GovTrack.us is an independent tool to help the public research and track the activities in the U.S. Congress, promoting government transparency and civic education through novel uses of technology.
|
|
![]() |
| Dan Keppen, former executive director of the Klamath Water Users Association, stands on the shore of Upper Klamath Lake. H&N photo by Ty Beaver |
Before that, he worked for the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, the agency in charge of the Project, and was in an agency office when the decision to shut off the water was made. Never before had such a decision been made.
“I remember, just internally, that all the Reclamation people were shocked,” he said.
The next three and a half years
contained more than their fair share
of tension, anger and strife. Water
was eventually restored to the
Project, but there was a massive
fish die-off in 2002. Along with the
“Those two incidents were the catalysts for so much,” Keppen said.
Litigation and attacks through the
media became commonplace during
Keppen’s
Keppen said Project irrigators
considered several ways to bring
more certainty, and settlement was
their last option. None of the
others — including working oneon-one
with PacifiCorp and forming a public
utility district — panned
“It got to the point that we thought we better be at the table in these discussions with (the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission),” Keppen said.
While settlement was last option,
Keppen believes it needed to happen.
Since the talks, relations between
groups that once hated each other
have improved, and there’s more
certainty for the Project.
Keppen isn’t with Klamath Water Users Association anymore, and he knows work still needs to be done on the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement, especially to address the concerns of off-Project irrigators. But he’s happy with the progress that’s been made.
“Overall, I just
think working together is a better
approach than fighting each other,”
he said.