






|
Become a friend of
the Klamath Bucket
Brigade
Send
Donations Here
All donations are tax
deductible
|
|
This Website is Dedicated to
Alvin Alexander Cheyne
January
10, 1921 - June 17, 2005
|

GovTrack.us is an independent tool to help the public
research and track the activities in the U.S. Congress, promoting
government transparency and civic education through novel uses of
technology.
|
|

Fiscal woes affecting water
quality projects
IPM, erosion control and
more halted due to lack of
funding
Cecilia Parsons
Capital Press
December 31, 2008
Ag
water-quality improvement
projects have been halted
due to the state budget
crisis.
Project managers were
notified Friday, Dec. 19,
that all grant money funded
by voter approved
Propositions 50 has been
frozen by the state until
the budget issue is
resolved.
"This will gut central coast
agricultural water quality
improvement efforts," said
Kay Mercer, coordinator for
the Agricultural Watershed
Coalition. The coalition
works with individual
growers or organizations,
such as the Central Coast
Vineyard Team, to help them
find ways to avoid
contaminating surface or
groundwater.
"We're still assessing, but
we know there will be an
impact on water quality,"
Mercer said.
The projects have been
successful so far because
they provide incentives for
growers to participate, and
their improvements can be
measured. Sediment and
pesticide residue runoff
into streams that run into
the Pacific have been
decreased since growers
began efforts to improve
management practices.
Mercer said central coast
counties are involved in
multiple projects and had
grants for a $1.9 million in
improvement efforts. Without
the proposition funding,
only a fraction of the work
would be done, she said.
The projects include
integrated pest management
strategies to help with
run-off, erosion control,
sediment basins and
improving irrigation
systems.
The projects were also
providing information in
Spanish on nitrates and use
of filter strips and
hedgerows to reduce sediment
run-off from agriculture
fields.
Mercer's projects were among
several dozen water
improvements projects
statewide funded by
propositions that used bond
state bonds. She had the
second largest grant in the
state.
Tacy Currey, executive
director of the California
Resource Conservation
District, said the state
couldn't sell bonds to fund
the projects because of
their low credit rating.
The state controller's
office, in a memo to the
grant recipients, said the
severe budget situation has
caused the freeze on funding
for all general obligation
bond programs.
The action was taken to
preserve cash resources to
pay day-to-day operational
needs of the state for the
balance of the fiscal year.
The state Department of
Conservation ordered
suspension of all
grant-funded projects and
all payments on existing
grants and halted all
authorization of new grants.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with
Title 17 U.S.C. section 107,
any copyrighted
material herein is
distributed without profit
or payment to those who have
expressed a prior interest
in receiving this
information for non-profit
research and educational
purposes only. For more
information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
|