






|
Become a friend of
the Klamath Bucket
Brigade
Send
Donations Here
All donations are tax
deductible
|
|
This Website is Dedicated to
Alvin Alexander Cheyne
January
10, 1921 - June 17, 2005
|

GovTrack.us is an independent tool to help the public
research and track the activities in the U.S. Congress, promoting
government transparency and civic education through novel uses of
technology.
|
|

Critical habitat: Providing
safe havens for fish
By JILL
AHO
H&N
Staff Writer
September 13, 2009
On Dec. 1, 1994,
a proposal for designating critical habitat for the
endangered Lost River and shortnose suckers was
published in the Federal Register. Critical habitat
is defined as all areas essential to the recovery of
a species to the point of delisting.
Designating
critical habitat is meant to identify areas that
have habitat features essential to the recovery of a
species, regardless of whether the areas are
currently occupied by a species. It makes agencies
and the public more aware of the importance of an
area, according to information from the Federal
Register.
“The idea behind
any critical habitat designation is you’re providing
a safe haven for listed fish,” said Ani Kame’enui,
the Klamath campaign coordinator for Oregon Wild.
Oregon Wild sued the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
in 1993 to finish critical habitat designation for
the suckers.
“The idea is
you’re creating a specific area for this fish that
can operate as an area that they will not be
adversely affected by their surroundings,”
Kame’enui said.
The designation
of critical habitat does not, however, automatically
prohibit certain actions, establish population goals
or prescribe specific management actions. It can
potentially increase knowledge about a species’
needs by focusing research efforts within the
critical habitats. The designation affects solely
federally issued permits and federally funded
projects.
Included in the
proposal were portions of both current and historic
habitat for the sucker. Because water quality and
quantity are part of critical habitat, areas
affecting water quality were
included. Sites such as Pelican Bay, which provides
a refuge for the fish during times of poor water
quality, and areas within 300 feet of either bank of
streams known to be used by suckers, would fall
under this provision.
The areas
identified for inclusion are Clear Lake and its
watershed, Tule Lake and the Lost River, the Klamath
River from Iron Gate Dam up to the Link River Dam,
Upper Klamath Lake and its watershed (excluding
Williamson and Sprague rivers, but including Agency
Lake), the Williamson and Sprague rivers extending
from the mouth of the Williamson River and up the
Sprague River to
its confluence with Brown Creek and Gerber Reservoir
and its watershed. Excluded are the Bureau of
Reclamation canals.
“We haven’t seen
the final designation, but there was some thought
that the final might be slightly smaller than
the proposed
critical habitat,” Kame’enui said.
Mark Buettner, a biologist with the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, said the
finalization is likely to occur after the recovery
plan is finished, perhaps in 2012.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section
107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or
payment to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this
information for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more
information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
|