Adjudication and the Klamath water
agreement
By TY BEAVER
H&N Staff Writer
More than 700
claims of water rights were filed, followed
by more than 5,500 contests to those claims.
About 200 of those contests have yet to be
settled. Impact on the Endangered Species
Act and involved federal agencies
also require consideration.
“We have issues today that weren’t
around in earlier adjudications,” said Tom
Paul, deputy director of Oregon Water
Resources Department.
In the background is the Klamath
Basin Restoration Agreement. The document is
in a holding pattern as PacifiCorp works
with state and federal officials on the
future of its Klamath River dams.
Released in January, the
restoration agreement advocates for dam
removal and also seeks to restore migratory
fisheries and wildlife habitat, provide land
to the Klamath Tribes and provide stable
water and energy rates to irrigators.
Federal and state lawmakers would be asked
for close to $1 billion to finance the
agreement.
Water users and other rights
holders can’t wait for the restoration
agreement to move forward,
though. They have to continue the state’s
adjudication process, with some seeking
further settlement of issues to others
pursuing litigation against opponents.
Exchange of information
Attorney Bill Ganong, who
represents Klamath Irrigation District, and
Bud Ullman, attorney for the Tribes, said
claimants are exchanging information before
depositions and testimony begins this fall.
Further written
testimony will be submitted beginning in the
spring.
The Tribes are
pursuing water rights on their former
reservation in northern Klamath County as
well as rights on Upper Klamath Lake and the
Klamath River. Klamath Irrigation District,
along with other irrigation and improvement
districts, seeks a claim to water in the
lake that feeds into the Klamath Reclamation
Project.