Conservation easement preserve family's way of life
By LORNA THACKERAY
Of The Gazette Staff
February 26, 2006
Glasgow-area rancher Steve Page wasn't thinking about tax
incentives when he negotiated a conservation easement on 24,000 acres in
Valley County.
"The fundamental concern of our conservation easement is preservation of
native sagebrush grasslands," he said.
But the easement that Page sold to the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife
and Parks may help keep his sons and grandchildren on land that his wife's
family has owned since 1912.
"We consider it a long-term family operation," he said. "My
sons are fourth-generation."
The easement hasn't interfered with the ranch operation. A
grazing management plan was adopted to benefit wildlife habitat, but it was
nothing he objected to.
"The most significant aspect is that this will be maintained as a
livestock operation," he said.
Beyond protection of a family way of life, the easement had the advantage of
reducing the value of the ranch. That, in turn, will reduce inheritance tax
liability.
As the price of land continues to rise, the reduction in value can become
important to multigeneration operations. It can mean the difference between
selling the farm to pay the taxes and keeping it in the family for generations
to come.
Landowners who donate easements can also receive hefty federal income-tax
deductions, said his daughter, Mary Page, who runs the Montana Land Reliance's
Eastern Montana office in Billings. State taxes won't change, however. Under
Montana law, conservation easements do not affect values for property tax
purposes.
But federal law considers the decreased value of the land as a charitable
contribution for tax purposes. Under the law, donors can deduct an amount up
to 30 percent of adjusted gross income and spread it over six years.
Legislation that would make land easement donations more attractive by
allowing donors to extend use of the deduction to up to 16 years has been
passed in the U.S. Senate. It also increases the amount that farmers and
ranchers can offset up to 100 percent of adjusted gross income. The House
version of the tax legislation, however, does not contain these provisions. A
conference committee of House and Senate lawmakers will try to forge a
compromise starting this week.
If the tax breaks are increased, Mary Page said, "a lot of people have
said they will place conservation easements on their property."
How much the deduction is worth depends on how much the easement shaves off
the value of the land.
To be eligible for the deduction, a qualified independent appraiser must
establish a pre-easement fair market value for the property. Then the
appraiser does a second evaluation based on what the land is worth with the
attached easement. The difference between the two appraisals constitutes the
charitable contribution.
Most of the time, the easement knocks off between 20 and 30 percent of the
market value, said David Dietrich, a Billings attorney specializing in
agricultural real estate law. But market value can be more seriously affected
on properties with high development potential. An easement on a property with
subdivision possibilities could mean an 80 percent reduction in market value,
he said.
"We don't see a lot of 70 or 80 percent takedowns, but they're out
there," he said.
Until recently, most of the interest in easements as an estate planning tool
came from Western Montana, where land prices have soared on the basis of what
people are willing to pay for recreational and amenity values. Inheritance
taxes are based on those inflated values, not on the value of the ranch as an
agricultural property. Cash poor, land rich families face selling all or part
of the land to pay the taxes.
"In the 1980s and 1990s, what we were seeing was really high land prices
in the Flathead and Bitterroot," Dietrich said. "It's starting to
move into the Gallatin. It's moving east into the Yellowstone. We're seeing
that it's no longer agricultural values in a lot of places. It's recreation
value. In the Musselshell, all you have to do is add elk."
Jim Taylor, a managing director at Hall and Hall in Billings, one of the
West's largest farm-ranch realty and management companies, said there is
always a recreational component in land sales, but in Eastern Montana, buyers
are still more interested in operating values.
The hottest properties are those in reasonable proximity to towns and
airports, he said. Rivers or live waters, diverse terrain and areas where elk
and waterfowl are plentiful draw a lot of interest, and they tend to be
scattered around, Taylor said.
"The remote ranches are probably not as desirable," he noted.
"But there are so many factors that come into values."
A lot of property in Eastern Montana has been on the market during the last 10
to 12 years, said Mark Norem, a Big Timber real estate agent and land manager
with clients all over the West. Much of the land has been purchased by
neighbors expanding their operations. To make a living in agriculture, ranches
and farms have to keep getting bigger, he said.
But competing buyers from outside the community may undermine some expansion
plans.
"Land is getting pretty expensive for neighbors to buy," Taylor
said.