![]() |
| World Photo by Madeline Steege Rigging used for salmon fishing frames other boats in the Charleston Marina on Wednesday afternoon. The Pacific Fishery Management Council voted Friday to allow recreational fishing during March and April in Southern Oregon. |
SEATTLE - What was already a long week of fishery
management discussions got longer on Friday as managers struggled again with
salmon season proposals for 2006.
The Pacific Fishery Management Council and its advisory bodies plugged
numbers into computer models, considered alternative fishing methods and
seasons, and requested more ideas from scientists and the fishing industry -
all in an effort to afford commercial and recreational fishermen some kind
of a season while accounting for the health of the Klamath River fall
Chinook population.
It's at the March council meeting that managers usually determine three
preliminary options for recreational and commercial fishing seasons for the
upcoming summer. Those options are then published for public review and
public hearings are held in all three states (see sidebar) so managers can
get an idea of which options would best suit the fishing industry. The
council then makes final determinations at its April meeting.
But this year is much, much different: Predicted numbers
of wild Klamath River fall Chinook are low, almost the lowest on record and
that fish is a significant component of commercial fisheries in Southern
Oregon.
The fishery management plan for salmon, approved by the National Marine
Fisheries Service years ago, recommends closing the fishery if the numbers
of wild returning spawners to the Klamath are fewer than 35,000 for three
years in a row, and 2006 will be that third year.
It was that kind of dire circumstance that garnered the attention of two
members of Congress.
Reps. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore. and David Wu, D-Ore., submitted letters to the
council regarding potential closures of the sport and commercial fishing
seasons.
“We ask you to repudiate NOAA's recommendation,” the letter from DeFazio
and Wu said. “NOAA's recommendation is the result of bad federal policy in
Oregon's Klamath Basin. ... The (council) must use real science as the basis
of its decision and develop a real solution for salmon.”
Much of the trouble centers around a computer model - the Klamath Harvest
Model, referred to as the KHM - used to forecast potential Klamath River
Chinook impacts based on different information such as seasons, area
closures, minimum size limits and quotas. The model hasn't performed well
for the last few years.
What it can't take into account are such things as weekly limits. Some of
the fishing season options included allowing trollers to retain only 50 fish
per week, the first time that weekly limits have been included in the
options, but the Klamath model can't figure that into its computations.
“We've looked at it and some quite knowledgeable team
members have concluded we don't have a way to model landing limits through
the KHM process,” Salmon Technical Team Chairman Dell Simmons said.
It's been frustrating for fishermen.
Salmon Advisory Subpanel Chairman and commercial troller Don Stevens said
the advisers weren't often briefed on what changes the technical team was
doing during the weeklong meeting.
“This is real trying this year,” Stevens said, noting that one member of
the panel was so frustrated that he quit and returned to California early.
“The team worked long and hard with no consultation with the (salmon
panel).”
The council directed the technical team - a group consisting of scientists
from the three state agencies, the tribes, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service - to run through the KHM
again on Friday after council members made adjustments to already limited
season options.
Most of the optimistic options for Oregon commercial trollers between Cape
Falcon and the California border include limited days in May and June and
some fishing in September and October with some weekly trip limits of 50
fish added in during the fall and with no - none, zero, zip - commercial
fishing at all below Humbug Mountain south of Port Orford because of the
area's proximity to the Klamath River.
On the pessimistic end of the scale, the option is to include no fishing at
all in Oregon south of Cape Falcon.
The middle options for the areas of Cape Falcon to the South Jetty at
Florence and the Florence South Jetty to Cape Arago include no fishing in
October, and weekly limits of 100, 75 or 50 fish per vessel per week,
depending on the month. There also would be no fishing between Cape Arago
and Humbug and only some fishing days in September between Humbug and the
California border with a 1,500 Chinook quota.
None of the options includes fishing seasons in July or August, similar to
the closures last year. Neither do the options include any commercial
fishing in March or April (see sidebar).
Gold Beach commercial fisherman and Fishermen Direct Seafoods owner Scott
Boley said Friday the outlook is not good.
“It will force us to buy our fish for our seafood market in Coos Bay - or
further north,” Boley said.
Recreational fishermen in Oregon fared better - sport fishermen and charter
boat companies between Cape Falcon and Humbug Mountain will have options on
the optimistic side for a full Chinook season between March 15 and October.
South of Humbug to Horse Mountain in Northern California, sport fishermen
will be limited to a handful of days in May, all of June, a handful of
fishing days in July, and some days at the end of August and beginning of
September.
The pessimistic option, as for the commercial trollers, consists of no
fishing whatsoever below Humbug Mountain. The season between Cape Falcon and
Humbug would be limited to March 15 through April 30.
The middle option limits some days of sports fishing, but also has various
options for the selective coho fishing opportunity in the middle of summer.
The council will meet again in April to take final action on salmon seasons.
On the Web:
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife: http://www.dfw.state.or.us/
National Marine Fisheries Service: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/