By Tom DeWeese
May 1, 2005
Which do you choose? A way of
life in which you are the master of your destiny, or one in which virtually
all decisions are made for you, by one ruling body or another? It's the
classic struggle facing every human on earth. Freedom, or control.
Truth be known, there are many who actually choose control. It makes for a
well-ordered society, with few surprises. In a controlled society, one doesn't
have to make complicated career choices, and health care is provided.
Community planners decide where housing will be placed. Committees decide what
industries are to be allowed, and how they will operate.
Watchdogs decide the foods that we shall be permitted to eat - to protect
our health, of course. Family planners decide the number of children allowed.
Those children will be well taken care of every day - in public education
centers, that not only provide a centrally planned curriculum, but also
provide for all physical and mental health needs.
In a controlled society there is no reason for crime, because there are no
real possessions to steal, and no personally owned weapons to threaten bodily
harm. The aged have no fears for the future, as they are taken care of with
government-controlled social security accounts. Economic security is promised
for a better world, as everyone sacrifices equally to help their fellow man.
Everything is well organized, peaceful, and controlled. Everyone is secure in
the knowledge that tomorrow will be just like today.
On the other hand, there is the chaos of what some foolishly call freedom.
In such a society, people are fully responsible for their own actions.
Untethered individuals throw a monkey wrench into a well-ordered society,
by inventing new gadgets that make life easier and more productive, but
threaten old ways. Selfish people pursue their own dreams and ideals, without
ever worrying about how they fit into the order of society. They want to
benefit from the fruits of their labor, own property, and raise families,
without controls established from the wisdom of the community.
Imagine such a society - in which parents get to decide how best to educate
their children. And think of the irresponsibility of individuals actually
being able to choose if, and how, they want to invest their money to prepare
for retirement. In the so-called free society, people eat what they want,
without benefit of government approval. Children are part of the family that
bore them, not overseen by the state. People start enterprises without asking
permission. Nothing stays the same, except that individuals are secure in
their homes, and have the ability to live their lives as they choose.
Control today has a name. Agenda 21. This is the name of a policy
document that was first unveiled at the United Nations' Earth Summit in 1992.
Implementation is through a policy called Sustainable Development. This
program is now the official policy of the United States, and is being
systematically imposed in every single state of the Union, and in every city
and town. There are very few exceptions.
Sustainable Development is no less than a ruling principle by which
decisions for all aspects of our lives are determined through public/private
partnerships between government (at all levels) and private institutions in
our communities. They provide guidelines to determine business decisions;
property use; medical care; education curriculum; foreign policy; economics;
taxes; labor policy; career decisions; housing; building material; farming
policy; and much more. Agenda 21 is based on the principle that
government grants our rights.
If you choose freedom, then there is a counter to Agenda 21 and its
Sustainable Development program. It's called Freedom 21, and it's quickly
growing into a "freedom movement."
Freedom 21 is not an organization. It is a loose coalition of groups and
individuals who believe that our nation's Founding Fathers had it right when
they established this nation as one with tightly controlled reins on
government. The Founding Fathers believed that all individuals were born with
their rights of individual liberty, and that government's job is to protect
those rights, as individuals pursue their own dreams and goals. That's the
basis for the Freedom 21 agenda.
Freedom 21 was organized six years ago by Henry Lamb (Environmental
Conservation Organization), Tom DeWeese (American Policy Center), Craig Rucker
and David Rothbard (Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow), and
representatives of Eagle Forum. Today, this group is joined by the
Chicago-based Heartland Institute and Chuck Cushman's American Land Rights
Association.
The unique fact about Freedom 21 is that it is truly a grassroots
coalition. It has no central infrastructure; no official leader; no budget; no
overhead, and no bureaucracy. The co-sponsors are independent organizations,
which do not give up their individual identity or autonomy to participate in
Freedom 21 activities. It succeeds precisely because members are open to the
activities of others, and are happy to lend their support. The coalition
operates under a set of principles of freedom-first, adopted by activists in a
conference held in July of 2000.
In its six years, Freedom 21 has served as a mechanism for reaching out to
the freedom movement to share ideas and unite grassroots activists. Through
Freedom 21 projects and conferences, the movement has been able to introduce
leaders in other movements to the principles of freedom. Even more, one-issue
activists are beginning to learn that they share common goals and adversaries
with other grassroots movements.
Freedom 21 has been instrumental in uniting Second Amendment defenders;
property rights activists; free market advocates; tax opponents; personal
privacy protectors; family autonomy champions; back-to-basics education
activists, and many more. These single-issue activists have come to understand
that they all share a common foe in Sustainable Development.
Today, Freedom 21 is providing invaluable tools to help fight back against
the threat of the U.N.'s Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development. In the
past year, Freedom 21 leaders have developed a six-hour DVD presentation
entitled, Americas' Choice: Liberty or Sustainable Development,
designed to help educate activists and elected officials. Also produced is a
booklet for elected officials entitled, Understanding Sustainable
Development: A Guide for Public Officials.
In 2005, Freedom 21 has turned its efforts toward creating new sources of
funding for the cash-starved freedom movement. Just announced was freedom21.com,
a unique Internet service provider that gives $2 of every member's monthly
subscription fee to the freedom organization of the member's choice. Soon, two
more unique funding sources will be announced under the Freedom21 banner.
The most important project, each year, is the Freedom 21 National
Conference; this year scheduled for July 14 to 16 in Reno, Nevada. This year's
conference is designed like building blocks to show how Sustainable
Development policies erode the principles of freedom in every area of life.
Participants will learn about sustainable polices on water, medicine, and
education. They will learn how to use alternative media, like the Internet and
television, to help fight for the principles of liberty. Participants will
hear from local activists about how to fight on the home front, and they will
learn of the ravages of Sustainable Development on the international front.
The conference educates, unites, inspires, and renews the spirit. Go to http://www.freedom21.org/
for all the details. Freedom 21 is the gathering place for the freedom
movement.
Collectivism, and its false promise of security, may be the accepted policy
of the day, but the freedom movement is learning how to fight back.
Tom DeWeese is the president of the American
Policy Center and publisher/editor of "The DeWeese Report," a
monthly public affairs newsletter.Agenda 21 or Freedom 21:
Making the right choice
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who
have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml