Dave
Wilkins
Capital Press Staff Writer
January 13, 2006
LAS VEGAS – Idaho
potato growers aren’t getting enough for their 2005 crop spuds, especially
considering the crop was short, leaders said last week at an industry meeting.
Idaho farmers produced 15 million hundredweight fewer potatoes in 2005 than
they did the year before. That helped boost prices last fall to some of their
best levels in years.
But prices for Idaho russets have deteriorated since, with recent grower
returns as much as $2 per hundredweight below some other states.
The difference in prices was a topic of discussion last week at a United
Potato Growers of America board meeting in Las Vegas.
United Chairman Albert Wada of Idaho said growers in his home state should not
be satisfied with the $5.50 to $6 per hundredweight that they’ve been
receiving.
“It’s totally senseless,” Wada said in an interview after the meeting
which was held in conjunction with the National Potato Council’s annual
gathering. “Growers should be in charge of this. They should be able to say,
‘No, I won’t take $5.50 for my potatoes.’”
Returns in Washington state have been close to those in Idaho, but prices in
other major potato-producing states have been much better.
Grower returns in Colorado have risen to more than $8 per hundredweight for
spuds run through fresh-pack sheds. Wisconsin growers have been getting $8 to
$8.75 field-run prices for Norkotah shipments, and in the Klamath Basin,
growers have been receiving about $7 for Russet Burbanks and $8 for Russet
Norkotahs.
“We’re $2 below practically every other russet shipping state in the
nation, with the exception of Washington,” Wada said of the Idaho market.
Part of the difference can be attributed to the greater shipping distance from
Idaho to major markets.
“We have a freight disadvantage without a doubt, but our discount to the
market is much more than what the freight difference is,” Wada said.
Idaho growers are getting more for their spuds now than they did last year,
but they should be getting more based on the lower supply, he said.
“Obviously (growers) are thinking $6 is good enough, but quite frankly,
they’re leaving $2 on the table,” Wada said.
United leaders have been urging members to slow down 2005 shipments in
accordance with a national supply management plan, but it appears many Idaho
members aren’t following it.
“At our current shipping pace, we’re going to run out of potatoes before
the end of the season,” Wada said.
“Even though a good many of these packing sheds and sales entities are
United members, they’re still fighting it out daily ... to keep market
share,” he said.
If things don’t change, there could be a big spike in potato prices toward
the end of the shipping season this summer and perhaps a shortage of spuds.
If that happens, it won’t be good for major buyers, consumers or the potato
industry, Wada said.
Relatively few growers holding late season storage spuds will benefit from a
big price spike, and shortages could alienate customers.
“If we get the price too high and start running out of product, customers
and consumers will be forced to shift to other produce categories, and then we
will have to win them back,” Wada said.
U.S. Department of Agriculture stocks figures, as well as private data
collected from United members, do not support the rapid pace of Idaho potato
shipments this year, industry officials said.
“Either Idaho growers don’t believe the stocks numbers, as reported by
USDA, or Idaho shippers are more concerned about competing with their neighbor
in Idaho for market share than getting a fair return for all Idaho growers,”
said Keith Esplin, executive director of Potato Growers of Idaho.
Dave Wilkins is based in Twin Falls, Idaho. His email address is dwilkins@capitalpress.com.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who
have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Source: http://www.capitalpress.info/main.asp?Search=1&Article