Tuesday, August 29, 2006 The bill would have provided $5 million in grants to
salmon fishermen and $20 million in zero-interest loans to fishermen and
coastal businesses such as ice houses, bait shops and others that depend on
the beleaguered industry. The money would be on top of emergency funds they
already are entitled to under a recent federal disaster declaration. Most West Coast salmon fishermen are expected to land just
12 percent of their normal harvest this year after the federal government
imposed severe restrictions. In a statement, Schwarzenegger blasted the Legislature for
not taking action on the relief package. "It is a great disappointment and mistake for the
Legislature to block the passage of this important legislation,"
Schwarzenegger said. "We cannot turn our back on those in need of this
vital relief package or force these Californians to wait for federal
help." A spokesman for Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez, D-Los
Angeles, said the governor's office had waited too long to work out an
agreement with opponents of the bill. As a result, lawmakers would need to
grant the bill a rare rule waiver and other exceptions to bring it to a
vote. Lawmakers have not done so in at least two years,
spokesman Steve Maviglio said. He put the blame squarely on the administration. He also
called the bill a poor attempt by the administration to make up for
Schwarzenegger's inability to more quickly secure federal relief for salmon
fishermen. "The administration typically didn't do their
homework and waited until the 11th hour to address this," Maviglio
said. "This speaks more to their ineptness in securing federal funds
than fixing the problem. If the governor had spent a little more time in the
Capitol or in Washington, D.C., lobbying, we'd have already solved this
problem." Ryan Broddrick, director of the California Department of
Fish and Game, said he was surprised Tuesday to learn Nunez and others would
not grant the rule waiver. He said he believed the administration had
reached a deal with legislative leaders to bring the measure to a vote. On Aug. 10, after months of prodding by Schwarzenegger,
Oregon's governor and members of Congress, U.S. Commerce Secretary Carlos
Gutierrez declared commercial salmon fishing a failure off Oregon and
California. Salmon returns have diminished due to drought, poor ocean
conditions, water management issues, disease and the elimination of access
to historical spawning habitat. The federal government in April sharply reduced the
commercial salmon fishing seasons off Oregon and California to protect
struggling returns of wild fall chinook salmon in the Klamath River. There is no commercial fishing on 400 miles of coast
straddling the mouth of the Klamath and strictly limited fishing on another
300 miles. The move earlier this month by the commerce secretary
enabled states to seek federal aid. Some officials said that assistance
could top $80 million, but Broddrick said Congress has yet to appropriate
funding for the fishermen. He said they may not receive any aid until next
year. "Our plan is broader and reaches into the community
deeper" Broddrick said. "We don't think we're crying wolf on this
issue. The impact on the fishermen has been getting progressively worse over
the past three to four years and is very significant and is happening
now." The bill's author, state Sen. Wesley Chesbro, D-Arcata,
remains hopeful the legislation will be heard before the current legislative
session ends Thursday, spokeswoman Annette Porino said. Absent the state relief package, Schwarzenegger said his
administration would look for ways to expand a small business loan program
to help the fishermen.
Prospects dim for relief bill to help California salmon
fishermen
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who
have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml