






|
Become a friend of
the Klamath Bucket
Brigade
Send
Donations Here
All donations are tax
deductible
|
|
This Website is Dedicated to
Alvin Alexander Cheyne
January
10, 1921 - June 17, 2005
|
|
|

As George Bush pushes Congress to bail
out Wall Street corporations, he refuses to immediately
release $70 million out of the $170 million appropriated
by Congress for disaster relief to salmon fishermen and
businesses impacted by this year's salmon closures.
Bush Withholds Salmon Disaster Money As
He Pushes For Corporate Bailouts!
by Dan Bacher
While George W. Bush wants taxpayers to give Treasury
Secretary Henry Paulson a $700 billion blank check to
bail out Wall Street for its reckless speculation and
greed, the administration announced last week that it
would release only $100 million of the $170 million
appropriated to salmon fishermen and businesses impacted
by this year's salmon fishing closure off the California
and Oregon coasts and in Central Valley rivers.
Representatives Peter DeFazio (OR-04) and Mike Thompson
(CA-01), along with 10 other members of Congress, wrote
to President Bush on September 19 urging him to
distribute the full $170 million in disaster aid to
fishermen and businesses suffering from the closure of
the salmon fishing season on the West Coast caused by
the collapse of the Sacramento River fall run chinook
salmon population.
"Playing games with the livelihood of fishers across the
Pacific Northwest is yet another sign that the Bush
Administration has no commitment to protect our valuable
river systems, and no interest in helping the fishing
communities and economies that rely on them," the letter
stated. "It is also completely unacceptable. We insist
that you comply with congressional intent and
immediately release the full $170 million in federal
disaster aid for Pacific Northwest fishers."
The other Representatives who signed the letter were
Baird, Blumenauer, Capps, Eshoo, Farr, Hooley, Matsui,
Woolsey, Wu and George Miller.
“The Bush Administration has once again put politics
ahead of people," said North Coast Congressman Mike
Thompson (D-CA). "Because of the Administration’s
disastrous policies, Pacific coast fishing families have
been devastated. Congress appropriated $170 million in
federal disaster relief, but this latest proposal by the
Bush Administration to withhold a large portion of these
funds shows no regard for hardworking fishing families
nor their livelihood."
“I am absolutely astounded that the Administration is
not distributing the full $170 million Congress
allocated in the Farm Bill to deal with the salmon
disaster," DeFazio said. "Instead, they are trying to
steal $70 million from salmon fishermen and give it to
an incompetent defense contractor. The fishing community
of Oregon is already suffering because of the flawed
Bush policies in the Sacramento River basin. They should
not have to suffer again because the President has hired
people in Florida who can’t count. We’ve been there
before."
In a news release, U.S. Commerce Secretary Carlos M.
Gutierrez offered no reason why the other $70 million
owed to the fishermen and businesses wasn't being
released immediately.
“The salmon fishery has been a mainstay of the West
Coast’s ocean fishing revenues for many years,” said
Gutierrez. “This year’s closure left thousands of
fishermen and dependent businesses struggling to make
ends meet. This disaster aid package of $100 million
will help them get back on their feet.”
Brian Gorman, spokesman for NOAA Fisheries, said the
remaining $70 million of Congressionally appropriated
disaster-relief money "is expected to become available
later in the year as the $100 million is spent."
"The administration requested to transfer $70 million
for the Census, but I have no idea if there is support
for this in Congress," Gorman added. "If there is no
vote to do otherwise, the funds will remain as
originally designated and the disaster relief aid will
become available after October 1. I expect all of the
money to be distributed."
He noted that the agency will provide the money in the
form of a grant to the Pacific States Marine Fisheries
Commission. The commission will distribute the money,
based on the agreements reached with the states, to
fishermen and related businesses affected by this year’s
closure of the ocean salmon fishing season off
California, Oregon, and Washington.
The governors of all three West Coast states requested a
federal disaster declaration as a result of the
closures. The declaration, issued by Gutierrez in May,
paved the way for Congress to appropriate the $170
million disaster-relief package in July.
The states of Washington, Oregon, and California
estimated damages to the fishing industry to total $290
million. The full disaster aid is needed immediately in
order that fishermen can make boat payments, insurance
payments, mortgage payments, and keep food on the table.
In June, the Office of Management and Budget that puts
together the President’s annual budget sent Congress a
revised budget request for more funding to carry out the
2010 Census. The White House is requesting $546 million
more for the Census, and has proposed using $70 million
of the $170 million in salmon disaster money allocated
in the Farm Bill, to pay for the cost over-runs,
according to DeFazio and Thompson.
The Administration entered into a contract with the
Harris Corporation, a Florida defense contractor, to
conduct the Census, but the contractor has run into
serious cost over-runs amounting to hundreds of millions
of dollars. Congressmen DeFazio and Thompson and 13
other members of Congress sent President Bush a letter
at that time that they say was "largely ignored" by the
Administration.
The refusal to dispurse the $70 million in salmon aid
relief now is particularly outrageous because the Bush
and Scharzenegger administrations are largely
responsible for the unprecedented fishery collapse. The
population of the Sacramento fall run chinook salmon
population has declined from over 800,000 in 2002 to
less than 60,000 fish this year.
The Bush and Schwarzenegger administrations claim that
"ocean conditions" are responsible for the collapse, but
all of the available evidence demonstrates that it is
water policies that favor agribusiness and corporate
water developers over fish, the environment and local
communities that caused the dramatic decline. The
collapse undoubtedly occurred because of record water
exports from the California Delta by the state and
federal projects to drainage-impaired land in the San
Joaquin Valley during the years this year's returning
salmon were supposed to go to sea. For example, 2005 was
a record export year with 6.4 million acre feet of water
diverted from the estuary.
It is believed that many salmon never made out of
Bay-Delta estuary, but were instead chopped up in the
Delta pumps, disoriented and stranded in dead end
sloughs because of reverse flows caused by pumping, and
deprived of forage. At the same time, the state of
California failed to put its hatchery salmon into salt
water acclimation pens, as they had done previously,
during 2005 and 2006. This resulted in increasing loss
of salmon to predators when the stunned salmon were
released into San Pablo Bay.
I believe that you can't fully understand the Central
Valley chinook salmon collapse without understanding the
dramatic decline of four California Delta pelagic
species - delta smelt, longfin smelt, juvenile striped
bass and threadfin shad. A team of federal and state
scientists has pinpointed water exports as the number
one cause of the "Pelagic Organism Decline," followed by
toxic chemicals and invasive species.
As Peter Moyle, prominent U.C. Davis fishery scientists,
recently stated, "Overall, blaming 'ocean conditions'
for salmon declines is a lot like blaming Hurricane
Katrina for flooding New Orleans, while ignoring the
many human errors that made the disaster inevitable,
such as poor construction of levees or destruction of
protective salt marshes. The listings of the winter and
spring runs of Central Valley Chinook as endangered
species were warnings of likely declines on an even
larger scale. Continuing on our present course will
result in the permanent loss of a valuable and iconic
fishery unless we start taking corrective action soon."
Meawhile, the Bush administration, while trying to steal
money allocated to the victims of a fishery collapse
engineered by the Bush and Schwarzenegger
administrations, wants to soak the taxpayers for another
$700 billion for corporate criminals who should be in
jail, not receving another handout. That's on top of
$1.1 trillion for other recent bailouts, including A.I.G.,
Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Bear Stearns. Just when you
think the Bush regime has sunk to a new low, it will
always find a way to reach a lower level of criminality
in its policy of "socialism for the rich."
Note: The House Committee on Oversight and Government
Reform held a hearing on the Harris Corporation and the
problems with the Census on June 11, 2008.
http://oversight.house.gov/story.asp?ID=2001.
The text of the letter sent to President Bush is below:
September 18, 2008
The Honorable Jim Nussle, Director
Office of Management and Budget
Washington, DC. 20503
Dear Director Nussle:
We write with increasing concern regarding full
disbursement of the $170 million appropriated by
Congress to compensate fishers for the unprecedented
closure of the West Coast salmon fishery.
Earlier this week, NOAA Fisheries (NOAA) indicated that
it would be dispersing $100 million of the $170 million
appropriated by Congress to provide aid to affected
fishers. NOAA further indicated that the remaining $70
million may be disbursed if further need was
demonstrated, and “if Congress did not act to rescind
the funds.” We have been informed that NOAA is not
dispersing the full amount now because OMB has not yet
released the funds. We find this unconscionable.
First, as we expressed to you in June, it is
unacceptable that the Administration has proposed – and
now seems to be trying to implement – a plan to take
disaster aid from the fishing communities of California,
Oregon and Washington to pay for cost overruns
associated with this Administration’s questionable
contract with the Harris Corporation to complete the
2010 census. Indeed, the reason why Congress had to step
up to provide this emergency aid to fishers in our
states is because of this Administration’s unlawful and
shortsighted policies regarding the Pacific Northwest’s
rivers.
Second, we have received no satisfactory explanation for
why OMB can legally withhold funds that Congress has
appropriated for a specific purpose such as this. The
states of Oregon, Washington, and California have
followed the process set out in the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, which provides for emergency assistance. Now that
NOAA has accepted the application from Pacific Fishery
Management Council, and has approved the $170 million
grant to the states, OMB is legally obligated to release
the funds so that affected fishers may receive the aid
they desperately need. The law provides for no further
“assessment of need,” and we are aware of no precedent
for OMB’s alleged “phased” disbursement of these funds.
To us, the fact that OMB is withholding $70 million,
when it proposed in June to reprogram this exact same
amount to pay for the Administration’s mistakes with its
census contract, smacks of political gamesmanship.
Playing games with the livelihood of fishers across the
Pacific Northwest is yet another sign that the Bush
Administration has no commitment to protect our valuable
river systems, and no interest in helping the fishing
communities and economies that rely on them. It is also
completely unacceptable. We insist that you comply with
congressional intent and immediately release the full
$170 million in federal disaster aid for Pacific
Northwest fishers.
Sincerely,
Baird
Blumenauer
Capps
DeFazio
Eshoo
Farr
Hooley
Matsui
Thompson, Mike
Woolsey
Wu
Miller, George
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section
107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or
payment to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this
information for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more
information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
|