New direction for salmon recovery


Better hatchery management, smaller catch in new plan

Mitch Lies
Capital Press Staff Writer

February 3, 2006

The Bush administration last week provided what farm and forest industry leaders called sorely needed direction when it unveiled a salmon recovery plan that calls for reducing harvest and improving hatchery management.

Chris West, vice president of the American Forest Resource Council, said the plan will lead to increased salmon runs without altering the region’s dependence on dams.

“In the long run, this (policy) will be better for salmon and for the people who live and work here,” West said.

Natural resources leaders also said the plan validates the voluntary work done by farmers and foresters over the past decade to improve salmon habitat.

“I think it’s a success story,” said Oregon Farm Bureau President Barry Bushue. “It is vindication that our commitment ... to voluntary programs is one piece of the puzzle.”

“We’re the ones who gave up our evenings and weekends working on watershed councils,” West said. “We’re the ones who got dirt under our fingernails.”

The administration’s plan calls for transforming the Northwest’s hatcheries from factories producing fish for fisheries to state-of-the-art facilities designed to restore populations.

“We need to ensure that our hatchery facilities are up to date. ... We need to mimic natural production and selection processes, not harm them,” James L. Connaughton, chairman of the White House Council on Environmental Quality, said in introducing the new plan.

In calling for a reduction of harvest levels, Connaughton said:

“We have in years past taken steps to reduce the amount of threatened and endangered salmon we catch, but we are still catching them at levels that warrant reassessment. This is a paradox for an administration committed to end overfishing, and we are going to resolve it.”

West applauded the strategy, saying: “If we are going to recover species, taking of species needs to have a harder look.” In the long run, he said, the strategy will result in the recovery of salmon populations to harvestable levels.

The strategy was scorned by the fishing industry, which claimed that trimming the minor impact they inflict on salmon runs will not restore wild fish populations.

“All commercial, recreational and tribal harvests combined account for 5 percent of the human-induced mortality in the system,” said Glen Spain, Northwest regional director of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Association. “Meanwhile, the hydropower system accounts for 80 percent.”

Instead of reducing the harvest, Spain said the administration should consider removing the four lower Snake River dams:

“I would be overjoyed if there was any demonstrable way to improve the runs without removing dams,” Spain said, “but the biology doesn’t say it’s possible at this point.”

Connaughton said in his presentation that the administration is advancing the plan as part of shifting its focus from avoiding extinction to promoting recovery of endangered salmon runs. Connaughton said the administration stands firmly behind the dams, but said more improvements in dams would be necessary to meet administration goals.

“The hydropower system has made significant improvements,” he said. “These improvements will need to be sustained and enhanced as part of an overall recovery strategy if we are to be successful.”

Charles Hudson, spokesman for the Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission, said he liked aspects of the plan that showed the administration recognizes the sovereignty of tribal fishing rights. And he agreed with the administration’s assessment that hatchery management needs improvements. But, he said, the administration is wrong to promote harvest reductions.

“We have concerns about the administration’s attempt to redirect attention to what we view hands-down as the most intensively managed of the four H’s — harvest,” he said.

The new strategy also is an attempt by the administration to advance a more comprehensive approach than has been used in the past to recover salmon, Connaughton said — an approach taking into account what are commonly referred to as the four H’s: harvest, hatchery, habitat and hydropower.

“It is time to press ahead and find a way to more effectively put all of the H’s to work in the context of a better integrated — instead of an ad hoc and piecemeal — approach,” Connaughton said.

Farm and forest industry leaders called on the Northwest’s political delegation to support the plan by funding hatchery improvements and providing low-interest loans or other support programs to offset short-term revenue losses fisheries are expected to suffer under the strategy.

Mitch Lies is based in Salem. His e-mail address is mlies@capitalpress.com.
 
 



+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material  herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have
expressed  a  prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and  educational purposes only. For more information go to:
 http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml


Source:  http://www.capitalpress.info/main.asp?SectionID=

67&SubSectionID=792&ArticleID=22742