|
|
|
|
|
A
wave breaks off the southern |
Several crabbers, salmon trollers and beach trawlers met Monday at the
Charleston Marina RV Park recreation center to learn about what many
viewed as the next threat to their livelihood.
“It kind of feels like a gold rush,” Oregon Coastal Zone Management
Association Executive Director Onno Husing, said.
Husing was one of the organizers of the meeting, designed as an informal
get-together to learn about two potential wave-energy parks proposed for
ocean areas off
To date, seven projects are proposed for the
Rumors abound about other projects proposed but that haven't been
officially filed with FERC.
The
bottom line, Husing started to say, phrasing it more as a question, is
that one or two areas may be OK.
No,
“They should be coming to us,” Merz continued, noting that the
companies or organizations moving ahead with the wave energy parks
should be talking to existing users of the ocean: commercial fishermen,
recreational fishermen, commercial shippers.
Commercial Dungeness crabbers could see the most change in their fishing
patterns. The placement of the buoy arrays matches prime crab ground:
depths of between 20 and 40 fathoms on expanses of sandy ocean bottom.
Salmon
trollers also traverse the areas while seeking Chinook and beach
trawlers find sources of some flatfish.
Salmon and crab fisherman Tim Smith, who fishes the Irish Miss out of
“They're claim jumping,” Smith said. “They're taking that (area)
away.”
Projects already under way
Wave energy companies most often go through a two-step process to get
approval from FERC (see sidebar), but not always. They can skip applying
for a preliminary permit and simply apply for a license - as Finavera
Renewables did when it applied for a project in
FERC already has approved three preliminary permits, giving three
entities approval to test sites for the feasibility of operating more
than one or two buoys at a site (see sidebar). Only one license is
pending approval.
Ocean Power Technologies, with
Some of the companies applying for permits to operate wave energy parks
in the
Fishermen weren't happy about the overseas component of wave energy. If
the companies get subsidized to build here, where do the profits go,
several asked - do they stay in the
Furthermore, they said, the issue of fishing grounds is the main issue,
and the state and federal involvement in accepting energy parks that
could displace the fleet.
For instance, “crabbers,” Smith said. “(They're) going to push us
aside for foreign money?”
“I don't think the wave-generation buoys would generate as much
(money) as crab fishing,” Bogardus said.
Most fishermen agreed that somehow, some way, they should be compensated
for the loss of fishing grounds and that indeed, the fleet needs to be
an integral part of the process.
Already, crabbers in the Reedsport and
Husing proposed establishing a statewide committee with representatives
from the fishing fleet in each port to stay up-to-date on wave energy
developments.
It also needs to be pro-active, he said, by obtaining legal advice,
finding experts on FERC processes, doing socioeconomic studies, working
with the state's Congressional delegation and working with other state
and federal agencies.
“As a group, as an industry, we need to assert ourselves that there
already is a use here,” Merz agreed.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those
who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go
to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Source: http://www.theworldlink.com/articles/2007/04/10/breaking/tpn01041007.txt