|
|
![]() |
|
Improving
water quality along the |
“It’s
a historic opportunity here,” Chichizola says of the Klamath Basin
Restoration Agreement, especially because it calls for removal of four
“The
dams are our main issue. There’s a definite need for some group
outside the settlement to take on the toxic water issues.”
Klamath
Riverkeeper is involved with the Waterkeeper Alliance, a national
environmental group led by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. that connects and
supports local waterkeeper groups. The groups also work on legal issues
and are funded by members and private foundations. The Klamath group has
two riverkeepers, Chichizola in
Chichizola, 30, moved to far
Klamath Riverkeeper did not participate in settlement
talks. The group was formed while the agreement discussions were in
progress. So they’re not taking a position on whether it should be
approved. Regardless of what happens, Chichizola believes the agreement
can be used to improve the river’s water quality.
“There are just a lot of applications to restore the
water quality that aren’t so controversial,” she says, citing
ongoing efforts by the Klamath Riverkeeper organization and the state of
She also believes a greater understanding of diseases
that she says are causing the deaths of 80 percent of young salmon is
necessary.
“The disease issues are really intense.” She
suspects high mortality rates may be connected to water quality issues.
Chichizola thinks a major emphasis should be dams.
“We feel like our focus needs to be what
PacifiCorp’s responsibility is,” she says.
She notes that many people living along the river lack
electrical service; and she worries that leaving the dams in place will
actually cost ratepayers more than if dams are removed.
“It’s not just the farmers versus the Indians.”
Side Bar
What
she likes:
Klamath
Riverkeeper Executive Director Regina Chichizola says the proposal is
positive because “everyone is coming together to work things out.”
She’s
hopeful that dam removal will lead to better water quality and possibly
eventually allow salmon to return to the
Her
organization is reviewing the proposal, but will not take a position.
“There are issues we have with the settlement but we will let our
independent legal review address those.”
What she dislikes:
“I’m a little uncomfortable because at this point the farmers have
set (water) allocations and the tribes do not.”
She
also believes the focus on the Endangered Species Act does not make
sense because it emphasizes some fish species while not addressing
others. In addition, Chichizola believes a greater emphasis needs to be
placed on how the proposals will impact “the regular public.”
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those
who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go
to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Source: http://pioneer.olivesoftware.com/Daily/Skins/heraldandnews/
navigator.asp?skin=heraldandnews