






|
Become a friend of
the Klamath Bucket
Brigade
Send
Donations Here
All donations are tax
deductible
|
|
This Website is Dedicated to
Alvin Alexander Cheyne
January
10, 1921 - June 17, 2005
|

GovTrack.us is an independent tool to help the public
research and track the activities in the U.S. Congress, promoting
government transparency and civic education through novel uses of
technology.
|
|

Klamath Dam Removal
Introduced into Oregon Legislature
P R E S S R E L E A S E
For Immediate Release: February 3, 2009
For more information:
Craig Tucker, Karuk Tribe: 916-207-8294
James Honey, Sustainable Northwest: 503-314-1072
Jeff Mitchell, Klamath Tribes: 541-891-5971
Greg Addington, Klamath Water Users Association: 541-892-1409
Karl Scronce, Upper Klamath Water Users Association: 541-281-2053
Bob Jenks, Citizens Utility Board: 503-753-1490
Glen Spain, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations:
541-689-2000
DIVERSE GROUPS AND INTERESTS SUPPORT KLAMATH BILL IN OREGON LEGISLATURE
- Dam removal is first step in realizing comprehensive Klamath Basin
Agreement to benefit farms and fish
- Bill provides ratepayer protections in the context of a
solutions-oriented settlement.
Salem, OR – Today lawmakers introduced a bill that would direct funds
from PacifiCorp power bills to remove dams instead of paying millions
more for federally mandated dam upgrades. Affected Tribes, fishermen,
conservationists, ratepayer advocacy groups, and even dam owner
PacifiCorp, support the legislation. The legislation is a first step to
restoring fisheries and stabilizing tribal, agricultural and fishing
economies in the Klamath Basin – as mapped out in the Klamath Basin
Restoration Agreement.
“Governor Kulongoski has helped negotiate a win-win-win situation that
we hope legislators will support,” said Jeff Mitchell, Klamath Tribal
council member and long time dam removal advocate. “Tribes and fishermen
win because we will recover salmon runs, farmers win because dam removal
is a cornerstone of our water sharing agreement, and PacifiCorp and
their customers win because they control costs.”
The legislation is based on a dam removal “agreement in principle”
signed by PacifiCorp, Oregon, California, and the United States last
November. The legislation essentially caps PacifiCorp ratepayers’
contribution to dam removal at $200 million. Without the legislation
PacifiCorp’s ratepayers would have to pay the full cost of relicensing
the aging dams, including mitigation measures such as fish ladders that,
at a minimum, will cost the same as removal. Additional costs for
addressing water quality issues such as toxic algal blooms are yet to be
determined by regulatory agencies, but could add millions more. Groups
argue that dam removal solves these problems in a more cost effective
manner.
A broad-based coalition of organizations representing diverse interests
has been working since 2005 to bring peace and sustainable solutions to
the Klamath Basin. This bi-partisan, cooperative effort deserves
support, say participants:
“Legislative solutions should offer benefits for more than just one
interest,” says James Honey, Program Director for Sustainable Northwest.
“This legislation and the companion Restoration Agreement is the most
promising option to end the Klamath crisis.” Dam removal is a key
feature of the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement released early last
year. However, the Agreement also settles many long standing water
disputes between Tribes and farmers, increases flows for fish, invests
in rural economic development to support tribal and agricultural
communities, and provides a coordinated approach to fisheries
restoration, from the Klamath’s headwaters to the sea.
The Klamath Water Users Association, which represents farmers and
ranchers who lost access to irrigation water in 2001, supports the bill.
Executive Director Greg Addington explains, “We see the legislation as
one component of the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement, which can
bring stability to a region known mostly for its instability. The
package of measures provides increased water security for farmers, helps
us with energy issues, and provides landowners with tools to ensure that
reintroduction of salmon to the Upper Basin doesn’t make it even harder
to earn a living in agriculture.”
Oregon fishermen also support the bill: “Oregon’s commercial salmon
fishery is worth more than the small amount of power these particular
dams produce,” says Mike Becker, a commercial salmon fisherman from
Newport. “We can replace the relatively small number of megawatts from
the hydro project. But we can’t replace the salmon runs on the Klamath
River. When the fish suffer, so do our coastal communities.”
While not a part of the coalition of groups working in the Basin, the
Citizen’s Utility Board (CUB), a ratepayer advocacy group, also supports
the Governor’s legislation.
An informational hearing on SB 76 will be held in the Senate Environment
and Natural Resources Committee, Tuesday, February 3rd. The hearing is
scheduled for 3 p.m.
# # #
S. Craig Tucker, Ph.D.
Klamath Campaign Coordinator
Karuk Tribe of California
NEW NUMBER home office: 707-839-1982
Tribal office in Orleans: 530-627-3446 x3027
cell: 916-207-8294
ctucker [at] karuk.us
http://www.karuk.us
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any
copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those
who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
|