|







|
Become a friend of
the Klamath Bucket
Brigade
Send
Donations Here
All donations are tax
deductible
|
|
This Website is Dedicated to
Alvin Alexander Cheyne
January
10, 1921 - June 17, 2005
|
|
|

No
salmon in 2008?
By
Susan Chambers, Staff Writer
January
30, 2008
COOS
BAY
— Here we go again.
The complete closure of commercial salmon fishing in
Southern Oregon
and
Northern California
in 2006 could repeat in
2008.
In 2006,
it was due expected low returns of spawning Chinook to the
Klamath River
.
This year, it’s
Central California
rivers, primarily the
Sacramento
, that could drive cutbacks
to commercial and recreational salmon fishermen.
And in a cruel twist, the
Klamath River
this year had fairly good runs — a situation that would normally
put /southern
Oregon
fishermen’s fears at ease.
The Portland-based Pacific Fishery Management Council, which determines
fishing seasons and regulations to be approved by the National Marine
Fisheries Service, still is verifying numbers, but those numbers likely
won’t change much, PFMC Executive Director Don McIsaac said in an
e-mail to council members.
Only 90,414 adult fall Chinooks returned to
Central Valley
rivers in 2007, according
to the preliminary figures. The last time returns were that low was in
1992, when returns were only 82,625. The average returns between 1970
and 2006 are 253,778.
“The Klamath could dampen the impact, but it’s a little early to
know for sure yet,” council member Frank Warrens said.
Still, that’s not settling well with some local trollers. They have
one word on their minds: disaster.
Where are the salmon?
Charleston
salmon fisherman Rick Goche
is worried. He’s been working on trying to get federal assistance for
the 2007 season.
Some argue that fishermen could fish in 2007, whereas their boats were
tied to the dock for the whole year in 2006 and for three months in
2005. Where is the disaster in 2007?
“We didn’t catch them,” Goche said of the Chinook that weren’t
biting their hooks. “We fished hard all year long, but the fish
weren’t where the fleet was.”
The 2007 season also had some closed areas, but not as many as in 2006.
It was in those closed areas that fishermen hoped the Chinook were
hiding.
They weren’t.
“When the returns started being counted, it started to become obvious
that the fish weren’t there, either,” Goche said.
The whole situation has federal fishery managers baffled.
“There was a general decline in 2007 Chinook returns coastwide except
for the Klamath,” PFMC salmon staff officer Chuck Tracy said in an
e-mail.
A wide impact
The Klamath River’s disastrous problems during the last few years
could be just a fraction of the impacts from the
Central Valley
rivers in
California
.
The runs are bigger on the
Sacramento
and, for the most part, the
most stable runs of the three main salmon-producing rivers that include
the Klamath and the
Columbia
.
“This is particularly disconcerting in that this stock has
consistently been the healthy “work horse” target stock for salmon
fisheries off
California
and most of
Oregon
,” McIsaac said in the
e-mail to council members.
It also provides salmon catches to fishermen in
Washington
and as far away as
British Columbia
,
Canada
.
To say that it won’t affect
Oregon
fishermen is something
managers and fishermen aren’t even considering.
It will — in the same way
Klamath River
runs affected both
Oregon
and
California
fishermen for the past few
years, thanks to the mixed-stock management system.
A Klamath Chinook looks the same as a
Sacramento
fish. Or a
Columbia River
Chinook. Or any Chinook
from a number of coastal streams. There’s no way for fishermen to tell
whether the sleek silver fish on the end of their hooks are from which
rivers, without a detailed DNA analysis.
Thus the reason to manage conservatively.
And fishermen are getting ready.
“I’m worried about us having a season at all in 2008,”
Charleston
troller Jeff Reeves said.
“I will be involved in the council process. With the loss of Scott
Boley, several of us are going to try to take his place.”
Boley was a steadfast supporter of the fishing industry, understood the
science behind fishery management and was able to work with both
fishermen and managers for the benefit of both. He died in 2007.
Reeves said the fishermen have a huge task ahead of them, since there
has been no significant problem on the
Sacramento River
in the past 35 years or more.
“We’re
in unexplored territory,” he said.
Getting
involved
Fishermen will
have several opportunities over the next few months to get involved in
planning for the 2008 salmon seasons.
* The Pacific Fishery Management Council will publish its Review of 2007
Ocean Salmon Fisheries and Preseason Reports through April. The first
report will be available to the public no later than Feb. 24. For more
information, those interested can visit the council’s Web site at http://www.pcouncil.org
.
* The Pacific Fishery Management Council will meet March 7-14 in
Sacramento
,
Calif.
, to select three options
for 2008 salmon seasons. Public testimony will be taken. For more
information, those interested can visit the council’s Web site at http://www.pcouncil.org
.
* The Pacific Fishery Management Council will hold public hearings on
salmon season options. Locally, that hearing will be held March 31 in
Coos
Bay
.
* The Pacific Fishery Management Council will meet April 6-12 in
Seattle
to make a final decision
about 2008 salmon season. Public testimony will be taken. For more
information, those interested can visit the council’s Web site at http://www.pcouncil.org
.
* The Oregon Ocean Salmon Industry Group Meeting will be held from
9 a.m.
to
3:30 p.m.
on Thursday, March 6, at
the Best Western Agate Beach Inn,
3019 North Coast Highway
101,
Newport
. Tentative agenda items
include a review of the 2007 season, 2007 spawner escapements, 2008 coho
and Chinook abundance forecasts, issues affecting the 2008 season
structure and
Oregon
preferred 2008 season
options by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, commercial
fishermen and recreational fishermen. The agenda will be posted on the
ODFW and Oregon Coastal Zone Management Association Web sites about two
weeks before the meeting. For more information, those interested can
call the OCZMA at (541) 265-8918 or by e-mail to Georgia York at georgia_york@class.oregonvos.net.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those
who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go
to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Source:
http://www.theworldlink.com/articles/2008/01/31/news/doc47a0c373af547905644500.txt
|