GRANTS PASS, Ore. (AP) — Salmon advocates Monday notified the federal
agency in charge of protecting salmon that they intend to go to court to
challenge a decision not to put Oregon Coastal coho salmon back on the
threatened species list after a court ruling took it off. The 60-day notice of intent to sue, required by law before bringing a
lawsuit against the government, argues that the decision by NOAA Fisheries
violates the Endangered Species Act, goes against the best available science
and relies on a new theory put forth by the state of Oregon that coho can
rebound even from very low populations. "Coho are still in trouble, their habitat is still in trouble, and now
is not the time to declare mission accomplished and walk away," said Jan
Hasselman, an attorney for Earthjustice in Seattle, who represents the
coalition of salmon conservation and fishing groups. "The federal protection is a backstop that ensures that we think
through all our actions, whether it is timber sales, new roads or pesticides.
Without that backstop we may be flying blind." NOAA Fisheries policy adviser Todd Ungerecht said from Seattle that the
agency had no immediate comment on the notice, because they had only just
received it and lawyers had not fully reviewed it. NOAA Fisheries announced last January that, due to the state's efforts to
limit fishing, reform hatchery production and improve freshwater habitat, it
was shelving a proposal to put Oregon coastal coho back on the threatened
species list. With no federal protection, there are fewer regulations on logging,
agriculture, land development and restoration work from Astoria to Port Orford. The fish was listed in 1998, primarily due to overfishing, loss of habitat
to logging, agriculture and urban development and misguided hatchery
practices. But a federal judge ruled in 2001 that NOAA Fisheries had erred in
lumping hatchery and wild fish in the same population group, but only granting
ESA protections to wild fish. In 2003, Oregon reached an agreement with NOAA Fisheries to revive an
earlier Oregon Plan for Salmon, which emphasized voluntary efforts to restore
the fish, and the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife came out with a
report finding that Oregon coastal coho remained viable as a species, even
when ocean conditions were poor. Groups listed on the notice to sue include the Oregon Natural Resources
Council, Pacific Rivers Council, Trout Unlimited, Pacific Coast Federation of
Fishermen's Associations, the Native Fish Society, Umpqua Watersheds, the
Coast Range Association, and the Institute for Fisheries Resources.Salmon advocates to sue over Oregon Coastal coho
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who
have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Source: http://www.oregonlive.com/newsflash/regional/index.ssf?