GovTrack.us is an independent tool to help the public research and track the activities in the U.S. Congress, promoting government transparency and civic education through novel uses of technology.
|
|
|
|
|
H&N photo by Lee Juillerat Ron Cole stands by a nearly waterless marsh that he says can be better managed if the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement is implemented. |
Every fall, Klamath Basin National Wildlife
Refuges staff members wonder when the call will
come.
Ron Cole, who oversees management of the six
refuges, including Lower Klamath, got the
message last week, giving him notice that water
for the Lower Klamath National Wildlife Refuge
is being turned off.
If the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement, a
complex plan designed to benefit Upper and Lower
Klamath Basin tribes, commercial and
recreational fishermen, irrigators and three
species of endangered fish, is eventually
approved, things will be different, Cole says.
The refuges are the last to receive water. Only
after the needs for endangered suckers and
salmon, tribal interests and irrigators are met
does water flow into the Lower Klamath refuge.
“We get water when it’s available, when it’s in
surplus of everybody else’s needs,” Cole says.
“If the water is there today, you take it today.
There’s no provision to save it for later.”
“Timing and quantity are the keys,” says complex
biologist Dave Mauser. “As important as the
ability to get that water is the ability to
access that water when we want to. It’s like a
farmer who needs water at a certain time for his
crops.”
Guarantees water
Mauser and Cole, who were involved in Klamath
Basin Restoration Agreement negotiations, say
the agreement guarantees water and the ability
to determine when and where it’s used. The
annual fall cutoffs mean no or limited water to
fields that could provide habitat for migrating
waterfowl.
“This is a real important time for us,” Cole
says of fall. “Our job is to set the table for
them (migrating waterfowl) so there’s plenty of
food.”
Cole estimates the refuge has received about
25,000-acre feet of water this year. Under the
KBRA, the refuge would receive nearly double
that amount, 48,000 acre-feet, in low water
years and upward of 60,000 acre-feet in wetter
years from April to October.
Part of the Project
If available, the refuge could receive another
35,000 acre-feet in the winter. Water from the
Klamath River is pumped onto the Lower Klamath
from canals near Highway 97 and Worden.
The KBRA also includes a provision that for the
first time in history makes the refuge part of
the Klamath Reclamation Project and puts it in
equal standing with agriculture.
“It’s important to be a part of the Project to
legally have access to that water,” Cole says.
Planning ahead
Mauser says that until last week’s shutoff, 70
to 80 percent of the water wanted for the Lower
Klamath had been provided. Depending on weather
patterns, there’s no way of knowing when water
will again be available.
If the KBRA is approved, he says refuge managers
can evaluate annual water forecasts and plan
when and where guaranteed allotments are used.
Under the current arrangement, water is provided
when the Bureau of Reclamation determines it’s
available. Cole compares the situation to
farmers receiving water in December, when fields
are dormant, and not in spring and summer when
crops are planted.
“You go to the faucet and there’s nothing there.
It’s hit or miss,” he said.
The search for solutions
Dave Mauser, a
biologist for the Klamath Basin National
Wildlife Refuges, has seen efforts to deal with
water issues come and go since moving to the
Klamath Basin in 1991.
“The previous years were a debate about science
— whose science was right,” he says.
In recent years, Mauser says there’s been a
shift, one that mixes science, or the needs for
endangered fish, with the needs of people living
in the Upper and Lower Klamath River Basin.
“Throwing our hands up and saying, ‘let’s go to
court,’ is not a solution. The time to solve the
problem is here,” he says.
Mauser says negotiations have been affected by
multiple factors, from changes in presidential
administrations and evolving science to
stakeholders being able to identify issues most
important to them.
A major turning point has been the relicensing
of the Klamath River dams.
He believes PacifiCorp, which owns the four
dams, made a business decision to remove the
structures because of the projected costs of
trying to meet various state and federal
mandates and court fees.
“Having a shot at dam removal was a key,” Mauser
says.
Ron Cole, who manages the refuge complex,
agrees.
“In their eyes,” he says of groups that have
criticized the plan, “it’s not perfect and so
it’s not worth doing.”
He defends the Endangered Species Act and the
involved National Environment Protection Act,
which are often seen as obstacles. In Cole’s
eyes, “They allow citizens the right to work for
solutions, not to stop achieving solutions.”
Side Bar
Long-range planning at the
refuges
The Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement isn’t the only issue facing the Klamath Basin National Wildlife Refuges. Beginning next month will be public scopings, or information gathering, for a long-range comprehensive conservation plan for five of the complex’s six refuges.
The complex
is wrapping up a management plan for the Klamath
Marsh National Wildlife Refuge. The pending plan
will include the Lower Klamath, Tule Lake, Clear
Lake, Bear Valley
Public meetings will be in Tulelake and Klamath Falls, and probably elsewhere. After obtaining public input, staff will write a draft plan, get public review, and develop a final plan.
The potential Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement, which would give the refuges status as a partner in the Klamath Irrigation Project and guarantee water supplies, will be included as an alternative in the plan.