|
|
![]() |
| Barbra Martin raises her arms and cheers as she goes over the fence at
the A Canal headgates in |
The
water crisis in summer 2001 was a time no one wants to relive.
That
summer — dubbed the Summer of Struggle — was when the U.S. Bureau of
Reclamation cut off irrigation water to 180,000 acres of pasture and
farmlands, a decision that impacted farmers and ranchers and rippled
through the entire region, both socially and economically.
Ever
since, people fret when winter seems too long coming. Skiers still pray
for snow, but so does everyone else who experienced that summer of
tensions, when a sparse snowpack translated to low water levels in
The
water cutoffs were, and weren’t, a surprise.
Federal agencies signaled problems in February 2001 when they said
drought conditions could mean water would go to fish, not farmers. When
the skies proved relatively dry in February and March, and lake levels
dropped below what biologists said was necessary for coho salmon and
shortnose and
Shock, then anger
When the announcement came April 6 — no water for
irrigators — the
immediate
reaction was quiet shock. The anger came later, and loudly. In the
months that followed, no two days were the same.
Sen. Gordon Smith and Rep. Greg Walden seemed to take
up residence. Gov. John Kitzhaber, a more reluctant visitor, was
verbally abused when he visited
Bucket Brigade
The anger was channeled, literally, in May for the
Bucket Brigade. Thousands of people, including Walden and Smith, lined
Relief came July 24 when Interior Secretary Gale Norton announced some
water could be released because lake levels were higher than predicted.
A day later, the gates opened and allowed irrigation water to flow
through the A Canal.
Then Klamath Falls Police Lt. Jack Redfield, wearing a
uniform and surrounded by other officers (who were unaware of
Redfield’s intentions), said “an extremely violent response” was
likely if environmentalists continued efforts to protect the endangered
species. The marshals, who had been scheduled to leave, stayed.
out
the summer as farmers gathered and camped near the A Canal headgates.
Tension rose when protesters decided signs and quiet vigils weren’t
enough. In late June, people began climbing fences and illegally opening
the gates.
Klamath Tea
Party
Tensions ramped higher July 4, the day known as the
Klamath Tea Party. Protesters, shielded by a human wall, again cut open
the gates. Ten days later government officials called in federal
marshals. The once-cordial atmosphere eroded to serious confrontations
that many feared would lead to violence.
Bucket remains
Several water users suffered severe economic losses
and, worse, bankruptcy. The last major visible expression came in
August, when a convoy of supporters from around the West paraded into
During the ongoing crisis, federal government
employees were targeted. One store put up signs telling government
workers they weren’t welcome. Some took to not wearing uniforms, and
not driving government rigs.
Oddly, it took the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11 to
finally end the water crisis. The headgates camp was disbanded and the
federal marshals departed.
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
The
2001 water crisis
January
—
Lack of snowfall presages another drought. As winter wanes, stream and
snowpack conditions predict a serious shortage of water.
February
—
Klamath Project officials warn farmers that a drought may leave them
without water.
Feb. 22
—
Federal officials declare a drought.
March 1
—
Project manager Karl Wirkus announces irrigating water may not be
available.
March 9
—
Project farmers stage a rally at the Bureau of Reclamation offices. More
than 400 participate. Environmentalists file notice they will sue if
water is diverted to farms.
March 13
—
A new biological opinion from the wildlife service calls for a minimum
elevation in
March 19
—
A new biological opinion calls for increased flows below Iron Gate Dam
to protect coho salmon habitat.
March 21
—
Sen. Gordon Smith chairs a congressional hearing to review the new
biological opinions.
March 26
—
Federal officials meet in
March 29
—
Oregon Gov. John Kitzhaber declares a drought and asks Secretary of
Agriculture to provide emergency aid.
March 30
—
Sen. Gordon Smith asks President Bush to help resolve the dilemma.
March 31
—
The Klamath Project’s 2000 operating plan expires.
April 1-2
—
Interior Department, Klamath Project officials and scientists from the
National Marine Fisheries Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service are
called to
April 3
—
Rep. Greg Walden, Sen. Gordon Smith and Sen. Ron Wyden request aid.
April 4
—
A district court judge rules the Klamath Project is in violation of the
Endangered Species Act and cannot deliver irrigating water. The judge
also declares the Hardy Phase I report the “best available science”
for protecting coho salmon. No water for Klamath Project.
April 6
—
The Department of Interior announces that no irrigation water will be
available from
April 7
—
Sen. Gordon Smith comes to
April 12
—
Oregon Gov. John Kitzhaber and various local,
May 7
—
Thousands of people line
June 13
—
American Land Conservancy offers a plan to buy farm land and take it out
of production.
June 16
—
Six Republican members of the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on
Resources listen to testimony on the Endangered Species Act at the
June 30
—
Unknown people/person illegally opens the A Canal headgates, beginning
several days of opening and closing of the gates.
July 4
—
The Klamath Tea Party. Protesters cut open the gates to the A Canal
headgate area, beginning a summer-long confrontation between protesters
and authorities.
July 14
—
Federal marshals move in to control the headgates.
July 21
—
Klamath County Sheriff Tim Evinger tells marshals they should leave, but
they don’t.
July 24
—
Interior Secretary Gale Norton announces that some water can be released
from
July 25
—
Water finally begins to flow, legally, into the A Canal. A speech at the
A Canal headgates by Klamath Falls Police Lt. Jack Redfield warning of
“an extremely violent response” against environmentalists causes a
furor.
Aug. 20
—
Hundreds of vehicles from several states parade through
Sept. 13
—
A truce is called because the nation’s and world’s attention is
focused on the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
Compiled
from Bureau of Reclamation and Herald & News archives:
1826:
Peter
Skene Ogden, fur trapper, enters the
1840s:
Settlers
begin to move west to
1882: Farmers begin irrigating in the
The
Linkville Water Ditch Company is incorporated and a shallow canal is dug
connecting Linkville town lots to
1886:
J.
Frank Adams completes a six-mile canal from the
1887:
Charles
and Rufus Moore excavate a canal on the west side of the
1888:
The
Linkville ditch is taken over by the Klamath Falls Irrigation Company
and turned into a highcapacity canal known as the
1902: Congress passes the Reclamation Act.
The
U.S. Reclamation Service becomes the Bureau of Reclamation.
1903:
John
T. Whistler, Oregon District engineer of the U.S. Reclamation Service,
recommends a dam at the mouth of
1904:
Reclamation
Service Director Fredrick H. Newell visits the
1904-05:
Residents
petition the government for a project.
1905:
Approval
of the Klamath Project requires
Restraint
was tested throughfor $337,500, but owners of the Klamath Canal Co. hold
out for $200,000 for their rights. Reclamation officials doubt the value
and legality of their claim and order them not to divert any water, but
the company does so anyway. Reclamation obtains a temporary restraining
order. The dispute between the company and the Reclamation Service marks
the first legal battle over who gets water and who doesn’t in the
Reclamation
agrees to pay Hawkins, Brown and Gold $150,000 for their rights and
interest in the Klamath Canal Company. The Project begins.
After
1906: Construction begins on the A Canal using horse teams.
Heavy
snows and wet weather delay construction.
1907:
Construction
on the A Canal headworks is completed by June. Work begins on the East
Branch (B) Canal and
1908:
President
Teddy Roosevelt establishes the Lower Klamath National Wildlife Refuge,
the nation’s first waterfowl refuge. Construction begins on the South
Branch (C) Canal. The canal requires a 4,300-foot flume across the
1909:
Austrians,
Montenegrins and Serbians continue construction on
1911:
Clear
Lake National Wildlife Refuge established. Construction begins on the
Lost River Diversion Dam and Lost River Diversion Channel.
1912:
Reclamation
begins experimental farms in drained
1917:
175
homesteaders file for 42 tracts of land.
1920:
Construction
begins on the Link River Dam July 29 at the mouth of
1921:
Construction
begins on the Lower Lost River Diversion Dam (Anderson-Rose Dam) and the
J Canal to serve the Tulelake area.
1922:
1924:
Construction
begins on the Miller Diversion Dam, Gerber Dam and
1925:
Potatoes
and alfalfa become important Basin crops.
1926:
Horsefly,
1928:
1935:
Two
Civilian Conservation Corps work camps are established on the Klamath
Project. In the 1920s and 30s, Reclamation widens and lines existing
canals, replaces the C Canal wooden flume with a concrete one, and
expands and modifies Clear Lake Dam.
1940:
Construction
begins on the
1941:
Pumping
plant D is built to lift water from
1946:
Lands
for relocation camps are returned to the Project. A second wave of
homestead entries attracts World War II veterans.
1956:
The
Federal Energy Regulatory licenses a series of dams on the
1957: The
The
Klamath Forest National Wildlife Refuge is established.
1962:
1964:
Passage
of the Kuchel Act ends homesteading and dedicates the remaining Project
acres to the other major purpose of waterfowl management, but with full
consideration to optimum agricultural use. The law enrolls 17,000 acres
on
1970:
The
National Environmental Policy Act is passed, requiring federal agencies
to analyze the impact of their actions on the land.
1973: The Endangered Species Act is passed. 1975:
1977:
A
drought strikes the
1978:
The
bald eagle is declared a threatened species on Feb. 14.
1988: The
From
1989 to 2001, a series of biological opinions repeatedly find the
Project jeopardizes the suckers. Also during the 1990s, the roles of the
Bureau of Reclamation and Army Corps of Engineers are first called into
question with publication of “
1992:
A
drought focuses attention on the role of lake levels in protecting
sucker habitat. The wildlife service recommends Upper Klamath Lake be
kept above a minimum elevation of 4,139 feet during summer months,
although it allowed that the lake could drop to as low as 4,137 feet in
four out of 10 years. Other steps are recommended, including fish
ladders, screens and a sucker salvage program to remove suckers each
fall when canals are drained and return them to the lake. For the first
time in the Klamath Reclamation Project’s history, irrigation
deliveries are curtailed.
April 1993:
A
final recovery plan for suckers is approved by the wildlife service.
1994:
A
second drought hits the
With
salmon stocks dwindling, commercial fishing for coho salmon is halted
from
U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service proposes a rule defining critical sucker
habitat in Clear Lake Reservoir.
1995:
Reclamation
begins operating according to an annual plan.
1995-1997:
Large
numbers of suckers die in a series of fish kills.
1996:
Reclamation
agrees to meet minimum instream flows below Iron Gate Dam to protect
habitat for anadromous fish.
During
the 1990s, scientists studying the lake begin to focus on the roles of
algae, nutrients, temperature, ammonia and alkalinity in triggering
periodic die-offs of suckers.
1996:
An
Interior Department solicitor published a legal opinion that water for
Native American tribal trust obligations and endangered species take
precedence over deliveries of irrigation water to farmers and wildlife
refuges.
Coho
salmon are listed as a threatened species.
1998-99:
Winter
storms bury
1999:
Critical
habitat is defined for the coho. On July 12, a biological opinion from
the National Marine Fisheries Service concludes project operations would
affect, but not likely jeopardize, coho.
A
controversial study by Thomas Hardy, a
1995 - 2001:
As
scientists learn more about suckers and the lake, they begin to suspect
that fish die-offs entail more factors than previously known and begin
to call for higher lake levels. After 1997, Reclamation operates the
project to maintain the level of
2000:
At
a conference of environmental groups and wildlife refuge officials,
Klamath Project farmers announce they are willing to sell as much as
30,000 acres of farm land, following four years of profitless growing.
Imperial Holly announces it will no longer contract to grow sugar beets,
a major Basin crop, in
In
autumn, Congress approves the Klamath Basin Water Supply Initiative. It
authorizes the Bureau of Reclamation to study ways to improve water
storage and quality in the Basin. Potato farmers, hit by another
profitless season, seek to have the federal government buy a portion of
their crop for dumping.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those
who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go
to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Source: http://pioneer.olivesoftware.com/Daily/Skins/heraldandnews/
navigator.asp?skin=heraldandnews