|
Become a friend of the Klamath Bucket Brigade All donations are tax deductible |
|
This Website is Dedicated to Alvin Alexander Cheyne January 10, 1921 - June 17, 2005 |
GovTrack.us is an independent tool to help the public research and track the activities in the U.S. Congress, promoting government transparency and civic education through novel uses of technology.
Conservation Groups Challenge Bush's Gutting of ESA
by Dan BacherDecember 11, 2008
George W. Bush, the worst-ever President for fish and the environment in the nation's history, will leave office after 8 years the same way that he came in - with yet another attack on the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and other environmental laws.
The lame duck Bush administration finalized a rule change today that greatly weakens the ESA, the only law that stands between many imperiled fish, wildlife and plant populations and extinction.
Environmental advocates and commercial fishermen are vowing to reverse this last ditch move and restore protections for America's endangered and threatened birds, fish and wildlife, according to a news release from Earthjustice. Conservation and fishing groups, represented by the national environmental organization Earthjustice, announced they will challenge the new rule in federal district court. "The Bush rule change violates federal law by not adequately considering the true impact on wildlife populations it will inflict," the release stated.
"This new rule makes every ESA action a purely political decision rather than based on the best available science as the law requires," said Glen Spain of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations (PCFFA). "On the west coast, this would mean the extinction of most of the nation's existing salmon runs and the loss of a billion-dollar fishing industry."
"These rules would be a lasting reminder of all of the disdain for science and political trumping of expertise that have characterized the Bush Administration's efforts to dismantle fundamental environmental laws," said Sierra Club executive director Carl Pope.
Commercial and recreational salmon fishing in ocean waters off California and Washington was closed for the first time in history this year, due to the collapse of Central Valley fall chinook populations. Although the Bush and Schwarzenegger administrations blame the collapse on "ocean conditions," conservation groups, Indian Tribes and independent scientists point to massive water exports out of the California Delta and declining water quality as the key factors behind the dramatic decline in the once robust fishery.
The Bush administration leaves behind 8 years of environmental destruction throughout the country as his legacy. In California, his dark legacy is highlighted by the Klamath River fish kills of 2002, the Prospect Island fish kill of November 2007, the collapse of Central Valley chinook salmon populations, and the precipitous decline of Delta smelt, longfin smelt, threadfin shad, juvenile striped bass and other fish species. Coastal and inland communities throughout the state have been economically devastated by Bush's abysmal mismanagement of water, the environment and the economy.
Regardless of whoever is appointed by Obama as Secretary of Interior, he/she will have a monumental task ahead. The Bush administration has pursued a "scorched earth" policy towards fish, wildlife and the environment that will take many years to reverse. Environmental advocates must put intense pressure upon President-Elect Barrack Obama to make sure that he makes good appointments to key environmental posts and ends the federal government's war on the environment and science.
This is today's press release from
Earthjustice:
Conservation Groups Act to Restore Wildlife Protections
Bush administration removes federal wildlife experts from important decision making
December 11, 2008
Washington, DC -- Today the Bush administration finalized a rule change that greatly weakens the Endangered Species Act. Environmental advocates and commercial fishermen are vowing to reverse this move and restore protections for America's endangered and threatened birds, fish and wildlife.
The new, weaker ESA rule cuts federal wildlife scientists out of the review process for federal projects. Now federal agencies involved with projects such as new highways, bridges, dams and airports can self-regulate to determine the threats posed to imperiled wildlife, a move that wildlife organizations believe poses grave threats to wildlife. These agencies not only lack the expertise to determine whether federal projects pose a threat to endangered wildlife, they have a built-in conflict of interest.
In a 2005 court ruling, Earthjustice, a public interest environmental law firm, successfully challenged a similar proposal to weaken the Endangered Species Act. That proposal authorized the EPA to exclude fish biologists from the US Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service from decisions regarding the harm pesticides pose to federally protected salmon runs. A federal district court ruled this was a clear violation of the Endangered Species Act.
Conservation and fishing groups, represented by Earthjustice, announced they will challenge the new rule in federal district court. The Bush rule change violates federal law by not adequately considering the true impact on wildlife populations it will inflict.
The new rule also ignored federal requirements that assure the public's right to review and comment on proposed rule changes. The Bush administration fast-tracked this proposal with as little public input as possible, refusing to accept comments by email or hold public hearings. Administration officials spent only four days reviewing the estimated 235,000 public comments regarding the rule change. Of that total, they admitted 200,000 opposed the rule change.
Earthjustice is representing the Sierra Club, Conservation Northwest, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations (PCFFA), and the Institute for Fisheries Resources. The Natural Resources Defense Council is joining Earthjustice in handling the lawsuit.
"Whether we're talking about bald eagles or grizzly bears, gray wolves or northern spotted owls, they all need the benefit of wildlife experts when decisions are being made that might wipe out the habitat or food a wildlife species needs," said Earthjustice attorney Janette Brimmer.
"This administration has rejected anything with a whiff of science -- so before sulking out the back door, they are going after rules that force its use to prevent harm to our last wild animals and places," said Andrew Wetzler, director of the Endangered Species Program for the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). "We remain convinced that these changes are illegal, so I guess we will see them in court."
Glen Spain of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations (PCFFA), said, "This new rule makes every ESA action a purely political decision rather than based on the best available science as the law requires. On the west coast, this would mean the extinction of most of the nation's existing salmon runs and the loss of a billion-dollar fishing industry."
"These rules would be a lasting reminder of all of the disdain for science and political trumping of expertise that have characterized the Bush Administration's efforts to dismantle fundamental environmental laws," said Sierra Club executive director Carl Pope. "When it comes to protecting wildlife, we should listen to the scientists who spend their lives studying these animals. If they say global warming is the biggest threat to polar bears, then we should do what it takes to eliminate that threat."
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
A listing of endangered and threatened species can be found at: http://www.fws.gov/endangered/wildlife.html/A>
Contact:
Raviya Ismail, Earthjustice, (202) 667-4500, ext. 237, cell (859) 940-9993
Conservation Groups Act to Restore Wildlife Protections
Bush administration removes federal wildlife experts from important decision making
December 11, 2008
Washington, DC -- Today the Bush administration finalized a rule change that greatly weakens the Endangered Species Act. Environmental advocates and commercial fishermen are vowing to reverse this move and restore protections for America's endangered and threatened birds, fish and wildlife.
The new, weaker ESA rule cuts federal wildlife scientists out of the review process for federal projects. Now federal agencies involved with projects such as new highways, bridges, dams and airports can self-regulate to determine the threats posed to imperiled wildlife, a move that wildlife organizations believe poses grave threats to wildlife. These agencies not only lack the expertise to determine whether federal projects pose a threat to endangered wildlife, they have a built-in conflict of interest.
In a 2005 court ruling, Earthjustice, a public interest environmental law firm, successfully challenged a similar proposal to weaken the Endangered Species Act. That proposal authorized the EPA to exclude fish biologists from the US Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service from decisions regarding the harm pesticides pose to federally protected salmon runs. A federal district court ruled this was a clear violation of the Endangered Species Act.
Conservation and fishing groups, represented by Earthjustice, announced they will challenge the new rule in federal district court. The Bush rule change violates federal law by not adequately considering the true impact on wildlife populations it will inflict.
The new rule also ignored federal requirements that assure the public's right to review and comment on proposed rule changes. The Bush administration fast-tracked this proposal with as little public input as possible, refusing to accept comments by email or hold public hearings. Administration officials spent only four days reviewing the estimated 235,000 public comments regarding the rule change. Of that total, they admitted 200,000 opposed the rule change.
Earthjustice is representing the Sierra Club, Conservation Northwest, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations (PCFFA), and the Institute for Fisheries Resources. The Natural Resources Defense Council is joining Earthjustice in handling the lawsuit.
"Whether we're talking about bald eagles or grizzly bears, gray wolves or northern spotted owls, they all need the benefit of wildlife experts when decisions are being made that might wipe out the habitat or food a wildlife species needs," said Earthjustice attorney Janette Brimmer.
"This administration has rejected anything with a whiff of science -- so before sulking out the back door, they are going after rules that force its use to prevent harm to our last wild animals and places," said Andrew Wetzler, director of the Endangered Species Program for the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). "We remain convinced that these changes are illegal, so I guess we will see them in court."
Glen Spain of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations (PCFFA), said, "This new rule makes every ESA action a purely political decision rather than based on the best available science as the law requires. On the west coast, this would mean the extinction of most of the nation's existing salmon runs and the loss of a billion-dollar fishing industry."
"These rules would be a lasting reminder of all of the disdain for science and political trumping of expertise that have characterized the Bush Administration's efforts to dismantle fundamental environmental laws," said Sierra Club executive director Carl Pope. "When it comes to protecting wildlife, we should listen to the scientists who spend their lives studying these animals. If they say global warming is the biggest threat to polar bears, then we should do what it takes to eliminate that threat."
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
A listing of endangered and threatened species can be found at: http://www.fws.gov/endangered/wildlife.html/A>
Contact:
Raviya Ismail, Earthjustice, (202) 667-4500, ext. 237, cell (859) 940-9993
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml