






|
Become a friend of
the Klamath Bucket
Brigade
Send
Donations Here
All donations are tax
deductible
|
|
This Website is Dedicated to
Alvin Alexander Cheyne
January
10, 1921 - June 17, 2005
|

GovTrack.us is an independent tool to help the public
research and track the activities in the U.S. Congress, promoting
government transparency and civic education through novel uses of
technology.
|
|

Ag economy
favored most Basin farmers this season
Prices good for beef, hay, grain,
potatoes
Jason
Chapman raises cattle suitable for filet mignon.
For the past two
years, they’ve gone to hamburger.
A persistently bad
economy has drawn consumers away from the cut of meat
that sometimes tops three figures to hamburger that can
be worth cents per pound.
“It decreases the
value of the animal when we’re selling lots of
hamburger,” said Chapman, president of the Klamath
County chapter of the Oregon Cattlemen’s Association.
But fewer head of
cattle nationwide this year meant area ranchers could
still get a solid price-per-pound for their animals — a
good thing since many farmers had to pay more to fatten
next year’s livestock with grain since grass was in
short supply after a bad growing season.
For grain farmers,
cattlemen’s extra expense is good news for their balance
sheets.
Livestock, hay and
grain farmers are in different sectors of agriculture
that, with other agricultural and commercial sectors,
overlap like a Venn diagram. Their successes and
failures impact their circle, but also have a
far-reaching ripple effect.
That ripple favored
most Basin farmers this year. Though expenses were up
and production was down because of a water shortage,
lower production worldwide meant local farmers received
higher prices for their products.
“We have a perfect
market,” said Willie Riggs, agricultural economist and
director of the OSU Klamath Basin Research and Extension
Center. “We force competition in the open market … and
that drives prices up and down.”
Successful Basin
farmers and ranchers constantly tweak their
business as the
endless variables that affect the market come into play
during the growing season, Riggs said.
“It all evens out
(among sectors) over time,” Riggs said. “Not everything
switches at once because everyone manages risk
differently.”
Chapman minimizes
his risk by retaining ownership of his cattle from birth
to death. He sells most of his beef to Country Natural
Beef, an antibiotic- and hormone-free brand.
“We know the animals
are high quality and can go direct to the customer,”
Chapman said. “It gives us more stability in the market.
“We don’t see the
highest of highs, but we also don’t see the lowest of
lows.”
For grains, grass
and row crops, the risk is higher since the product’s
success is directly tied to unknowns like weather and,
in the West, water.
Steve Kandra, a
local farmer, decided not to plant wheat this season
because of water restrictions. Instead, he leased his
fields to row crop farmers.
So when rampant
fires and unusual weather destroyed wheat crops in
Russia, one of the leading wheat producers, Kandra
cringed. Wheat price-per-bushel skyrocketed, but because
of his rational decision five months prior, he missed
out on the boom.
But overall higher
price per bushel, hundred weight and pound for farmers
this year affects another circle in the agricultural
Venn diagram: consumers, who pay more for food.
In essence, Riggs,
said, “the price of corn takes a dive, the price of pig
bellies goes up.
“It’s all tied together.”
 |
|
JASON CHAPMAN, Klamath Basin
cattle rancher
|
Drought’s impact will
hit ranchers in spring
By ELON GLUCKLICH
H&N Staff Reporter
December 19, 2010
As a cattle rancher, Jason
Chapman can’t help but spend summers with
his mind on the following spring, when
livestock is sold and profits are made.
The 600 cattle and calves
that grazed on his property this year won’t
be sold until this coming spring. Until
then, he won’t have a clear picture of how
tough the 2010 drought was to manage.
“The impact for us isn’t
really seen in the year of a drought. It’s
normally the year afterwards that we know
what impact it’s had,” Chapman said.
When water is scarce,
maintaining weight of 600 head of cattle
becomes a trying task. It’s one Chapman and
other cattle ranchers have had to deal with
since a drought was declared in March.
When irrigation ditches
went dry in 2001, the average weight of
Chapman’s cattle dropped. He fears the same
situation could be unfolding this year.
But 2010 was no 2001, he
said, when canals went all year without
irrigation water and his cattle had to walk
a quarter-mile for a drink.
A booming market could
help him offset any loss in cattle weight
that may come.
“The one bright spot is
the cattle market has really come up, so
we’re hopeful that the market will stick
around and we can capitalize,” he said.
But the uncertainty of
water will continue to weigh on his mind.
And until he gets an adjudication claim, or
the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement is
implemented, Chapman said, there is little
more he can do than wait and see what next
year has in store.
“I think we all learned
our lesson back in 2001. There’s not a whole
lot more we could have done in 2010 that was
different than what we had done then,” he
said, before adding with a hint of wishful
thinking: “Hopefully it will never happen
again.”
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any
copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to
those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information
for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more
information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
|