The following editorial was written and submitted by Family Farm Alliance Advisory Committee member Norm Semanko, executive director of the Idaho Water Users Association.  

A Victory For Verl  

By Norm Semanko

Executive Director, Idaho Water Users Association  

            Verl Jones has got to be smiling to himself about now.  It's just sad he can only be here in spirit to celebrate a true moment of jurisprudence sanity returning to our state.  

            Verl, a lifelong Challis resident, and his family own a small ranch. Since 1961 they had used a legal Idaho water right to divert water from a small creek to irrigate alfalfa fields were they grew hay to feed their livestock.  

            In December 2000 the activist Idaho Watersheds Project crew, headed by Jon Marvel, sued the Jones family claiming - without a single shred of evidence - they were violating the ESA because diverting water was killing bull trout.  Let me restate that again for emphasis:  claiming - without a single shred of evidence - that bull trout were being killed.  

            The Jones family, plus a longtime ranch hand, testified that there had never been a bull trout killed or even injured in the 40 years they had been diverting water.  They rightfully concluded that the real motive behind the case was to financially drive them off their land.  

            Incredibly, a Federal judge ignored their first hand rebuttal testimony and issued an injunction ordering the ranching family to stop diverting water.  For the past three years the Jones family has been forced to buy about 100 tons of hay every year to make up for the loss while they appealed the obviously logic-challenged judicial ruling.  

            On April 25 the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the District Court's decision ruling environmental activists cannot use the Endangered Species Act (ESA) as a weapon unless they can first actually prove something is harming a species.  The Ninth Circuit judges rightfully decided that courts cannot simply accept at face value claims by environmental extremists that harm to a species is being done.  The Court sent the case back for trial so that evidence, or lack of evidence, can be evaluated.  

            The ruling finally sets a critically important bar to be cleared when enviros try to use the ESA as an unrestricted hammer against Idahoans: they must prove harm is being done before an injunction can be issued.  The ruling also notes that if there is no evidence a species has been harmed in the past then it probably means it won't be harmed by the same situation in the future.  

            Verl Jones died in November 2003 so he never got the chance to see his common sense vindicated.  But the victory over out of control environmental extremists is a true legacy of which his family and Idahoans everywhere can be proud.