Capital Press Editorial:  Its critical to find water solutions in the West

 
It’s about cooperation

Friday, March 11, 2005

Nowhere else has water been a more precious, and fought over, resource than in the American West.

Arid regions have become fertile, and populations have boomed and taken over areas that were once rich farmland. As pressure grew to supply urban areas with water for people, but also to protect endangered plants, animals and fish species in the West that also depend on the water, farmers and ranchers have felt even more squeezed.

Unfortunately, this has now become a time when litigation and courts have more frequently decided the fate of farmers. Many farm organizations, government agencies and even individuals admit a great deal of their resources are now spent preparing for or fighting litigation rather than concentrating on their still critical priorities.

In the Pacific Northwest, California and neighboring states, tough decisions will need to be made regarding how to share a dwindling resource. Drought, different interests demanding rights, urban growth pressure, the Endangered Species Act, environmental awareness, economics and many other factors impact the fate of water.

However, farmers and ranchers need to be acknowledged and praised for the steps they have taken to be more efficient and reduce the amount the water they use, share what they have, and in some cases work with normally opposing interests to resolve the situations that face them. This is not easy, but often is a slow and arduous process.

There are certain areas in the West that gained attention for their water battles or for the ways they are dealing with the challenges that face them.

The example of what must not be repeated: What happened to the Klamath Falls area in 2001 when, in the midst of a drought, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation decided because of the Endangered Species Act that water should go to three fish species instead of farmers.

Farmers had just planted and helplessly watched as their crops withered and died; many families and businesses in the community lost their livelihoods.

To the credit of federal and state officials, they are next week visiting the Klamath Basin to meet with the people affected by water decisions made, especially in times of drought. They appear to want to cooperate and collaborate to find a solution that will hopefully never impact agriculture as severely as it was in 2001.

In Idaho, the current proposed Nez Perce Agreement is closely watched for how it involved so many interests and could protect Idaho from the Endangered Species Act for a minimum of 30 years.

And in California, an eye is being kept on the Metropolitan Water District that involves 26 cities and water districts that have bought or are negotiating to buy water for almost 18 million people in Southern California.

Washington state has farmers in the Bertrand Creed watershed doing a pilot project to use more underground sources of water so fish have more surface water.

In some cases, Indian tribes have been some of the farmers’ opponents when it comes to fighting for water, while in other cases they work cooperatively with farmers to develop the best plans for the future.

Bob Kelly, director of Natural Resources for the Nooksack Indian Tribe, explained why it is valuable to cooperate. “We need farmland to stay in farming. If a 200-acre farm goes out, we could end up with 200 homes there, and those homes will use more water. It’s in our best interest to support farmers as well as the needs of fish.”

The governor of Idaho, Dirk Kempthorne, warned that if water issues such as the Snake River Basin Adjudication aren’t resolved through the cooperation of various players and ratification later by government, the issues will wind through the courts for years.

“What year will that come down? How many millions of dollars later, and how many bank loans may not be loaned because of the uncertainty?” he told farm groups recently at the Idaho Ag Summit in Boise.

That is why it is so critical to find solutions to what is happening with water in the West.

Banks and businesses want certainty that agriculture will continue to exist and prosper.

Farmers and ranchers want certainty that the next generation will have the precious water needed to grow the next crop, raise the next batch of calves born, and nurture the hundreds of commodities produced in the West that make this area so valuable agriculturally to the rest of the country and to the world.

Now is the time for all the players to work toward solutions and ensuring water is guaranteed to meet agricultural needs for the future.

 
 
 


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material  herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have
expressed  a  prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and  educational purposes only. For more information go to:
 http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml



Source: 
http://www.capitalpress.info/Main.asp?SectionID=75&SubSectionID=767&ArticleID=15778