|
Become a friend of the Klamath Bucket Brigade All donations are tax deductible |
|
This Website is Dedicated to Alvin Alexander Cheyne January 10, 1921 - June 17, 2005 |
GovTrack.us is an independent tool to help the public research and track the activities in the U.S. Congress, promoting government transparency and civic education through novel uses of technology.
County to skip water meeting
Commissioners won’t attend session, based on legal advice
Klamath County commissioners won’t attend a Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement meeting in Sacramento this week on advice of legal counsel.
Commissioners John Elliott and Bill Brown both considered attending the meeting that begins today, but decided not to attend at the recommendation of county counsel Dan Bunch. Bunch said he was concerned about conditions of the meeting, specifically how elected officials can be held to a confidentiality agreement.
“This process is not the medium for public officials to be discussing this,” he said.
Stakeholders
from groups representing irrigation,
fishing, tribal and government
interests have met regularly for
years in closed meetings. In January
2008, the group publicly released
the Klamath Basin Restoration
Agreement as a way to address water
issues in the Basin.
The agreement, among other conditions, calls for removal of four hydroelectric dams on the Klamath River. Government officials and representatives of PacifiCorp, which owns the dams, signed a tentative agreement in November to move toward dam removal.
Elliott was a member of the stakeholder group, representing Klamath County, and attended meetings in the past.
Brown said last week he might attend the meeting to raise concerns about dam removal and other aspects of the agreement that haven’t been addressed. He added that he may not go because the group’s confidentiality agreement would prevent him from sharing information with county residents.
Bunch said he heard the meeting could involve discussion of litigation involving Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the ongoing Klamath Basin water adjudication, two issues the county isn’t involved in.
He also said he has questions about a commissioner being held to an unclear confidentiality agreement, considering the strict rules on public meetings and open records laws they must follow.
The recommendation doesn’t preclude the commissioners from attending future meetings, but Bunch advises they don’t attend until the legal questions are answered.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml