Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission Comments
Greetings,
Thanks
you for the opportunity to comment On PacifiCorps relicensing
application for the Klamath Hydro project.
I
have worked in the Klamath River watershed for almost the last 50
years, the term of the license, and potentially the term of a new one.
Much
has changed in that time including myself. Years ago I worked and
lived at the mouth of the Klamath in the little town of Requa. I
worked in a timber industry that was thriving and on my time off,
would rent a boat and fish for salmon in the river, which were also
thriving.
Now
I am living and working at the other end of the river, the headwaters
in Klamath Falls. I no longer work in the timber industry, though I am
a general contractor and as for fishing, I am a professional guide and
spend as much time as I can on the water with clients, showcasing the
Klamath watershed, and advocating for water quality and sustainable
ecosystems (including the human).
During
this time I have served on the Upper Klamath Basin Working Group (5
years as co-chair), the Department of Agriculture Water Quality Area
Management Plan (3 years as Chair), the Department of Environmental
Quality Advisory Committee for the Upper Klamath Lake TMDL, and many
other natural resource based organizations.
I
mention this only to reference the fact that I have spent a great deal
of time and thought on the Klamath and my considered opinion is that
to achieve the goals so many of us in the watershed strive for, the
dams must go.
The
benchmark is water quality and the way to establish it is through a
free flowing river.
The
salmon, the social and economic issues, the fish or farm disconnect
and the native American disenfranchisement, all are impacted by the
impoundments behind the so appropriately named Iron Gate Dam.
Over
the years this had led to the perception that there is an Upper and a
Lower Basin, but in reality it is one watershed, and holistic planning
for it’s health and sustainability would best be served by removing
the barriers between the two.
The
arguments against removing the dams for the most part seem to be
economic, forgone revenue, cost of decommissioning, etc., and yet that
is only one side of the ledger when the full value of the ecosystem
services a free flowing and functional river provides are factored in,
I believe the economic benefits would outweigh the liabilities. Many
responsible people say the defining issue of this next century will be
water, and where is there a better opportunity to get it right than
the magnificent Klamath?
Sincerely
Jim
Carpenter
Carpenter
Design, Inc.
Klamath
Falls, Oregon