Coos Bay
June 4, 2005
CHARLESTON - Even though the first half of the South
Coast commercial salmon season has ended for the summer, the political and legal
wrangling is just beginning.
On Friday, the Charleston-based Oregon Trollers Association and other salmon
fishermen and organizations, through the Pacific Legal Foundation and Oregonians
in Action, filed a lawsuit against the National Marine Fisheries Service in U.S.
District Court in Eugene.
It's salmon redux: This time
the case is about Chinook instead of coho, fish on the Klamath River in
California instead of the Alsea River in Oregon. But the central argument is the
same: The federal government didn't count hatchery fish along with naturally
spawning fish when it set 2005 salmon seasons.
"While the ocean is teeming with salmon, the government is telling these
people they can't fish," Russ Brooks, PLF attorney, said Friday.
Trollers association president Rayburn "Punch" Guerin said he sees the
fish when he's on the ocean and said he knows there are more Chinook, just out
of reach.
"We've just had a bellyful of this stuff," Guerin said Thursday aboard
his boat, the F/V Frankie, in Charleston. "The federal entities managing
that system think they're above the law."
It's a complex situation, with overlapping issues much like the scales on a
Chinook.
"I don't know what can be done about it," Don Stevens, chairman of the
salmon advisory panel for the Pacific Fishery Management Council, said Friday.
"We need more water and I don't know if we can get it from the Klamath
farmers or not. (The water) has been over-allocated for many, many years."
Guerin peeks out from below the brim of his Oregon Trollers Association cap and
looks around at the other trollers in the boat basin. He can recite from memory
most of the history surrounding salmon issues on the South Coast. He's fished,
he's argued; now he's just plain frustrated.
"There are so many areas where the government is trying to micromanage our
lives. People can't work," Guerin said Thursday.
Fishery managers closed much of the salmon season this year to southern Oregon
and northern California fishermen to allow more fish to return to the Klamath
River to spawn. The problem, managers said, is that there may be too few fish
returning to ensure Chinook repopulation on the Klamath River system.
But, the trollers argue, the managers don't count the hatchery fish, those that
are spawned and raised in captivity before being released to the wild to grow.
They consider only the natural spawning fish, the trollers and the attorneys
say.
While most rivers in Washington, Oregon and California are experiencing
adequate, if not strong, returns of fish, the Klamath is a weak spot on the
coast. Good ocean conditions are helping most salmon populations, but the
in-river situation on the Klamath cannot be overcome strictly by a productive
ocean, critics argue.
Even if the trollers win the lawsuit, Stevens said, it's unlikely things will
change for this year or maybe even next year. Any change to ocean salmon
management has to be done through the process of passing an amendment to the
fishery plan.
However, other things could have been done, Guerin said, to prevent the fish
kills a few years ago that are causing the current restrictions.
Many of the Chinook suffered from parasites in some sections of the Klamath and
Trinity rivers in recent years and those fish could have been trucked downriver
to colder water, Guerin said. The managers don't consider the stray factor,
either, he said, noting that some fish from other rivers will return to the
Klamath instead of their own. Mother Nature will ensure enough fish return to
the Klamath system to allow the salmon population to survive, he said.
But can managers depend on that? Does the introduction of human changes to the
river system play any part in the complex association between fish and habitat?
That's the root of the problem, said Glen Spain, northwest regional director of
the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations.
The Klamath River system water is grossly overappropriated, to farmers, to
fishermen, to refuges, and more. Water diverted from the river and its
tributaries often results in low water levels and warmer water that stresses the
fish.
Only more water in the river can change the situation of dying fish in the
spring and fall, Spain said Friday.
"If PLF really wants to help fishermen, they should help us fight for more
water so more fish survive in the Klamath, not oppose that as they have in other
cases," Spain said. "They're doing fishermen no good in the long run
if they oppose putting enough water in the river."
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Source: http://www.theworldlink.com/articles/2005/06/04/news/news01.txt