GovTrack.us is an independent tool to help the public
research and track the activities in the U.S. Congress, promoting
government transparency and civic education through novel uses of
technology.
Agriculture in danger
if dams are removed
Klamath Falls Herald and News
Letter to the Editor
February 17, 2009
Regarding the Feb. 12 headline
under the H&N view: ’Tis the season to remember the reason
for water storage:”
What happens to Basin agriculture
during drought years if the lower dams are removed so all
in-stream flows in the Klamath River are from Upper Klamath
Lake? Does anyone really believe there will be water for
irrigation?
I also note in the CDM study for
the Bureau of Reclamation liabilities for dam removal run
from a low of $466 million to a high of $837 million. When
was the last time any project of this size did not exceed
the highest estimate?
The report also speculates
operation of Keno Dam would likely be turned over to the
Bureau and become the focus for water quality issues. Since
the water quality above Keno dam is notoriously low, I see
the same environmental groups wanting it removed.
It follows the locus for water quality issues will move to
Upper Klamath Lake after Keno Dam is removed. The historical
marshlands of the lake will need to be restored under the
guise of improving water quality there. Of course, Link
River dam will have to be removed for that to happen.
Regarding all these expensive studies, where is the original
cost/benefit ratio study for Iron Gate? What Oregon and
California need is more water storage, not less.
Steve Rapalyea
Chiloquin
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any
copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to
those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information
for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more
information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml