on bonds outstanding for five years. This method of financing construction work
was deemed preferable to a new bond issue, which would increase interest charges
on the company.
"
A committee of bondholders has the power to make a settlement with the company,
either for cash or stock covering interest in default. In addition to bonds
deposited to secure borrowed money, there are $3,200,000.00 first and refunding
bonds outstanding.
"The
company is paying interest on $1,200,000.00 underlying bonds and on its floating
debt and is earning enough to pay upon the first and refunding bonds, but
necessary construction is underway for which the money is needed. "These
financial arrangements have been accompanied by a reorganization of the company,
with some of the strongest financiers in
This marked the passing of control from Churchill to the McKee
interests. The Churchills,
In May 1910, river gauging was begun at the Ward's bridge and records of river discharges were kept daily. A study of the records over a period of five years indicated a change from a uniform flowing stream to one with lower water in summer and higher water in early spring.
Answer to the change was readily found in the development of the reclamation and irrigation project being constructed by the U. S. Reclamation Service in the Upper Klamath basin.
While
the change in river flows were not too serious at the time, they were destined
to get worse as the Reclamation Service projects progressed.
The Company had already invested
large sums of money on Klamath River Dam No. 1 and No.2, so it was faced with
either bringing suit involving interstate water rights or making some
arrangement wherein it could get some measure of control of water in the
During the fall of 1915, a
delegation of financial men and engineers from
The
appraisal showed about $1,000,000 had been spent and about $2,000,000 would be
needed to complete the project. However, by leaving about 13 feet off the top of
the dam and installing only one unit in the powerhouse the remaining cost might
be reduced to about $1,000,000.
Approximate
costs charged to the work by January I, 1916
Real
Estate (Reservoir, etc.)
$
114,000.00
Powerhouse
Equipment -2 units complete.
217,000.00
Interest
on Construction.
101,000.00
Bond
Discount.
35,000.00
Railroad.
66,000.00
$ 533,000.00
All
other charges over a period of about
51/2 years
-actual construction expenditure.
475,000.00
$1,008,000.00
-The
river had been diverted through the tunnel.
-The excavation
completed on the abutment cuts of the dam.
-All
explorations for foundations were finished.
-The
layout for Copco No.2 had been completed.
-The excavation
for powerhouse No.1 was completed to water level.
-The
construction plant, crushers, sand machines, mixers and conveying equipment for
concrete were ready.
-The two units
for the powerhouse with transformers and associated equipment were delivered.
-The upstream
cut-off wall for the dam foundation was finished to 30 feet above water level,
and work was progressing on the downstream cut-off wall.
-The
railroad had been made operational, and a one-mile spur had been built to camp
and on down the canyon to the powerhouse.
All the difficult foundation work was done. What was needed now was cement, forms, reinforcing steel, labor, supplies and money.
The original plans were changed in the following respects. The original
four-unit plant was reduced to two units. And instead of developing a peaking
plant of 40,000 KW, it was reduced to a system load factor plant of 20,000 KW.
Provision, however, was made on the down- stream end of the powerhouse for
expansion and installation of two additional units if warranted in the future.
The forebay was eliminated. The original 17-foot diameter penstock was replaced
by two 10-foot diameter penstocks connected directly from the dam to the twin
turbine wheels of Unit No. I. A bulkhead at the west end of the dam provided
space for the second unit.
In the spring of 1918, after the first generating unit
was put in operation, the officers and some of the directors of the company
gathered at the Copco guest house for a party. They toasted and complimented
each other, looked down upon the water flowing quietly over the dam, proclaiming
the dam each one felt he had built. And they were entitled to do so, as they had
provided much of the money. Words of thanks and praise were expressed to the
dozens, yes hundreds of men, who for nearly seven years had given their best,
their know-how and their pride of workmanship in the construction of that
beautiful structure.
Then
came a variety of jobs to be done. These were to:
(1) Move the
steel road bridge two miles upstream from the
(2) Ship hoists,
tools, supplies and all usable items to the Benecia shipyards.
(3) Sell off the
scrap.
(4)
Build the new fish traps at Klamathon and survey and build a fish hatchery, with
attendant cottages, for the California Fish Commission at Fall Creek.
(5)
Build the first interconnecting line (66 KV) from Castella to Kennett to
transmit surplus Copco No. 1 power to the Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
(6)
Build new Fall Creek penstock head box during fall of 1918.
Water for the first unit of the Copco No. 1 plant was turned into the
penstock on
Copco
had worked out a plan with the Pacific Gas and Electric Company, and the
Northern California Power Company to build an interconnection of the three
systems. "The arrangement was accomplished by a tri-party contract"
which enabled Copco to dispose of a large amount of surplus power when Copco No.
1 plant was put in operation and thereby substantially add to its revenues. The
scheme was entirely feasible and justified at the time by the saving in fuel oil
by substituting hydroelectric energy for steam generated energy and the need for
more power in the Bay area.
The
estimated cost of $450,000.00 to be equally borne by the contracting companies
was made available to build the line. The Copco system was heavily loaded and
maintenance and reconstruction was badly needed. So Copco No. 1-A second unit
was rushed and put into operation by the end of 1922 and the dam was increased
to its ultimate height.
The contract with the Pacific Gas and Electric Co. provided for delivery of 12,600 KW from Copco No. 1 and No. 1-A out of 20,000 KW of generating capacity at 70% load factor.
Location survey work, prospect work, foundation
investigations and general layout of the Copco No.2 project were made during the
time Copco No. 1 was being built.
As originally
planned in 1911 and 1912, this plant consisted of a dam, spillway, open canal
and tunnel to a four 10,000 KW unit power plant.
Before
construction was started, the development was changed to a two-unit plant to
handle the streamflows through the Copco No. 1 powerhouse. The dam, waterways
and power- house were changed to generate 30,000 KW under a static head of 157
feet, net operating head of 140 feet, and a water capacity of 2600 to 3000
second feet.
Before
construction was started, economic studies were made of the development, the
result of which provided for the following:
(1) A diversion
dam about 50 feet high located about 1300 feet downstream from Copco No. 1 dam,
together with a concrete intake structure, spi11way gates and accessories.
(2) A 16-foot
diameter horseshoe-shape concrete-lined tunnel (No. 1) connecting the intake at
the dam with a woodstave pipe.
(3) A 16-foot
diameter creosoted Douglas fir woodstave pipeline to Tunnel No.2.
(4) A 16-foot
diameter horseshoe-shape concrete-lined tunnel with an underground pipe line to
Tunnel No.2.
(5) Two
131/2-foot diameter steel penstocks about 400 feet long.
(6)
Reinforced concrete and structural steel powerhouse containing two 15,000 KW
units with accessory equipment.
(7)
Power to be generated at 6600 volts and stepped up to 130,000 volts to make
deliveries to Pacific Gas and Electric Company over Line 14.
Construction of the Copco No.2 dam was involved with the
difficult problem of dewatering the foundation because of the loose material
encountered in the river bottom at the dam site. It was necessary to build a
diversion flume over the dam site from a cofferdam upstream. While this
cofferdam and flume were well constructed, there was leakage of about 30 second
feet, which had to be accumulated in an auxiliary flume while excavation of the
dam was in progress. It was also necessary to construct a cofferdam downstream
from the dam to prevent backwater entering the excavation.
Excavation
from the dam involved about 20,000 cubic yards from the bottom and sides of the
river. In order not to disturb the foundation any more than necessary, all
blasting was confined to breaking up the boulders encountered. Two gunite
cut-off walls were constructed along the axis of the dam from the two ends of
the main structure. And the backfill along the gunite wall was carefully placed
by hand and by sluicing material from the hillsides to fill the voids.
The
materials underlying the foundation of the dam were grouted through drill holes
properly spaced to a depth up to 15 feet. The grouting operation also extended
over the intake structure and also the cut-off walls wherever the, formation
indicated that there might be seepage.
Tunnel No. 1 is approximately 2400 feet long with one adit about midway between the upper end and "the lower end, making four headings, with one ventilating shaft. Timbering was required, and because of swelling ground the size of the timbers had to be increased and extra sets provided. Difficulty was also encountered in drilling operations because of poor steel breaking. Delays in construction also resulted during the winter months from a strike.
Because
of the various formations encountered, it was impossible to use uniform methods
in lining the tunnel with concrete. Where sound rock was encountered, no
reinforcing steel was used. In some timbered sections reinforcing steel was
placed 12 inches on centers. And in critical sections, reinforcing was placed 4
inches on centers.
The
invert was poured first and the arch placed later with a concrete gun. Blaw-Knox
moveable steel forms were used for the arch. However, some hand filling was
necessary to completely fill the crown of the arch.
The
connecting link between Tunnel No.1 and Tunnel No.2 consisted of 1313 lineal
feet of 16-foot inside diameter creosoted fir woodstave pipe under contract with
Continental Pipe Manufacturing Company.
The
concrete cradles and steel stiffener rings were designed and supplied by the
Company. When completed, the pipe was filled with water and placed under full
head to prevent drying out and to enable caulking butt joints and adjusting
bands where necessary.
Tunnel No.2, about 5000 feet long, connected the 16-foot
diameter woodstave pipe to the two 131/2-foot steel penstocks. It was driven
from two headings. The excavated section was sufficient to obtain a 16-foot
inside diameter horseshoe section with 9-inch concrete lining in rock and
21-inch concrete lining where timbered.
The
surge chamber, constructed in rock above the tunnel, was unusual as to size and
de- sign. It had a vertical vent from the top of the surge chamber and an
overflow spillway, which carried any surplus waters back to the river channel
above the powerhouse. The tapering portion of the chamber was concreted; the
lower portion was gunited.
The
penstocks were connected directly to the outlet of Tunnel No.2, and each
penstock was connected directly to the turbines in the powerhouse. Anchor blocks
included both penstocks, and the sections between anchor blocks were backfilled
to the springline with loose rock.
The powerhouse was reinforced concrete substructure with structural
steel building. Hydracones were installed in the draft tube as energy absorbers.
Eleven-and-a-half-foot butter- fly valves were installed between the end of the
penstocks and the entrances to the scrollcases with 12-inch by-passes. The
superstructure was designed to support two 40-ton
The
outdoor substation, switching structures and associated equipment connected this
plant to the Company's 66 KV system and to the 130 KV line from Copco to connect
with the system of Pacific Gas and Electric Company for delivery of an
additional 20,000 KW at 70% load factor.
Copco No.2 plant was put into commercial operation in July 1925. Capacity 30,000 KW.
| Fair
Use Statement
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, sustainable development, democracy, public disclosure, and social justice issues, etc. We have included the full text of the article rather than a simple link because we have found that links frequently go "bad" or change over time. We believe this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without fee or payment of any kind to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner |