 |
|
||
Klamath Falls Herald and News
By DYLAN DARLING
MODOC POINT - Federal and Modoc Point Irrigation
District officials will keep talking about removing Chiloquin Dam.
"We are continuing to negotiate," said Barney Allen, district
vice-president.
The district's board ratified Tuesday night a vote by
its landowners to continue discussions with the Bureau of Indian Affairs. The
vote was held Friday and the resolution passed by nine votes.
Federal officials, scientists and lawmakers have supported removal of the
91-year-old dam that sits on the Sprague River near Chiloquin, but the district
owns it and controls its fate.
Of the 86 landowners in the 5,300-acre district, 47 voted. In the district, the
more land someone has, the more pull they had in the election.
The breakdown is like this: Owners of less than an acre to 40 acres got one
vote; more than 40 acres to 160 acres got two votes and more than 160 acres got
three.
Of the 119 eligible ballots, 79 were cast Friday - 44 "yes" and 35
"no."
Although the ballots have been counted, the issue of whether the district should
have the dam removed isn't settled.
Pete Bourdet, who has been representing the district in negotiations with the government, said once agreements are in place to put in a pumping station to supply water to the district and remove the dam there will be another vote of the landowners to see if the majority support the plans.
"It won't happen until all the agreements are in
place," Bourdet said. "They'll vote up or down, whatever the case may
be."
Currently, the district gets all of its water from the dam's diversion ditch.
While Bourdet, who was voted into the district board's vacant fifth seat Tuesday
night, will continue talks with the government, district members who oppose the
dam's removal will continue to ask questions.
A number of those who voted "no" and oppose
the removal of the dam were among the 16 people at Tuesday night's board meeting
at the Crater Lake Realty office on Highway 97 near the Williamson River. Among
them was Bill Boyd, who had been on the district board, but resigned a couple of
months ago because of differences with other board members.
Boyd questioned why the government wants the dam removed.
"What bothers me is this is just a political scam
and the district is taking the brunt," he said.
Melinda Chauvin, a district member who lives half the time in Medford, said she
is still concerned about putting in the pump, which would be on the Williamson
River and not the Sprague, because she says it would jeopardize the district's
water rights claims in the ongoing state adjudication, or the processing of
determining who gets how much water.
Bourdet, who is the district's largest landowner with
1,000 acres, said if the district doesn't get its water rights then it won't
enter into an agreement with the feds to remove the dam.
Bourdet said he is working on a deal that would have the federal government
cover the cost of putting in the dam, its upkeep and a yearly $55,000 power
bill.
The pump would be put in before the dam is removed and
the district would try it out for three months, before approving the removal of
the dam.
"We don't sign, the dam doesn't come out," Bourdet said.
