|







|
Become a friend of
the Klamath Bucket
Brigade
Send
Donations Here
All donations are tax
deductible
|
|
This Website is Dedicated to
Alvin Alexander Cheyne
January
10, 1921 - June 17, 2005
|
|
|

Conservation
of water is not enough
Consumers
benefit from farmers’ efficient water use and conservation
Bob
Krauter
Capital Press
January 18, 2008
California
farmers and consumers are
in for a rocky road in 2008 as water becomes scarcer than ever. It will
likely mean more water conservation in cities and on farms. It will also
mean fallowed fields, water transfers and greater farmer reliance on
groundwater. The dire water year is rooted in lingering drought and the
water supply cutbacks imposed by a federal judge last August to help
listed fish species.
As urban residents face greater conservation measures this year, eyes
will be on rural water users. The water watch will likely place farmers
and ranchers under greater scrutiny. Farmers who receive state and
federal surface water through aqueducts and canals have been frequent
targets over the years by organizations like the Environmental Working
Group.
Frequently, the EWG blasts growers that receive water from the federal
Central Valley Project, a network of reservoirs and canals that they
describe as the "largest taxpayer-funded federal irrigation system
in the country."
Many people have bought on to the myth that these farmers have caught a
big break with subsidized irrigation water. The current debate in
Sacramento
about fixing the state's
water system hinges on the need for additional storage. Some lawmakers
think that rather than build new dams, Californians should conserve more
to satisfy future water needs. They think farmers already have plenty of
water and that they, too, should conserve.
The dim notion that some have of agriculture's water use is ill
conceived. Environmental activists and some legislators ignore the
ultimate beneficiary of farmers' efficient water use and on-farm
conservation - consumers.
Water that flows to farms and ranches helps grow more than $31 billion
in high-quality, affordable food, fiber, flowers and forest products.
But the state's vast array of crops and farm commodities is not possible
without water. According to the California Farm Water Coalition, it
takes more than 894 gallons of water to produce a daily serving of food
for the average
California
consumer.
As water has become more limited and costly over the years, farmers have
employed greater levels of conservation and irrigation technology.
Today, they are producing more food with less water than ever. There's
greater use of micro-sprinklers, drip irrigation and drip tape. It is
difficult to find almond orchards and winegrape vineyards that don't use
drip irrigation. Many farmers recycle and reuse irrigation water - from
the
Central Valley
to the state's southern desert regions. Even some growers of
cotton, a crop that groups like the Environmental Working Group have
assailed as a water hog, use drip tape to conserve water.
This year will likely require sacrifices by urban and rural residents to
deal with looming water shortages. Farmers will do their part as they
have always done.
But no one should believe in the folly that conservation alone, this
year or any year, will solve our state's serious water fix. No doubt,
conservation is key. Farmers will apply every measure of conservation
this season to stretch limited water supplies, but if consumers want a
diverse supply of high-quality, affordable home-grown food, we'll need
to invest in new water storage and other neglected improvements to the
state's water system. If we don't, the pain of water-short years like
2008 will likely become permanent.
Bob Krauter is the
California
editor based in
Sacramento
. E-mail: bkrauter@capitalpress.com.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those
who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go
to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Source:
http://www.capitalpress.info/main.asp?SectionID=84&SubSection
ID=777&ArticleID=38469 |