Fishery council
calls for removal of dams
Action proposed to restore Klamath River
salmon runs
Bob Krauter
Capital Press California Editor
4/14/2006
One day after it
approved the smallest salmon fishery season in the history of the West Coast,
the Pacific Fishery Management Council voted to support the removal of four
dams on the Klamath River.
The council, in a letter to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
recommended decommissioning and removing four lower Klamath River dams to
restore habitat for runs of Klamath salmon.
“When the council was discussing this issue, we heard a lot about poor
habitat conditions for salmon in the Klamath River,” Don Hansen, PFMC
chairman. “We also heard compelling testimony from many people –
commercial and recreational fisherman, environmentalists, communities –
calling for a solution to the habitat problems there.”
The four dams, Copco 1, Copco 2, Iron Gate and J.C. Boyle, are currently up
for relicensing by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. The PFMC letter
to the commission stated, “Habitat and fish passage in the Klamath Basin are
significantly affected by the presence of dams. Lack of fish passage at the
Klamath Project facilities blocks access to more than 400 miles of migration,
spawning and rearing habitat for salmon, steelhead and Pacific lamprey.”
Siskiyou County Supervisor Marcia Armstrong said it would be premature to
decommission the dams because of the substantial impact it would have on her
county and local residents.
“The hue and cry has been raised to tear down the dams on the Klamath.
Siskiyou County believes that it would be rash to rush into removal of the
Klamath River dams,” Armstrong said. “There are more than 1,600 property
owners around Copco Lake behind the lower complex of dams. In addition to
providing low-cost renewable energy from hydropower, these facilities provide
roughly $750,000 a year in tax revenue.”
Armstrong said there is no compelling data to demonstrate that dam removal is
the best answer to assist in the recovery of fish. She added that
alternatives, such as fish ladders, trucking and other means of bypassing the
dams have not received enough attention. She urged new approaches to solving
the problems on the Klamath “before all of our economies collapse.”
The council’s action on the Klamath River dams came on the heels of its
decision to close most of the 700 miles along the Oregon and California coast
to commercial salmon fishing for much of May, June and July.
Hundreds of people testified before the council, including large numbers of
commercial and recreational fishermen. John Coon, deputy director of the
council, said they were able to avoid a total closure with an emergency rule
that allows the fishery to remain open.
“The council really struggled with trying to keep the infrastructure in
place and to keep the communities from dying on the vine and still achieving a
meaningful salmon spawning escapement in the Klamath that would not impact
that stock in an overly negative way,” Coon said. “But this was also a
message that ‘we’re putting fish in that river and we want water in the
river.’ Maybe we will luck out with Mother Nature this year, but we can’t
count on Mother Nature. We’ve got to clean up the problems in that basin
with the dams and the diversions, and disease and so on.”
Roger Thomas, a member of the council and a representative of the Golden Gate
Fishermen’s Association, a group that represents commercial passenger
fishing vessels that serve recreational fishing interests, was relieved by the
decision.
“Looking from the standpoint of the fishery that I am in, we are satisfied,
but I have many friends and members of my association that also fish
commercially and it is dire straits for them, a serious disaster
economically,” Thomas said. “Lots of facilities like ice plants and fuel
docks in the various harbors are going out of business because they have
fisheries that no fishermen can fish in their particular area. Many of these
fishermen won’t be back next year because of it. It is really a sad
situation.”
For years, fishing and environmental groups have blamed diversions of water
for farming and the operation of dams for harming fish habitat in the river.
Marcia Armstrong and farming and timber interests have countered the criticism
with examples of voluntary habitat restoration efforts of farmers and
ranchers, especially those in the Scott and Shasta River Valleys of the
mid-Klamath, which is considered a prime spawning ground for salmon.
Bob Krauter is the Capital Press California editor based in Sacramento. Reach
him via e-mail at bkrauter@capitalpress.com.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who
have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Source: