Adjudication without
settlement potentially devastating for agriculture
By BECKY HYDE
Guest
commentary
Klamath
Falls Herald and News
March 30,
2010
I appreciate former
state Sen. Steve Harper’s recent work on securing a veterans
home for Klamath Falls, and wholeheartedly support that
effort.
However, I was concerned
about statements that he made regarding the Klamath Basin’s
ongoing adjudication.
Harper helped facilitate
an effort about five years ago to try to solve some of the
complex issues around water, as it related to the Klamath
Tribes, the Project irrigators and the off-Project. That
effort did not bear fruit. He joins many of us in failed
past efforts to solve this problem.
It was not just the
Bureau of Indian Affairs that had trouble with Harper’s
agreement. It was also the Klamath Tribes General Council
and the Project irrigators.
Harper need not worry
about the state adjudication process. It is clearly marching
on.
Just “get it
adjudicated” without a settlement, is a potentially
devastating outcome for this agricultural community above
the lake and Harper needs to understand that.
Nobody in the
off-Project will rest easy until there is a complete water
settlement with the Klamath Tribes.
Let’s be clear — the
adjudication is moving forward and there is a reasoned
process to “settle” these issues happening at the same time.
For him to say that the
Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement does not help “upper
county agriculturists” makes
me question his basic
understanding of the agreement.
Where is his plan for
affordable power for my neighbors pumping from deep wells?
Where is his plan for
protection for my community from endangered species — the
very fish that have ranch and farm families in the Klamath
Project wondering how they are going to survive to the end
of summer — again?
Where is his plan for my
good neighbor down the road with a 1978 water right hurtling
toward a “get adjudicated” future?
Harper’s a smart man,
and the KBRA is far from perfect, but a lot has happened in
the last five years.
I would welcome a public
debate on this issue — anytime, anywhere, between the folks
Harper listens to and the folks shaping a future for
ranching and farming in the off-Project.