|







|
Become a friend of
the Klamath Bucket
Brigade
Send
Donations Here
All donations are tax
deductible
|
|
This Website is Dedicated to
Alvin Alexander Cheyne
January
10, 1921 - June 17, 2005
|
|
|

Wetland
vindication: Pasture wetlands help filter runoff
Short
of potty training cattle, maintaining wetlands is best, says research
Don
Curlee
For the Capital Press
January 25, 2008
What a relief! Researchers at the
University
of
California
have found that wetlands
have some benefits for the farmers and ranchers on whose land they are
found.
The finding comes after two decades of incessant drumming by
environmentalists claiming that something good can come from the bogs
and swamps that dot the land.
Endless regulations to protect and preserve them have been developed,
particularly at the federal level.
Even with the stimulating news that the overgrown puddles provide more
than shelter for weeds, frogs, salamanders, mosquitoes, algae and
several other insects and assorted wildlife, many farmers with unsightly
year-around mud holes are still likely to think of them as unproductive
nuisances.
But the researchers have found that levels of E. coli, for example, in
streams draining some of
California
's range country are reduced by an average of 74 percent when
they run through a wetland.
In other words, the bacteria level of water draining out of a wetland is
lower than it is in the stream that feeds it.
Before encountering the wetland, a typical stream is likely to pick up
any number of bacteria from cattle, wild animal and bird feces or other
sources along its meandering way.
Reporting in the October-December issue of California Agriculture, the
university's research magazine, researchers Kate Knox, Kenneth W. Tate,
Randy A. Dahlgren and Edward R. Atwill said the filtering effect of a
wetland is one of three steps that can be taken to reduce the amount of
bacteria in streams that drain irrigated pastures.
The other two preventive measures are reduction of the runoff rate and
resting the pasture from grazing(clearing out all the animals) for a
week before irrigation water is applied. Doing so allows manure patties
to dry and be less likely to pollute the streams.
The latter preventive procedure, of course, depends on having an
alternate site where the cattle can be moved.
Not surprisingly, the research team found that a combination of all
three preventive measures was the most effective.
The study by the four
Davis
researchers was done on a 12-acre flood-irrigated pasture in
the northern
Sierra Nevada
foothills, somewhat typical
of what the authors described as "a patchwork of irrigated
perennial grass and clover pastures interspersed with annual grassland
and oak woodland."
Such sites make up about 800,000 acres of
California
's pastureland. The pasture
was irrigated six times in 2004, and six times in 2005 as the study was
undertaken. "Results from this study," the authors said,
"indicate that passing tailwater through relatively small wetlands
can significantly reduce E. coli from irrigated pastures."
In another part of the same publication, two other forms of tailwater
filtration were pictured: a portable wetland on a trailer - you have to
see it to believe it - parked at a nursery, and a series of 5- to
10-foot vertical pipes filled with sand. Logically enough, they are
called sand filtration columns.
Short of potty training the cattle and other species that roam foothill
pasturelands, or letting the pastures dry up altogether, maintaining the
wetlands seems to provide multiple benefits. And if tadpoles are among
your favorite things, locate your friendly neighborhood wetland and
offer your congratulations.
Don Curlee is a veteran ag publications editor and ag freelancer in
Clovis
,
Calif.
E-mail: agwriter1@sbcglobal.net.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those
who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go
to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Source:
http://www.capitalpress.info/main.asp?SectionID=84&Sub
SectionID=777&ArticleID=38677
|