Become a friend of

   the Klamath Bucket  

            Brigade

   Send Donations Here

     All donations are tax  

             deductible

 

 

 This Website is Dedicated to

 Alvin Alexander Cheyne

January 10, 1921 - June 17, 2005

 

GovTrack.us is an independent tool to help the public research and track the activities in the U.S. Congress, promoting government transparency and civic education through novel uses of technology.

 

 

 

 

      

 

  
March rainfall
Here's the precipitation that selected California cities have received so far for the month and for the season, according to the National Weather Service. Totals are as of Tuesday, March 24:

Redding (airport): month to date 1.15 inches (normal 4.05); season to date 18.51 inches (normal 27.67)

Sacramento (airport): month to date 2.09 inches (normal 2.25); season to date 13.30 inches (normal 15.63)

Modesto: month to date 0.70 inches (normal 1.81); season to date 6.90 inches (normal 11.04)

Salinas: month to date 1.79 inches (normal 1.89); season to date 10.91 inches (normal 11.19)

Fresno: month to date 0.24 inches (normal 1.75); season to date 6.39 inches (normal 9.40)

Bakersfield: month to date 0.36 inches (normal 1.12); season to date 4.14 inches (normal 5.39)

More water likely

Conditions improve, but state reservoirs still below average

Tim Hearden
Capital Press

March 26, 2009

California farmers and ranchers stand a better chance of getting at least some federal water than they did a month ago.

The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation issued its updated allocation forecast March 20, predicting that as much as 15 percent of average agricultural deliveries may be available for Central Valley Project contractors.

Pete Lucero, the bureau's spokesman in Sacramento, said the allocations could improve again when the agency issues its next updated allocation forecast on or about April 20.

"This one just takes into account the March 1 snow surveys and runoff data. It doesn't take into account this month so far," Lucero said. "We had pretty significant rainfall early in the month and that data wasn't used."

But as they've been warning all winter, state water officials insist there's still a long way to go before water levels are anything like normal.

If the state Department of Water Resources' prediction of 65 percent of normal runoff for the year comes true, the three-year period ending this year would still be among the driest 8 percent on record, said Steve Nemeth, a civil engineer and water supply forecaster for the agency.

Unfortunately, help in the form of abundant rainstorms doesn't appear to be on the horizon. California has returned to a drier-than-normal weather pattern, and only one model is predicting significant rainfall next week, National Weather Service meteorologist Cindy Palmer said.

Long-term forecasts suggest both above-average temperatures and a pattern of periodic atmospheric troughs that produce rainfall, Palmer said.

"I'm not ready to say the rainy season's over," she said. "It's still only April, but we are looking at a dry forecast for the next week."

In its latest update of allocations for CVP contractors, the Bureau of Reclamation predicted March 20 that 5 percent to 15 percent of normal water deliveries would be available for agriculture north of the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta.

In the San Joaquin Valley, a zero-water scenario is still possible unless runoff levels reach 61 percent of average, at which point all Central Valley Project contractors would get 15 percent of what they would normally expect for agriculture.

North of the Delta, urban areas would get 55 percent of their water under the dry forecast or 65 percent if the median runoff amount is reached - an achievement that the Bureau predicts has a 50 percent chance of coming true. South of the delta, residential areas would received 50 percent to 65 percent of their water.

Wildlife reserves and water rights holders everywhere would receive between 75 percent and 100 percent of their normal allocations, depending on the amount of runoff that accumulates this spring.

The bureau will continue to issue monthly updates through May or later, depending on how much new information on runoff it receives from the state, Lucero said.

The March 20 update followed the state Department of Water Resources' announcement that it will increase water from state reservoirs from 15 percent of what was requested to 20 percent. Despite recent rains, state officials have been warning that the state remains in a dangerous drought.

Much of California received above-average rainfall and copious amounts of mountain snow in February and early March, increasing the Sierra Nevada snowpack to about 90 percent of normal.

But state reservoirs are still well below average and precipitation totals in March have fallen below normal in many areas.

As of Tuesday, March 24, Redding's 1.15 inches of rainfall for the month was well below the normal amount of 4.05 inches, while Fresno's 0.24 inches lag well below the 1.75 inches the city usually records by this time of the month.

Meanwhile, Shasta Lake was at 63 percent of its capacity, while Lake Oroville was at 53 percent and Millerton Lake was at 71 percent as of midnight Monday, March 23, according to the state Department of Water Resources California Data Exchange Center.

Court-ordered cutbacks in diversions of water from the delta already had farmers in the San Joaquin Valley scrambling for alternative water sources while planning for a dry year.

The Bureau of Reclamation made farmers' prospects even bleaker on Feb. 20, when it announced there would likely be no agricultural water available for Central Valley Project contractors. The best the bureau could hope for at the time was to deliver 10 percent of average allocations to farmers.

The state's latest forecast comes after the State Department of Water Resources on March 10 predicted that California would record 65 percent of normal runoff for the current water year and 75 percent of average runoff from April through July.

That's 10 percent more water than the state had foreseen when looking at Feb. 1 runoff totals, which Reclamation used as the basis for its zero-water scenario.

State officials said they still expected the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers to finish the season with flow levels at critical - the driest of six designations assigned by the state.

Though February precipitation was well above average statewide, runoff was only 65 percent of average for the month, according to the Department of Water Resources' report.

Even a little water is better than none, said Ivar Amen, a Cottonwood hay and livestock grower and president of the Shasta County Farm Bureau.

"It will (make a difference) for some guys," Amen said. "Any water can make a difference. ... I just hope the rest of the state can get more than 10 percent."

Staff writer Tim Hearden is based in Shasta Lake. E-mail: thearden@capitalpress.com.
 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material  herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have
expressed  a  prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and  educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml