Questioning feds' authority
By Steve Mankowski, Lander, Wyoming
The Casper Star-Tribune
August 19, 2010
Editor:
The ongoing national government
shenanigans regarding grizzly bears, wolves and sage grouse (among
others) have prompted me to ask a politically incorrect question,
i.e., what, exactly, is the constitutional underpinning of the
Endangered Species Act (ESA)?
I can't feature how identifying and
protecting endangered species is one of the limited powers given up
by the sovereign states of the federal union and assigned to the
national government. Without major mental gyrations I can't even
imagine how a "penumbra" of authority can be derived from the
limited powers assigned to the national government.
I will concede only that under our
form of federal government the national government has unlimited
powers (within the constraints of the Bill of Rights) on federal
territories that have not acquired statehood, lands formally ceded
by the states to the national government such as the District of
Columbia, and military forts, arsenals and bases. I have no problem
with the national authorities exercising the provisions of the ESA
over these lands to their heart's content.
I contend that on all other lands
within the boundaries of the separate and sovereign states of the
federal union, the national government can implement the provisions
of the ESA only with at least the implicit consent of each sovereign
state. Should any of the sovereign states object at any time to this
national government intrusion into their sovereignty, they have the
power, nay, the responsibility, to throw the agents of the national
government out on their ears in accordance with the doctrine of
nullification.
Something for all of us to think
about.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any
copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those
who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml