|
|
Albany Democrat-Herald Editorial
July 6, 2007
Democrats in Congress last week
charged that Vice President Dick Cheney helped kill salmon on the
Klamath River in 2002. How so? He apparently had a hand in devising a
plan that tried to assure that farmers in the Klamath Basin would have
enough water to keep their operations going.
In September that year, tens of thousands of adult salmon died in the
river because of gill-rot disease, a condition that may have been
aggravated by low water conditions and an unusually large return of
fish that year.
The main charge is that Cheney manipulated, suppressed or otherwise acted against science for political motives.
Instead of condemning
public officials on such grounds, we ought to be grateful to them for
taking into consideration the needs and interests of American
citizens.
If there’s a water shortage and farmers need an allocation to
survive, then surely it’s a good thing for federal water authorities
to try to help them. And if Cheney had anything to do with this, as
reported from Washington, he deserves no blame.
Science is supposed to inform what people do, not determine that they
do. When there’s an election, we don’t vote for science; we vote
for people who can make decisions. We need the political process to
mediate among the various branches of science, and between science and
the public interest when they seem to conflict.
For example, various branches of the natural sciences might advise it
is best for farmers to be thrown off their land so that the earth can
recover and fish be left alone. Social science and medicine, on the
other hand, would predict such such a move would cause human
suffering, physical and otherwise. In such situations we expect our
elected officials to consider the alternatives and make a choice. If
the reports from Washington are true, it looks as though Cheney did.