Become a friend of

   the Klamath Bucket  

            Brigade

   Send Donations Here

     All donations are tax  

             deductible

 

 

 This Website is Dedicated to

 Alvin Alexander Cheyne

January 10, 1921 - June 17, 2005

 

GovTrack.us is an independent tool to help the public research and track the activities in the U.S. Congress, promoting government transparency and civic education through novel uses of technology.

 

 

 

 

      

 

Ag economy favored most Basin farmers this season 

 

Prices good for beef, hay, grain, potatoes 

 

By SARA HOTTMAN 

H&N Staff Reporter

December 19, 2010

 

   Jason Chapman raises cattle suitable for filet mignon.

 

   For the past two years, they’ve gone to hamburger.

 

   A persistently bad economy has drawn consumers away from the cut of meat that sometimes tops three figures to hamburger that can be worth cents per pound.

 

   “It decreases the value of the animal when we’re selling lots of hamburger,” said Chapman, president of the Klamath County chapter of the Oregon Cattlemen’s Association.

 

   But fewer head of cattle nationwide this year meant area ranchers could still get a solid price-per-pound for their animals — a good thing since many farmers had to pay more to fatten next year’s livestock with grain since grass was in short supply after a bad growing season.  

 

   For grain farmers, cattlemen’s extra expense is good news for their balance sheets.

 

   Livestock, hay and grain farmers are in different sectors of agriculture that, with other agricultural and commercial sectors, overlap like a Venn diagram. Their successes and failures impact their circle, but also have a far-reaching ripple effect.

 

   That ripple favored most Basin farmers this year. Though expenses were up and production was down because of a water shortage, lower production worldwide meant local farmers received higher prices for their products.

 

   “We have a perfect market,” said Willie Riggs, agricultural economist and director of the OSU Klamath Basin Research and Extension Center. “We force competition in the open market … and that drives prices up and down.”

 

   Adjusting to the market

 

   Successful Basin farmers and ranchers constantly tweak their business as the endless variables that affect the market come into play during the growing season, Riggs said.

 

   “It all evens out (among sectors) over time,” Riggs said. “Not everything switches at once because everyone manages risk differently.”

 

   Chapman minimizes his risk by retaining ownership of his cattle from birth to death. He sells most of his beef to Country Natural Beef, an antibiotic- and hormone-free brand.

 

   “We know the animals are high quality and can go direct to the customer,” Chapman said. “It gives us more stability in the market.  

 

   “We don’t see the highest of highs, but we also don’t see the lowest of lows.”

 

   For grains, grass and row crops, the risk is higher since the product’s success is directly tied to unknowns like weather and, in the West, water.

 

   Steve Kandra, a local farmer, decided not to plant wheat this season because of water restrictions. Instead, he leased his fields to row crop farmers.

 

   So when rampant fires and unusual weather destroyed wheat crops in Russia, one of the leading wheat producers, Kandra cringed. Wheat price-per-bushel skyrocketed, but because of his rational decision five months prior, he missed out on the boom.  

 

   But overall higher price per bushel, hundred weight and pound for farmers this year affects another circle in the agricultural Venn diagram: consumers, who pay more for food.

 

   In essence, Riggs, said, “the price of corn takes a dive, the price of pig bellies goes up.

 

   “It’s all tied together.”

 

Side Bar

 
JASON CHAPMAN, Klamath Basin cattle rancher
 
 
Drought’s impact will hit ranchers in spring
 
By ELON GLUCKLICH 
H&N Staff Reporter
December 19, 2010
 
   As a cattle rancher, Jason Chapman can’t help but spend summers with his mind on the following spring, when livestock is sold and profits are made.
 
   The 600 cattle and calves that grazed on his property this year won’t be sold until this coming spring. Until then, he won’t have a clear picture of how tough the 2010 drought was to manage.
 
   “The impact for us isn’t really seen in the year of a drought. It’s normally the year afterwards that we know what impact it’s had,” Chapman said.
 
   When water is scarce, maintaining weight of 600 head of cattle becomes a trying task. It’s one Chapman and other cattle ranchers have had to deal with since a drought was declared in March.
 
   When irrigation ditches went dry in 2001, the average weight of Chapman’s cattle dropped. He fears the same situation could be unfolding this year.
 
   But 2010 was no 2001, he said, when canals went all year without irrigation water and his cattle had to walk a quarter-mile for a drink.
 
   A booming market could help him offset any loss in cattle weight that may come.
 
   “The one bright spot is the cattle market has really come up, so we’re hopeful that the market will stick around and we can capitalize,” he said.
 
   But the uncertainty of water will continue to weigh on his mind. And until he gets an adjudication claim, or the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement is implemented, Chapman said, there is little more he can do than wait and see what next year has in store.
 
   “I think we all learned our lesson back in 2001. There’s not a whole lot more we could have done in 2010 that was different than what we had done then,” he said, before adding with a hint of wishful thinking: “Hopefully it will never happen again.” 
 
 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material  herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have
expressed  a  prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and  educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml