|







|
Become a friend of
the Klamath Bucket
Brigade
Send
Donations Here
All donations are tax
deductible
|
|
This Website is Dedicated to
Alvin Alexander Cheyne
January
10, 1921 - June 17, 2005
|
|
|

DC Tollbooths
& The Founding Fathers
Now that the
dust has (temporarily) settled on the latest DC government
scheme to tax others for their own benefit, a short review is in order.
The DC government proposal to establish tollbooths to "tax
commuters" is the
best argument to date as to why the DC government is already too
powerful
and should be put back in the bottle like some impish genie that only
wreaks
harm. This challenge to Constitutional government has been
described as
"unfair" to commuters and "too much" when added to
the already record
breaking taxes paid for takeout food in the District. Nowhere,
that I can
find, has anyone harkened back 230 years to the exact way that our
Founding
Fathers foresaw the danger of either a State government or other
government
exercising power in and over the Nations'
Capitol
City
.
On 22 October 1787 John DeWitt noted "That the citizens of
Philadelphia are
running mad after it (sic, the location of Congress and the site of the
national Capitol), can be no argument for us to do the like: - Their
situation is almost contrasted with ours (sic, he was a Dutch patriot
from
Massachusetts); they suppose themselves a central State; they expect the
perpetual residence of Congress, which of itself alone will assure their
aggrandizement."
In the Federalist Papers, No. 32, Alexander Hamilton was concerned about
a
Federal or
Capitol
City
"where the exercise of
a concurrent jurisdiction
might be productive of occasional interferences in the policy of any
branch
of administration".
In the Federalist papers, No. 48, James Madison strongly supported that
the
Congress " exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever,
over such
district (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cessation of
particular
States and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of government of
the
United States". He goes on the state the need for, "The
indispensable
necessity of complete authority at the seat of government carries its
own
evidence with it. It is a power exercised by every legislature of
the
Union
, I might say of the world,
by virtue of its general supremacy.
Without it not only the public authority might be insulted and its
proceedings interrupted with impunity, but a dependence of the members
of
the general government on the State (sic, today's District government)
comprehending the seat of government for protection in the exercise of
their
duty might bring on the national councils an imputation of awe or
influence
equally dishonorable to the government and dissatisfactory to the other
members of the Confederacy (sic, today's Unites States)".
What were they concerned about in today's world? What would be the
role of
DC government (dare I note an avowedly racial minority government at the
moment) tollbooths in the event of a national convergence of
demonstrators
on
Washington
to say, eliminate all
racial and sex-based preferences? What
would be the role of DC government tollbooths in the event of farmers
converging on
Washington
to demand higher food prices that DC residents
would fiercely oppose or to oppose Roe v Wade that most DC residents
support? What would be the role of DC tollbooths when any American
seeks to
enter the Capitol and redress grievances with the government? What
would be
the role of DC tollbooths when Congressional staffs or certain lobbyists
or
experts are hurrying to address some national issue that is of no
concern to
the DC government or that it opposes?
To even entertain such possibilities reminds all of us how smart the
fellows
that founded this great nation were and how parochial and cowardly are
those
that today cater to and encourage such dangerous actions. The
issue is so
much more than fairness to commuters or funding DC schools and roads.
The
DC government is too big for its britches (and the national good) and
the
Congress should either administer the
Capitol
City
or let us replace them
with those that can, for the benefit of all of us.
Jim Beers
14 May 2007
-
If you found this
worthwhile, please share it with others. Thanks.
- This article and other recent articles by Jim Beers can be found at
http://jimbeers.blogster.com (Jim Beers Common Sense)
- Jim Beers is available for consulting or to speak. Contact:
jimbeers7@verizon.net
- Jim Beers is a retired US Fish & Wildlife Service Wildlife
Biologist,
Special Agent, Refuge Manager, Wetlands Biologist, and Congressional
Fellow.
He was stationed in
North Dakota
,
Minnesota
,
Nebraska
,
New York City
, and
Washington
DC
. He also served as a
US Navy Line Officer in the western
Pacific and on
Adak
,
Alaska
in the
Aleutian Islands
. He has worked for
the
Utah Fish & Game, Minneapolis Police Department, and as a Security
Supervisor in
Washington
,
DC
. He testified three
times before Congress;
twice regarding the theft by the US Fish & Wildlife Service of $45
to 60
Million from State fish and wildlife funds and once in opposition to
expanding Federal Invasive Species authority. He resides in
Centreville
,
Virginia
with his wife of many
decades.
|