Most of it is based on the Kuchel Act of 1964, a federal law mandating
the refuge lands be managed for both waterfowl and farming. It also
set a base of 13,000 acres of permanent surface water.
Not long ago, I remember when refuge personnel were proposing that
the permanent lake known as Sump 1 be moved
to existing dry farmland, and the bottom of the flooded land be
dried up and farmed.
There were several reasons for doing this, not the least of which
was disease in waterfowl and agricultural lands.
While it seemed like a good idea, the reality was that it would be
totally cost prohibitive and, ultimately, the farmers would be out
of business for a long time.
Then, the idea was broached by Mike and others that perhaps they
could, or should, consider scaling back on their objective to
something a bit more manageable.
What we now have is a wonderful program by which everyone wins.
Not all the land is under refuge control, nor is it all under Bureau
of Reclamation control. Each entity has a different program with the
same basic plan.
Using a more moderate land base of 1,800 acres at a time, Mike
divides it up into three 600 acre parcels.
The land to be flooded is divided into
three 200-acre plots, separated by dikes. This allows the entire 600
acres to be flooded with less water due to the differences in
elevation.
Almost all work is performed by local personnel during what can best
be described as regular dike maintenance, so there is no additional
cost.
This land is kept flooded for one year in the three-year rotation
lands. Each year, a new parcel is flooded and the flooded land
drained and farmed, which kills both weeds and insects, like the
potato farmer’s nemesis, the nematode.
It is called it flood fallowing, but has since changed to referring
to it as walking wetlands.
In other parcels, officials leave the land flooded for two years,
setting up a six-year rotation. These parcels qualify the farmer to
sell crops with an organic designation, making it much more
valuable. The cost savings on pesticides and the trips across the
field to apply them are substantial.
It has also increased bidding by farmers, raising the income to the
Bureau.
The refuge parcels are flooded for four years at a time, making the
lands’ response, again, different from the other parcels.
Many thousands of acres called seasonal wetlands also are managed.
We have learned that land that is flooded during the winter, and
dried out slowly in the spring, produces and incredible amount of
food for waterfowl.
The list of plant species is long, but all of them produce seed,
seed that feeds the waterfowl and regenerates
itself the following year.
As we toured the refuge, the number of waterfowl using the fields
and flooded acres was incredible.
Mike said that an old timer he talked to said the number of birds is
almost like the good old days. The old man said there are more birds
now than he can remember.
That’s news that makes Mike proud.
We also talked about the folks who decry the farming on the refuge
and would stop all agriculture on refuge lands. One of the targets
is row crops like onions and potatoes.
According to Mike, onions require new land each year to avoid
disease, and farmers are running out of new places to grow them. By
flood fallowing the land for two years, the soil returns to its
virgin state and onions are back in business.
Potatoes are another field crop that needs expensive control of
nematodes for a saleable crop. Anyone who has lived in the Klamath
Basin very long should be familiar with the smell of fields being
fumigated.
Flood fallowing makes that process unnecessary.
There is another thing I learned about potato land — the snow
geese love it.
We watched as tens of thousands of the white birds got up from a
flooded field, one of Mike’s, and landed in a plowed potato field,
passing up grain stubble on the way.
Who says agriculture isn’t good for wildlife?
It doesn’t take long for a reasonably intelligent person to see
just how much more waterfowl can be fed on lands manipulated by man,
especially for them.
To stop all agriculture on our waterfowl refuges would be a wildlife
disaster of monumental proportions.
And, while we are manipulating land for the ducks and geese, other
wildlife prospers, as well. On our drive, we saw at least a half
dozen rooster pheasants, and as many coyotes, not to mention the
hawks and mule deer.
Song birds were everywhere, as were shore birds and fish-eating
fowl.
Habitat designed for one species, by its very nature, nurtures of a
host of disciplines, both cold blooded and warm.
It isn’t much of a reach to refer to it as the new Tulelake.
It is a new concept. We talked with some visitors from central
California and they moaned and complained about the refuges there,
where the wetlands are left to fend for themselves.
The results show in the amount of wildlife they support.
There are also some new rules for hunters and birdwatchers, not the
least of which is the seasonal pass. No more day-passes. And, for
hunters, the key word is adaptive management.
Things change from year to year, so check the rules and zones before
venturing out before the crack of dawn.
Jack Elbert writes about hunting and fishing for the Herald and News.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any
copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to
those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information
for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information
go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Source:
http://pioneer.olivesoftware.com/Daily/Skins/heraldandnews/
navigator.asp?skin=heraldandnews