
Discord
rumors in water talks just that
Participants
say uninvolved parties attempting to derail process
By
TY BEAVER
H&N
Staff Writer
August 14, 2007
Klamath River Settlement participants are striving to reach a
November deadline despite rumors of discord.
Those not involved in the negotiations are attempting to detract from
the process because they are not pleased with aspects of the settlement,
said several representatives.
No
one group will be completely pleased with the final settlement, they
acknowledged.
However, the settlement would allow rural, coastal and
tribal communities and wildlife to avoid crises such as the 2001
irrigation shutoff in the
Klamath
Basin
and the 2002 the salmon
die-off.
“We can have fishing and farming, but we have to sit
down and work at it,” said Craig Tucker, Klamath Campaign coordinator
for the Karuk Tribe.
Members
involved
The Klamath River Settlement group includes farmers
and tribal members as well as fishermen and environmentalists. The group
has met for months to settle regional water issues.
An article in Sunday’s Sacramento Bee indicated
there is discord caused by political manipulation by the Bush
administration to favor irrigators. It also said that PacifiCorp, the
original organizer of the negotiations, is no longer involved.
Those involved deny any manipulation of the talks by the White House,
and PacifiCorp, though not actively participating in talks right now, is
still a part of the process.
Greg Addington, executive director of the Klamath
Water Users Association, said some groups that are throwing stones in an
attempt to disrupt the negotiations.
He also said irrigators along with other groups would
have to make sacrifices as part of the settlement.
He declined to say what those sacrifices could be,
citing a confidentiality agreement.
“It’s tough decisions, and some people are just
coming to that realization,” he said.
PacifiCorp is still “in the loop,” but are not
actively involved in the discussions at the moment. Certain aspects of
the settlement do not concern them, and they do not need to be involved
while those issues are discussed, Addington said.
A representative with Portland-based PacifiCorp said
the company is still active in the process.
“We do still feel the settlement process is a good
way to reach agreements,” said Jan Mitchell, PacifiCorp media
representative.
PacificCorp plans to have meetings with other groups
involved within the next few weeks.
Latest
difficulties
This is the latest set of difficulties facing the
group since it started negotiations last year.
In June and July, Congress investigated Vice President
Dick Cheney’s potential political involvement in restoring irrigation
water in the Basin after the 2001 water crisis.
No longer endangered
Also in July, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
reclassified one of two species of suckers in the Basin as
“threatened” instead of “endangered.” Klamath Tribe officials
criticized the timing of the decision as settlement negotiations moved
closer to a conclusion.
Tucker said it shouldn’t be surprising to hear
detractors as negotiations come closer to a conclusion. He is bothered
by rumors that the White House hijacked the settlement process, saying
there is no evidence to back them up.
Those involved in the settlement are split on whether
the November deadline is still feasible. Tucker believes the deadline
can be met.
Addington said if the November deadline is missed, a
settlement would come soon after.
“By the end of the year, we I expect to have some
sort of conclusion,” he said.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those
who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go
to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Source: http://pioneer.olivesoftware.com/Daily/skins/HeraldandNews/
navigator.asp?skin=heraldandnews&AW=1187101852406
|