By TY BEAVER
H&N Staff Writer
CHILOQUIN — Klamath County sheriff’s
deputies were at the Klamath Tribes’ administrative offices in Chiloquin
Monday to keep the peace between two political factions fighting for
control of the Tribes.
About 15 people attempted to have
tribal council members removed from their offices, claiming the elected
tribal officials were recalled and new members were voted into office.
The tribal government said the
group’s election was invalid, and the U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs sent
a letter to the tribal government and the sheriff’s office stating the
group’s actions were illegal.
“We’re going to go along with
business as usual,” said
Taylor David, spokeswoman for the Tribes.
Sheriff Tim Evinger said deputies
were not present to enforce tribal law, but to be on hand in case there
was some kind of altercation between the two groups.
“We’re there as a proactive measure
to keep the peace,” he said.
David said problems first arose
Saturday during the Tribes’ general council meeting. Soon after it
started, several people in the audience began calling for a recall of
the elected tribal council and for a new election. Chairman Joe
Kirk ended the meeting because of the disturbance, David said.
Those upset with the council members
remained afterward and voted to recall the council and
elected those among them to replace them. Those newly elected officials
then showed up Monday at the tribal offices.
One known member of the opposition
group is Janice Miller, a current tribal council member, but attempts by
the Herald and News to reach her for comment Monday at her tribal office
headquarters were unsuccessful. No other phone number was listed for
Miller, and David could not provide a contact number.
No arrests were made Monday, and
Evinger said both factions were civil and respectful. He sent a few
deputies, a patrol commander and a detective to Chiloquin to monitor the
situation.
David said the group thought because
it had more than 50 people present during its recall election — the
quorum required for the tribal general council to make decisions — it
could make decisions, but it couldn’t because it was not an official
meeting and the vote violated tribal election procedures and timetables.
Tribal council members are elected
to three year terms. Tribal elections were last in 2007 and are
scheduled to take place again in 2010.
“It’s honestly comical in a sense
that they think they can supersede our constitution and our tribal
laws,” David said.
There are a number of
reasons why people are upset with the tribal council, David said,
including how the Tribes issues its per capita payments to members.
Those payments are made annually and derived from tribal revenues.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who
have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml