|







|
Become a friend of
the Klamath Bucket
Brigade
Send
Donations Here
All donations are tax
deductible
|
|
This Website is Dedicated to
Alvin Alexander Cheyne
January
10, 1921 - June 17, 2005
|
|
|

No
Representation Without Taxation
Conservation easements on
private property are accumulating all across this
great nation. There are no summaries of the total acreages under
such
easements in spite of the fact that most such easements have either
tax-exemptions of tax-subsidies making them possible. Large
easement
purchasers like The Nature Conservancy (TNC) have come to be worth
billions
and employ large staffs as they not only broker tax dollars and
easements
purchases but also buy and later sell to government land parcels that
are
either key to other agendas like "Wildlands Corridors" or road
closures or
planned developments or simply parcels that the government cannot buy
at the
moment but can buy at a future date.
All of these "Conservancies" and "Alliances" and
"Foundations" have come to
be intimate "partners" with politicians and bureaucracies as
they each
"scratch each other's back". The current Secretary of
the Treasury is a
former TNC Executive even though scandals about their propriety and
bookkeeping keep surfacing and diving like a whale fleeing a whaler.
They
meet both openly and informally with Federal bureaucrats and Congressmen
to
"plan" and "partner". They sit on
"Boards" and "Commissions" and they work
hand-in-glove with the environmental extremists and animal rights
radicals
that are stifling this nation.
The Federal government buys easements: ask any farmer in the
Dakotas
or
Minnesota
. TNC takes easements
everywhere: as in the past 3 years all over
the South as fear-mongering by bureaucrats and academicians about an
extinct
woodpecker that may "need" the government to condemn large
southern forests
if owners don't sell an easement on their forests. "Land
Alliances" of
every stripe barter and hoodwink rural residents to sell easements with
all
the veracity of carnival barkers and
Florida
real estate brokers working
in
New York City
50 years ago. Urban County "Planners" and
"Green" state (no,
not Vermont but states like Massachusetts and New Jersey and California;
you
know the ones the rest of us are supposed to "be like" when we
"grow up")
bureaucrats all demand and get an "easement" for any
permission for anything
they "grant" land-owning "peasants" like you and me.
Easements are
everywhere and they are proliferating like mushrooms on a manure pile
after
a rain.
Key easements can strangle rural communities and rural economies just as
surely as government land purchase or government land closures or
government
land non-management. Reducing grazing and logging fits in with
driving land
purchase prices down and putting more land up for sale. Economies
suffer
when new land uses are foreclosed and opportunities are foregone.
Easements, when coupled with steady government land purchase over time,
just
as surely replace a free Republic with a Socialist state-run society as
any
invading army or any communist revolution ever has.
"So what can anyone do about it?" "It is just as
inevitable as the loss of
guns and hunting and trapping, etc." Don't believe it.
The "new" Congress has lists a mile (soon I should say a
kilometer but what
the heck, mile) long of increased environmental tyrannies and animal
rights
oppressions to win the upcoming Presidential race. Prominent among
these
are all manner of government land purchases and tons of financial
support
for "easements" by every government "partner"
"from hell to breakfast"
(whatever that last is supposed to mean). Over in the Ways and
means
Committee they are planning every sort of tax increase and tax-break
erasure
imaginable as they too gear up for the upcoming Presidential
sweepstakes.
So I suggest we take a leaf from them to try and save rural
America
from
where it is being forced to go.
First, we have all witnessed the recent "discovery" of the
heretofore
unmentioned "power" of City, State, County, and even local
(Townships, Water
boards, etc.) officials (that can tax and that have bureaucrats under
them)
to declare their fiefdoms a "SANCTUARY". Evidently all
they have to do is
instruct all the police, bureaucrats, or anyone else they
"control" to "not
cooperate with any Federal official or organization or group regarding
immigration laws". If they have this "power"
regarding Federal Immigration
Laws, why not "other" Federal laws? This action
should be taken regarding
any future easement sale or purchase or the solicitation of such
transactions in the future in "this City or County or Water
District or
State or wherever". Land records, fees, approvals,
requirements, etc.
should be ramped up for such transactions. Don't tell me about
"willing
sellers": there is no such thing when government coercion and
government
subsidies hide agendas intended to make the rest of us serfs and private
property an extinct matter not even allowed to be discussed in schools.
Second, every governmental entity that taxes or has taxing authority
should
explore TAXING ALL CURRENTLY HELD LAND EASEMENT OWNERS (the easement
owner, not the landowner) ON AN ANNUAL BASIS. No value, you say? I
beg to differ.
They were purchased for a price. Many landowners would buy them
back for a
price. They are "worth" a lot to Congress and to the
organizations holding
them (the easements not our beloved "Representatives").
They are worth
millions in annual lost revenue to foregone development. They are
worth a
great deal in foregone employment and tax generation for said entities.
Now
states vary in how they tax but many I have lived in tax your cars and
tax
your gun collection and tax your boats and tax your estate, etc., etc.:
why
not tax on the easement "holders "value? A committed
lawyer and some harmed
landowners from across the nation (farmer, rancher, retiree, etc.)
should be
able to come up with a model phraseology for use by serious politicians
and
others who "control" bureaucracies and have the authority to
tax to insert
at appropriate spots. If other state or local laws need to be
modified, why
not modify them? Those using these easements and government
coercion to
turn rural
America
into a playground for the
rich have no such hesitations.
Third, we should determine where our City, County, State, and other
Local
elected officials stand on this issue. We should defeat those that
will not
support us and work to defeat those opposed to withdrawing official
support
from easement proliferation or from TAXING EASEMENT OWNERS ON AN ANNUAL
BASIS.
What about Federal government easements? State and local officials
should
explore declaring the GOVERNMENT EASEMENT VALUE EQUIVALENT TO
GOVERNMENT-OWNED PROPERTY AND APPLY FOR REVENUE SHARING AND
PAYMENT-IN-LIEU-OF-TAXES (PILT) accordingly. If the Federal
government
refuses to recognize this (surprise, surprise) pressure should be
applied to
Federal politicians to make it happen. This is real political work
needed
by the nation as opposed to all the power jostling going on for personal
aggrandizement in
Washington
; we need real politicians and not the current
crew.
If the Federal government (politicians and bureaucrats) and all their
ne'er-do-well
"partners" want to run the rural countryside, they should be
forced to pay
the piper like the rest of us for the privilege to do so. If they
"can't
afford" to pay "all that tax" then foreclose their
interests and tell them
to go and rent somewhere else, preferably in some city where they have
much
more in common with the community. The Federal government promised
years
ago to support local communities when they bought chunks of land.
Those
promises were all lies given today's crop of dangerous bureaucrats and
Federal politicians. When they aren't bribing our state
bureaucrats, they
are sending into rural communities these "surrogate"
bureaucrats promising
to "save" that which, like the old Federal tax promises, they
know we like
to hear about but will forget eventually.
Fourth, this takes cooperation and cooperation requires tolerance.
Farm
groups in
North Dakota
and oppressed acreage
landowners in
Washington
state
need to talk and work together with loggers and ranchers. Hunters,
trappers
and fishermen need to take their heads out of the sand and realize that
their revered activities are the result of a free Republic with
guaranteed
property rights and NOT a product of Soviet-style or Zimbabwean
government
land controls. Groups such as private property advocates from
Missouri
need
to talk with like groups from
New Mexico
and
Florida
. Federal sponsors of
things like Invasive Species authority or Native Ecosystems mandates
should
be driven from office by constant negative publicity and truth.
Groups
supporting sensible energy development and local planning authority
likewise
need to find and work with counterparts in other parts of the country.
Rural
America
is under siege and
easements are one of the most silent and
dangerous weapons being employed.
Only when the entire pastiche of rural communities from gamefowl
breeders
and muskrat trappers to rural business communities comes together is
there
any likelihood of stemming this easement tsunami. Coming together
and
cooperating requires tolerance and until we tolerate each other we will
remain the vulnerable little villages we have become being picked off
one at
a time.
Jim Beers
3 Sep. 2007
-
If you found this
worthwhile, please share it with others. Thanks.
- This article and other recent articles by Jim Beers can be found at
http://jimbeers.blogster.com (Jim Beers Common Sense)
- Jim Beers is available for consulting or to speak. Contact:
jimbeers7@verizon.net
- Jim Beers is a retired US Fish & Wildlife Service Wildlife
Biologist,
Special Agent, Refuge Manager, Wetlands Biologist, and Congressional
Fellow.
He was stationed in
North Dakota
,
Minnesota
,
Nebraska
,
New York City
, and
Washington
DC
. He also served as a
US Navy Line Officer in the western
Pacific and on
Adak
,
Alaska
in the
Aleutian Islands
. He has worked for
the
Utah Fish & Game, Minneapolis Police Department, and as a Security
Supervisor in
Washington
,
DC
. He testified three
times before Congress;
twice regarding the theft by the US Fish & Wildlife Service of $45
to 60
Million from State fish and wildlife funds and once in opposition to
expanding Federal Invasive Species authority. He resides in
Centreville
,
Virginia
with his wife of many
decades.
|