|







|
Become a friend of
the Klamath Bucket
Brigade
Send
Donations Here
All donations are tax
deductible
|
|
This Website is Dedicated to
Alvin Alexander Cheyne
January
10, 1921 - June 17, 2005
|
|
|
Dam
study had dubious basis
May 25, 2008
Klamath Falls
Herald and
News Letter to the Editor
There
is an estimated 20 million cubic yards of sediment stored behind the
Klamath River
dams.
Siskiyou
County
had a consultant do a
preliminary analysis of the studies that had been done. The 2006 Klamath
River Dam and Sediment Study was not comprehensive, nor did it detail
negative impacts.
In fact, it listed a large group of additional studies that would need
to be done. The American Rivers study did not use the accepted
engineering model (HEC-RAS) for sediment transport or available detailed
topographic reservoir profiles.
The model used accounted for sand-sized sediment, when the majority is
silt-sized. The study is questionable. The
studies done by the California State Coastal Conservancy relied on the
defective American Rivers study. They failed to take into account that
no study had been done on how the flows will carry the sediment.
Dam
removal could raise the bed height of the river. (In the recent
decommissioning of Marmot dam with 955,000 cubic yards of stored
sediment and erosion of 131,000 cubic yards of sediment, the downstream
channel rose 13 feet.)
This could inundate adjacent land where there are homes and
infrastructure. The fine sediment could also be trapped in gravel
spawning beds, requiring a 100-year flood event to return them to a
suitable state for salmon.
A review of sediment bore samples showed some presence of ethylbenzene
and creosote compounds. Three bore samples taken in each of the
reservoirs indicated that the sediment contains dioxin. Two
samples were above human health standards. (You can read about that
toxin and its carcinogenic health impacts at www.ejnet.org/dioxin.
It is likely that the levels of dioxin could kill the “benthic
community” or bottom ecology of the river and that a large quantity of
floating organic toxic waste particles would pollute the mouth of the
estuary.
Marcia Armstrong
Fort Jones,
Calif.
Editor’s
note: The writer is the
Siskiyou
County
fifth district supervisor
and represents communities downriver from the dams.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those
who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go
to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Source:
http://www.heraldandnews.com/articles/2008/05/25/viewpoints/
letters/doc48390417cd9c2003274853.txt
|