NEYSA A. FLIGOR (SBN 215876)

STEIN & LUBIN LLP

600 Montgomery Street , 14th Floor

San Francisco , CA 94111

Telephone:   (415) 981-0550

Facsimile:     (415) 981-4343

 

Attorneys for Proposed Intervenors

THE NEW 49’ERS, INC., a California corporation, and RAYMOND W. KOONS, an individual

 

 

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY
OF ALAMEDA
UNLIMITED CIVIL JURISDICTION

KARUK TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA and LEAF HILLMAN,

                        Plaintiffs,

v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME and RYAN BRODDRICK, Director, California Department of Fish and Game,

                        Defendants.

 

Case No. RG05 211597

DECLARATION OF MARCIA ARMSTRONG

 

Date:         

Time:          .

Judge:        Honorable Bonnie Sabraw

Place:         Department 512

                 

 

Filing Date: January 10, 2005

Trial Date:  

 

            Marcia Armstrong, being duly sworn, deposes and says:

            1.         I am the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of Siskiyou County , California .  The Board consists of five members.  I am authorized by Resolution No. _____, adopted by the Board of Supervisors on January 3, 2005 (copy attached hereto as Exhibit __), to provide testimony in this action as set forth herein, and the position herein represents the position of Siskiyou County .

            2.         Siskiyou County has jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by this litigation that are held in trust for the people of California , specifically mineral resources.  Siskiyou County has exercised such jurisdiction through, among other means, its planning ordinances, including Chapter 5 of Title 10 of its Planning and Zoning Ordinance, regulating surface mining and reclamation.

            3.         Siskiyou County is entitled to notice under the California Environmental Quality Act when lead agencies of the State of California make various determinations pursuant to that Act, and an opportunity to participate in related proceedings under the Act.

            4.         Siskiyou County has historically had problems with Sacramento agencies providing the requisite notice and thus specifically amended Planning and Zoning ordinance to add Chapter 12.  In adopting the ordinance, the Board of Supervisors found that:

 

“(a) Actions of state and federal agencies to plan, adopt rules or regulations, acquire land or interest in land, in fee or through easements, promulgation of programs, land adjustments, and other activities of these agencies can have significant effects on the customs, culture, economy, resources, and environment of the County of Siskiyou and its citizens.

 

“(b) In order to protect the customs, culture, economy, resources, and environment of the County of Siskiyou, it is critical that federal and state agencies recognize and address the effects of any actions proposed within the County which may affect matters, including, but not limited to, economic growth, public health, safety and welfare, land use, the environment, conservation of natural resources, such as timber, water, fish, wildlife, mineral resources, agriculture, grazing, and recreational opportunities.

 

“(c) The coordination and consideration of the County's interest is required by law, such as in those requirements set forth in the National Environmental Protection Act, the National Forest Management Act, the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act, the Federal Land Policy and Management Act, the Federal Administrative Procedures Act, the State of California Public Resources Code, the California Environmental Quality Act, and numerous other federal and state statutes and administrative procedures.

 

“(d) These various state and federal laws provide for participation by Siskiyou County and the public through opportunities for comment on proposed projects and actions.

 

“(e) There is general County concern that, in the past, the legally required process of notification, referral, and coordination of activities described above may not have been consistently followed by state and federal agencies, which has led to concerns by the County and its residents that uncoordinated actions may have been adopted contrary to the requirements of law and potentially detrimental to the customs, culture, economy, resources, and environment of the County of Siskiyou.

 

“(f) There is a clear need to establish an effective and consistent joint procedure for advance notification, referral, coordination, and participation to be followed by all state and federal agencies when undertaking activities or actions affecting the public health, safety, land use, customs, culture, economy, conservation of natural resources and environment of the County of Siskiyou, which procedure provides for a timely advance notice of opportunities for participation which are essential to the integrity of the decisionmaking processes of these state and federal agencies.

 

“(g) In order for this coordination and consultation to be meaningful, the said notice and opportunity for input shall be given at the earliest possible stage of the federal and/or state governments' contemplation or consideration of a particular course of action with regard to land use plans, actions, or decisions affecting land use in Siskiyou County and such notice shall be given with sufficient specificity and prior to any psychological momentum having been developed with regard to the particular plan, action, or decision.”

 

            5.         Accordingly, the Board of Supervisors adopted procedures to provide full rights of participation:   

“(a) All federal and state agencies shall inform the County of Siskiyou , or its designee, of all pending, contemplated or proposed actions affecting local communities, citizens, or affecting County policy, and shall, if requested by the County, coordinate the planning and implementation of those actions with the County or its designee(s). Such notification shall include a detailed description of the proposed plan, procedure, rule, guideline, or amendment sufficient to fully inform lay persons of its intent and effects, including the effects on the resources, environment, customs, culture, and economic stability of the County of Siskiyou .

 

“(b) The Siskiyou County Board of Supervisors shall be consulted in accordance with the laws and regulations of the State of California and the United States regarding any pending, contemplated, or proposed actions affecting local communities and citizens.

 

“(c) All federal and state agencies shall, to the fullest extent permissible by law, comply with all applicable procedures, policies, and practices issued by the County of Siskiyou .

 

“(d) When required by law or when requested by the County of Siskiyou, all federal and state agencies proposing actions that may impact citizens of the County of Siskiyou shall prepare and submit in writing, and in a timely manner as soon as is practicable, report(s) on the purposes, objectives and estimated impacts of such actions, including environmental, health, social, customs, cultural and economic impacts, to the County of Siskiyou. Those reports shall be provided to the County of Siskiyou for review and coordination with sufficient time to prepare a meaningful response for consideration by the federal or state agency.


“(e) Before federal and state agencies can alter land use(s), environmental review of the proposed action shall be conducted by the lead agency and mitigation measures adopted in accordance with policies, practices, and procedures applicable to the proposed action and in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws. Impact studies shall, as needed, address the effects on community and economic resources, the environment, local customs and public health, safety, and welfare, culture, grazing rights, flood prone areas and access and any other relevant impacts.

 

“(f) For the purposes of this ordinance, each federal and state agency shall, unless specifically authorized otherwise, give the required notice(s) to the County of Siskiyou and the Board of Supervisors, via certified mail, as follows:

 

“Siskiyou County Board of Supervisors

P. O. Box 338

Yreka , CA 96097

 

“ Siskiyou County Planning Director

P.O. Box 1085

Yreka , CA 96097

 

“ Siskiyou County Assessor

County Courthouse , Rm. 108

Yreka , CA 96097

 

“(g) Not less than five (5) complete copies of the written documents supporting the proposed action shall be provided to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors at the above referenced address in such a timely manner so that there can be meaningful review and input sufficiently in advance of the action.

 

“(h) Notification of the availability of related documents shall be available for the minimum time set forth by the federal and state statute for such review or, if none is established by law, for a period of not less than forty-five (45) days prior to the proposed date of action, adoption or approval. This time is necessary to ensure adequate local opportunity for consideration and response.”

            6.         Siskiyou County recently became aware of the above-captioned case, and has reviewed a copy of the complaint, which alleges CEQA violations, and a Joint Stipulation pursuant to which the California Department of Fish and Game has agreed to issue new regulations governing suction dredge mining, including significant closures of areas within Siskiyou County. 

            7.         At no time prior to execution of that Joint Stipulation did anyone from the Department or the Attorney General’s office advise the County that any determination had been reached concerning the need for additional environmental review under CEQA to assess impacts of suction dredge mining, nor was the County advised of the changes in suction dredge mining regulations reflected in the Joint Stipulation.

            7.         The County believes that the Department was required to notify it and afford it and other interested parties an opportunity to participate in decisionmaking under CEQA, and any decisionmaking concerning revisions to regulations concerning suction dredge mining.

            8.         Suction dredge mining is a significant resource activity within the County and contributes to County economic development.  It appears that the regulations the Department proposes will significantly and adversely affect that activity, as well as the valuable property rights of those individuals holding mining claims within the County.

            9.         The County is also concerned about the precedent established by these regulations, which appear to restrict an important activity in the absence of any evidence of any significant and adverse effect upon fish and wildlife, though in the absence of a public process it is not possible for the County to know what evidence the Department may possess.

            10.       The County urges this Court not to enter the requested injunction, and instead require the Department to follow normal procedures in promulgating any revisions to the suction dredge mining regulations.

            I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

 

Dated:  January ____, 2006                             

                                                                               

Marcia Armstrong