|
|
|
|
|
Much of the farmland and ranches of |
Much of
our most scenic, privately held land in the
Bob Burns, Pendleton, Ore.-based farmland appraiser, said the trend of
outside investors buying farmland and forestland started in the
n A longtime locally owned ranch just north of Pendleton recently sold
to a
n Pendleton lawyer Steve Corey said he's seen a rising number of outside
investors buying mountain land in this region. Corey said one investor,
from
n Andy Vanderplatt, of Farm Credit Services, Pendleton, said a couple of
ranches south of Pilot Rock have been sold to non-farmer buyers. He said
non-ag buyers from
n Appraiser Bob Burns said an investor from
n Burns said that after a Grant County, Ore., timberland owner said he
was open to selling, a fellow came to the owner to say that a party from
n Pendleton realtor Kal Garton said he continually gets calls from
n Jim Whitney, Pendleton realtor, said recently he was working on sale
of a 7,000-plus-acre ranch on the
n Carter Kerns, a member of the Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission,
said an outside investor bought a ranch near La Grande just for elk
hunting.
n Investors from
n Mike Nelson,
Some ranchers have been willing to keep their land on the market for
three to five years until a buyer arrives on the scene.
Casey Applen, who runs the nationwide Farmseller service for Capital
Press, said folks in the Northwest real estate field believe that
Buyers wanting land in
Those wanting land in northeast
It seems to me that this trend of outside investors buying farm- and
forestlands brings problems.
One is that it drives up land prices on that acreage, which is important
to the economies of rural communities. Once a guy with deep pockets
comes to buy his country get-away, it becomes a lot harder for local
farmers and woodland owners to add to their acreages. Pendleton
appraiser Burns fears that the lure of riches will entice some farmers
and ranchers to sell.
Those ag producers spend money in a community and take part in the life
of a town.
Another drawback is that public access overall to rural lands seems to
be harder to come by after outside investors have taken over. Carter
Kerns, of the Oregon Fish and Game Commission, said outside landowners
seldom work with game biologists on numbers, or movement of deer or elk,
the way most ranchers act as partners with the state agency.
I believe that land being farmed is important for a few reasons. Farm
employment helps rural economies. Experienced landowners manage the soil
so as to lessen erosion. Farmland provides open space, which helps make
the Northwest one of the most livable regions.
In some cases, outside investors continue ag activity on the land and
sometimes they don't. Problems come up when a person unfamiliar with
farm or forest land moves in to take over. A veteran
I can understand why a cattle rancher in northeast
Bob Burns worries especially about what's happening with outside
investors buying timberland. He told of Boise Cascade selling land to an
investment group, which sold it to another investment group. Kind of
like the mortgage loans that were bundled up and sold, resold, resold,
etc.
"They're not in it for the long term," Burns said of the
investment groups.
One realtor told me a teachers' pension fund from the East Coast was one
of the outside investors who had bought land in this area.
John Bliss, a member of the
Bliss said his study is just getting off the ground, but he blames a few
factors for the sell-off of timber to institutional investors - it's
cheaper to produce timber in some other countries, federal tax policies
encourage divesting, and many shareholders view timberland as a poor
investment.
What is happening to these timber properties in the hands of
institutional investors? Bliss said three alternatives have turned up in
his study: a) intensely managed forest growth and harvest; b) some lands
spun off for "higher and better uses" such as vacation homes;
and c) conservation groups end up buying or leasing easements on some
forested lands.
Bliss points out that alternative A reflects in part a provision in the
federal tax code that says investors need some return on their
investments within 15 years. On alternative B, the researcher said
The Nature Conservancy is the most prominent conservation group under
alternative C. Nature Conservancy made the news in
Bliss said a firm named Forest Capital, based in
A Forest Capital official said his firm's goal is to grow timber for
long-term sustainability and long-term certification. The company also
has a division called West Slope Properties, which sells to developers
timberland that does not qualify for the firm's goal of long-term,
sustainable timber.
Less than 1 percent of Forest Capital's 2.1 million acres is under West
Slope Properties, an official said. A spokesman said prices on company
forestland have risen sharply the past 12 to 15 months from $500-$800 an
acre to $1,000-$1,800 an acre.
The firehose flow of capital, and the fast rise in prices, have struck
me in talking to people for this article. John Bliss says it's tough for
him and his researchers to keep up when timberland transactions are
occurring at such speed.
A few programs on the West Coast are trying to address this trend of
forestland or farmland ending up in the hands of institutional
investors.
A couple of years ago, the Oregon Legislature passed the Community
Forest Act which allows nongovernmental entities to issue revenue bonds
to play financial roles in forestland transactions. Such an entity - the
Deschutes Basin Land Trust - has been negotiating with Fidelity National
Title Insurance Company over thousands of acres of forestland owned by
Fidelity in
Fidelity is considering development of a resort on the forestland.
Leaders of the Land Trust would like Fidelity to sell to the Land Trust
33,000 acres near
To gain more information on that situation, call the Deschutes Basin
Land Trust in
In
Finally, it might be worth mentioning a 9-year-old
Mike Forrester is former publisher and editor of Capital Press. He
lives in
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those
who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go
to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Source: http://www.capitalpress.info/main.asp?Search=1&ArticleID=39970&
SectionID=67&SubSectionID=782&S=1