Weekly Views From The Secretary
August 18, 2006
If you have not heard of it, you will. The
mass media is blaming "agriculture" for a predicted increase in the
size of the so-called "dead zone" in the Gulf of Mexico.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) scientist Dave
Whitehall recently issued a press release predicting that the anaerobic
(oxygen depleted) area in the Gulf of Mexico known as "the dead
zone" will grow by 40 percent this year due primarily to agricultural
nutrient runoff into the Mississippi River.
Congress has spent hundreds of millions of dollars on the theory that
agricultural practices are primarily responsible for the dead zone. Congress
apparently does not know that "agricultural nonpoint source" means
everything except point sources, big city runoff and natural sources.
NOAA shut down testing the dead zone shortly after hurricane Katrina. The
fishing in that zone boomed to abundance after the hurricane, indicating the
anaerobic conditions lifted even though millions of tons of waste washed into
the area from cities along the coast.
NOAA and EPA continue to blame "agriculture" and its use of
fertilizer as the primary cause of the dead zone, but never point out that the
lawns, football fields, baseball fields, soccer fields and golf courses of
every town smaller than 50,000 people are deemed an "agricultural
non-point source" of water pollution and fertilizer use for which
"farmers" take the blame.
Why is that? Maybe it is because farmers are only a tiny percentage of the
population and an easy political target, while sports fans, small towns and
homeowners are not.
Here is a recent example of the results of the overbroad definition of
agricultural sources: Subsidies wreak havoc on the ecosystem. One small
example: There's a 6,000-square-mile dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico, larger
than Connecticut. It's so depleted of oxygen because of algae blooms caused by
fertilizer runoff that shrimp and crabs at the Louisiana shore literally try
to leap from the water to breathe. This is endangering the profitable Gulf
fishing industry. Most of the fertilizer comes from a few Midwestern counties
that receive billions in subsidies (more than $30 billion from 1997 to 2002,
according to the Environmental Working Group), so says columnist Jonah
Goldberg in the Los Angles Times newspaper on August 3, 2006, in an article
entitle "Welfare Queens on Tractors".
This is portrayed as a national effort to save commercial fishing in the Gulf.
A public radio story said, Agricultural runoff in the Mississippi River
that flows into the Gulf of Mexico is suffocating sea life and threatening a
once-thriving Louisiana industry…Spring runoff from the Mississippi is
loaded with nitrogen-based fertilizers from farms. The fertilizer has the same
effect in the Gulf as it does on the Midwest fields it came from. But instead
of giving corn a growth spurt, the nitrogen fuels massive algae blooms that
then die and suck all of the oxygen out of the water as they decompose.
How many millions of acres of heavily fertilized and irrigated lawn-type grass
are in the "agricultural nonpoint source" in North America?
Maybe the real "dead zone" threat is simply an area where truth is
not welcome.

Source: http://www.state.sd.us/doa/secretary/news/Column_172.htm