|







|
Become a friend of
the Klamath Bucket
Brigade
Send
Donations Here
All donations are tax
deductible
|
|
This Website is Dedicated to
Alvin Alexander Cheyne
January
10, 1921 - June 17, 2005
|
|
|

Senators
speak up in defense of potatoes
USDA
wants to drop spuds from federal WIC program
Cookson
Beecher
Capital Press
April 11, 2008
Led by Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., a bipartisan group of U.S. senators
has joined forces in an effort to have fresh white-fleshed potatoes
included in a nutrition program for low-income families.
In an interim rule recently published by USDA, the potatoes would be
excluded from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women,
Infants and Children, commonly known as WIC.
In a statement provided to the Washington State Potato Commission,
Murray
said the state's potato
industry and consumers deserve better than "this poorly thought out
and contradictory rule."
"I will continue to work to ensure that potatoes are not unfairly
targeted for exclusion from WIC programs," she said.
In her efforts on behalf of the industry,
Murray
has gathered support from
fellow
U.S.
senators and sent a letter
to the chairs and ranking members of the conference committee addressing
the farm bill.
The letter requests that potatoes be included in the WIC program.
"While we support the USDA's efforts to update the Women, Infants
and Children Program to include more fruits and vegetables, we are
concerned by the exclusion of white potatoes in the new
regulation," says the letter.
In 2003, as part of an update of WIC, the
Institute
of
Medicine
addressing the importance
of expanding WIC to include fruits and vegetables.
However, it recommended that potatoes be excluded.
In 2006, the USDA proposed a rule to revise the WIC food packages, based
in large part on those recommendations.
In December 2007, USDA published the interim rule.
Murray
said she finds the
recommendation to exclude potatoes from the WIC program troubling
"because it is in sharp contradiction to the report's nutritional
findings.
"It is illogical that USDA has excluded from the final WIC package
a vegetable that contains at least four of the vitamins that are
inadequate in the American diet," says the letter.
Taking a similar tack, Karen Bonaudi, assistant executive director of
the Washington State Potato Commission, said that excluding the potatoes
runs contrary to the "fresh fruit and vegetable reformation"
that's picking up support across the nation.
"It's ironic that fresh potatoes would be left out of the
'reformation,'" she said.
According to industry research, potatoes are a source of potassium,
vitamin C, fiber and many B vitamins.
The letter also notes that singling out potatoes for exclusion will
create confusion among WIC program participants and administrative
burdens for grocers and vendors.
Following Sen. Murray's lead, Sens. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash.; Ron Wyden,
D-Ore.; Gordon Smith, R-Ore.; Mike Crapo, R-Idaho; Larry Craig, R-Idaho;
Olympia Snowe, R-Maine: Ken Salazar, D-Colo.; Susan Collins, R-Maine;
Robert Casey, D-Pa.; and Carl Levin, D-Mich., have also signed the
letter.
WIC is a federally funded special supplemental nutrition program for
low-income and nutritionally at-risk women and their children through 5
years of age. Currently, over 50 percent of all infants born in the
U. S.
each year and 25 percent of
all young children participate in the WIC program.
WIC serves 8.2 million people each year who receive vouchers for
specific foods. WIC food packages, valued at about $38 per month,
currently do not include fruits and vegetables and have not been
significantly updated in 32 years.
Staff writer Cookson Beecher is based in
Sedro-Woolley
,
Wash.
E-mail: cbeecher@capitalpress.com.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those
who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go
to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Source:
http://www.capitalpress.info/main.asp?SectionID=67&SubSection
ID=792&ArticleID=40790
|