|







|
Become a friend of
the Klamath Bucket
Brigade
Send
Donations Here
All donations are tax
deductible
|
|
This Website is Dedicated to
Alvin Alexander Cheyne
January
10, 1921 - June 17, 2005
|
|
|

Farm
income stays ahead of input costs
States
producing corn, soybeans, wheat benefit from rising prices
Scott
A. Yates
Capital Press
February 22, 2008
Net
farm income in 2008 is expected to be 51 percent above its 10-year
average, plenty for farmers to make a profit even with rising input
costs, which, by the way, are expected to be 34 percent above their
10-year average.
The Economic Research Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture said
given the diversity of
U.S.
agriculture, changes in
farm income are not necessarily distributed evenly throughout the
nation. As the ERS report of Feb. 12 put it: States that are leading
producers of corn, soybeans and wheat stand to benefit the most with
prices for their product rising faster than most other commodities and
their expenses rising roughly in line with other crops.
If the $92.3 billion in net farm income
U.S.
agriculture earned this
year is the sun, the $71 billion in expenses farmers paid are the
clouds. History says today's high commodity prices will eventually fall
back toward Earth; no one has a handle on input costs.
By the end of 2008, the ERS forecasts that fuel prices will have risen
159 percent since 2002. And that's not the scary part. The ERS said
fertilizer costs are driving the current increase in expenses and may be
a greater concern for farmers than fuel.
Following a $2.7 billion, 20 percent increase in 2007, fertilizer
expenses are forecast to rise $3 billion in 2008. The prices for potash
and phosphate alone rose nearly 57 percent during 2007.
The low dollar is helping out farmers' bottom line by exerting a greater
demand for
U.S.
exports. This demand helps
boost farm prices enough to offset increases for imported fuel, nitrogen
and potash.
Although the Northwest has largely escaped the seed technology effect,
seed prices have been rising throughout the rest of the nation as a
result of biotech traits bred into corn and soybeans. Between 2006 and
2008, seed costs are estimated to rise 14.3 percent.
Pesticide expenses are on their way up, too, with a projected increase
of 11 percent in 2008. Prices paid for pesticides are projected to be 9
percent of that increase.
The expense leader, however, is feed, projected to rise 18.2 percent in
2008 to a record high $45 billion. The primary cause of the rise in feed
expenses is the projected increase in corn and soymeal prices. Corn
accounts for 91 percent of feed grains used for feed, and soymeal is the
principal oil crop product used as feed.
At the end of 2007, corn prices were at record levels, and the ERS
forecasts them to continue climbing throughout 2008. Soymeal prices are
also at record levels and are projected to remain high.
Another cloud on the horizon is ongoing drought in several regions,
including the mountain West. Farmers in regions with significantly lower
yields benefit less from high commodity prices since they have less to
sell. The report also warned that farmers in drought regions typically
see a greater rise in production costs for things like irrigation, feed
and hay.
"When gross farm income is lower and production costs are higher,
net income for individual producers can quickly turn negative for
operations mired in drought conditions," the report said.
Despite the clouds, the silver lining in 2008 shows average farm
household income is almost 20 percent above its five-year, 2002-06
average.
Projected off-farm income of $75,805 in 2008 accounts for nearly 85
percent of the average farm operator's household income.
Staff writer Scott Yates is based in
Spokane
. E-mail: syates@capitalpress.com.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those
who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go
to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Source:
http://www.capitalpress.info/main.asp?Search=1&ArticleID=39512&
SectionID=67&SubSectionID=790&S=1
|