Oregon
environmentalists ready for ‘new day' in Legislature
By BRAD CAIN
The Associated Press
January 15, 2007
SALEM — When environmental activist Sybil Ackerman
sat down for a one-on-one meeting with newly installed House Speaker
Jeff Merkley, she couldn't help but marvel at the setting.
"I've lobbied for environmental causes for 10
years, but I'd never seen the inside of the House speaker's office
before," Ackerman says of her recent get-together with Merkley.
Environmentalists contend they've been given the
cold shoulder by Republicans who ran one or both chambers of the
Legislature over the years. Now they are anticipating a new day at the
State Capitol with what they call the first
"pro-environment" Democratic majority in the House since
1990.
They plan to use their newfound access — and maybe
clout — to push for an expansion of Oregon's once-pioneering bottle
deposit law and a new program to safely recycle the hundreds of
thousands of old computers and other used electronic equipment piling
up in people's homes.
Also on the agenda: a renewed push for a cleanup of
the Willamette River; an extension of Oregon's pesticide use reporting
program; and maybe even a ban on field burning by grass seed farmers.
It's hard to predict whether any of those things
will win passage. There's little doubt, though, that the political
equation has changed since former House Speaker Karen Minnis and other
Republicans were ousted from power in last November's election.
"The difference now is, people are really
taking our opinions seriously. We feel like our voice matters,"
says Ackerman, chief lobbyist for the Oregon League of Conservation
Voters.
Paulette Pyle, a spokeswoman for a pesticide
industry group known as Oregonians for Food and Shelter, knows her
side is on the outs with the new Democratic majority in the House
after years of enjoying especially close ties with Minnis.
"We don't have a lot of stuff that we're going
to be putting into the hopper. We will probably be playing defense
this year," Pyle says.
Senate Republican Leader Ted Ferrioli says even
though Democrats regained control of the House in November and
retained control of the Senate, they shouldn't take that as a mandate
from the voters to approve everything on the environmentalists'
"aggressive" agenda.
"I hope and pray we do not see environmental
warfare against Oregon's small farms and businesses," the John
Day lawmaker said. "Oregonians want balance. People should try to
be rational."
With the Legislature now controlled by his party,
Democratic Gov. Ted Kulongoski has included in his 2007-09 budget
money for improved water and air quality monitoring and enforcement.
His proposal places special emphasis on testing for toxins that enter
the Willamette River and other waterways.
Kulongoski made several references to the
environment in his inaugural speech on the opening day of the
Legislature's 2007 session. He said Oregonians have a new opportunity
to regain "our reputation as a people who honor our natural
environment."
Kulongoski spokeswoman Anna Richter Taylor says that
in addition to his budget priorities, the governor is supporting other
environmental initiatives, such as updating Oregon's bottle deposit
law to encourage recycling of a greater number of beverage containers.
"This is a very promising legislative
session," Richter Taylor said. "For the first time in a long
time, there is an opportunity to advance some very important
environmental policies."
As the new speaker of the House, Merkley believes
there is a lot of public support for "making our state as clean
as we possibly can" and that House Democrats will work hard for
such things as an updated bottle bill, a program to recycle old
computers and a cleanup of the Willamette.
Under the previous Republican-controlled House,
Merkley said, the governor's proposal to give the state Department of
Environmental Quality more resources to monitor the Willamette River
"would have been dead on arrival."
"The discussion then would have been about
cutting the DEQ's staff in half," the Portland Democrat said.
Some of the pending bills are sure to spark vigorous
debate, such as the one to ban field burning, which some Willamette
Valley grass seed farmers use as a method to clear stubble and kill
weeds, and which sends huge pillars of smoke into the air each summer.
The state receives hundreds of complaints about the
practice each year from people, especially those suffering from
asthma, despite reductions in the annual acreage burned from 320,000
acres in the 1970s to about 50,000 acres in recent years.
The grass seed industry says field burning accounts
for only a tiny fraction of the state's overall air pollution problem,
and that a field burning ban would be an undue hardship on many grass
seed growers, who together comprise a $500 million a year industry for
Oregon.
Rep. Paul Holvey, a Eugene Democrat who is
sponsoring the field burning ban, says he doesn't know if there's
enough support to pass the bill but he expects it to at least get a
full public hearing. Such a bill likely wouldn't have seen the light
of day in previous sessions run by the Republicans, Holvey said.
"That is a change," he said. "We will
be able to at least have a discussion in a public venue about this
issue."