Changing temps will impact Basin
Study: Snow pack, river flows declining, more drought conditions
expected
Rising temperatures over the
past five decades
have decreased summer flows to the Upper Klamath River by 38
percent, and as those temperatures continue to increase, the
Klamath Basin can expect
less snow pack and more drought conditions.
The predictions, from a
report released Tuesday
by the Oregon Climate Change
Research Institute, are based on temperature increases
nationwide
and the resulting impact on
area ecosystems — weather, water, agriculture, forests and
public health.
In the Klamath Basin, that
means droughts, such as the one that caused the 2001 water
crisis, will be exacerbated and groundwater systems won’t be
adequately restored because of less runoff, researchers said.
Data from the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Association shows the
nation is experiencing the
highest high temperatures and lowest lows it has seen in 100
years. And those extremes are increasing each year.
Nationwide, October was the
11th warmest on record, NOAA reported, with temperatures 2.1
degrees higher than the 100 -year average and precipitation 0.26
inches lower.
Higher temperatures in part
are caused by carbon
dioxide, which comes from burning fossil fuels like coal, oil
and natural gas. As that pollutant lingers in the atmosphere, it
traps heat, increasing global temperatures.
While 2 degrees doesn’t seem
like much, it compounds over time, researchers said, and
eventually it will make the difference between freezing and
above freezing temperatures — snow versus rain.
In the report, researchers
predict that Oregon’s water
supply will decrease, wildfires will increase, and ecosystems
will alter as temperatures rise.
“Weather is
hard to predict,” said Roger Hamilton, a senior policy analyst
for the Climate Leadership Initiative and Langell Valley
rancher. “But climate change is a statistical expectation …
where we can say with some certainty that this is going to
happen 30 years out.”
Current predictions show in
40 years, local water resources would be stressed more than they
already are. Higher-than average temperatures mean less snow
pack, which leads to less storage to replenish water bodies and
underground aquifers.
For farmers and ranchers,
that means less water to irrigate with.
The Climate Leadership
Initiative group last month said low-flow irrigation systems and
drought-proof crops would help counter the effects of climate
change.
T.J. Woodley, director of
the Klamath Soil and Water Conservation District, a government
organization that helps landowners implement conservation
projects, said looking at long-term
sustainable agriculture
practices is not just socially responsible, “it’s just good
business.”
Some local growers already
have implemented water and power conservation methods as a way
to save money and reduce water use.
Randy and Debi Wallace
received the district’s Beginning Farmer award at its annual
dinner for their energy conservation work. They installed
efficient irrigation systems and managed irrigation practices,
like watering according to wind schedules so they didn’t lose
water to wind.
“With the water issues we
have, I’m not sure how much water I’m going to have. The more
efficient we are the less water we
use,” said Debi Wallace, who
has been farming for two years in the Merrill area. “I’m trying
to reduce pumping costs so I can actually make a profit.”
In addition to producing
alfalfa, alfalfa grass mix and 16 cattle, the Wallaces planted
drought-resistant winter wheat, which grows during the wet
winter and spring so they water it only a few times. Most
farmers in the Basin grow spring wheat.
Longtime farmer Dan Chin
received the district’s Diversified Farmer award for his efforts
to improve irrigation efficiency on his farm. For the past 10
years, his operation has gradually added pivots, pumps, and
other equipment.
“If we’re more efficient
with our water usage, obviously we’re going to use less water,
we’re going to use less power, and power is very expensive now,”
said Chin, owner of Wong Potatoes. Since too much or too little
water stresses crops, “the more efficient you are with
irrigation, the better quality your crops are.
“There are good benefits to
irrigation efficiency,” he said.
Irrigation equipment is
expensive, so he buys what he can afford from the previous
year’s profits. With less production so less profit this year,
his efficiency improvements will likely be limited to nozzles,
he said.