Oct. 29, 2008
-- Young salmon in the
Columbia River
appear to be unaffected by dams,
according to new research.
The heavily dammed
Columbia and its largest tributary the
Snake River in the northwestern United
States serve as a breeding ground to
millions of
salmon,
including endangered chinook and
steelhead species, which have been
dwindling steadily for years.
Whether or not the
eight dams along the rivers contribute
to the decline has been a source of
bitter controversy for decades.
Conservation groups, the commercial and
sport fishing industries and local
Native American tribes have long blamed
the fishes' plight on the dams.
Government agencies have responded by
sinking some $600 million into the
watershed for research, and building
structures like fish ladders that reduce
the
dams' impact
on fish.
Now a new study
published yesterday in the journal
PloS Biology suggests the measures
are working.
David Welch of Kintama
Research in Canada, a company that
develops equipment for tracking marine
life, and colleagues tagged 1,000 young
chinook and steelhead salmon in the
Columbia-Snake rivers and the undammed
Fraser River in British Columbia. They
tracked the fish as they navigated out
to sea through the rivers, and then
compared survival rates in the two
rivers.
Related Content:
How Stuff Works:
Salmon
Let It Crumble: When
No Infrastructure Is Best
Discovery News Blog:
Born Animal
In the Columbia they
found the fish survived just as well, if
not better than fish swimming down the
Fraser River even though they have to
swim 600 kilometers (373 miles) further.
To account for the difference the
researchers measured fish survival per
100 kilometers (62 miles) of swimming.
By that metric 80
percent of young fish survived per 100
kilometers, versus 60 (37 miles) in the
Fraser.
"I was bowled over,"
Welch said. "Everybody including me
thought we'd see much lower survival in
the Columbia."
However, Welch said
the results don't mean dams are good for
fish. They may have a long-term impact
on survival that the researchers didn't
see.
"Their survival rate
in the ocean is about one-half of one
percent," he said. "So there's still a
problem, but it's mainly because of
whatever is happening to them in the
ocean."
This year, salmon
populations along the west coast of the
United States plummeted, prompting the
federal government to close fisheries in
California and much of Oregon. Congress
approved $170 million in emergency
funding to blunt the damage caused to
commercial and sport fishing industries
in the region.
Ray Hilborn of the
Unviersity of Washington ascribes much
of the decline in salmon population to
natural climate cycles like
El Nino
and
La Nina,
which can affect ocean temperatures
throughout Pacific northwest.
"Changes in water
temperature can affect the distribution
of predators," like the salmon shark, a
close relative of the great white shark
seals, and sea lions, Hilborn said.
"Right now most of
what we're seeing is probably not due to
anthropogenic climate change," he said.
"In a 100 years that could be a very
different story."
Related Links:
Kintama Research
Upper Colorado River
Endangered Fish Recovery Program