|
|
![]() |
| Flocks
of geese fly in to dine on Jim Aston’s pasture near |
Migratory
birds, such as geese, cause thousands of dollars worth of damage to
farmers’ crops each year.
Foraging
migratory birds like white fronts and coots are among the bandits.
Merrill-Tulelake
farmer Steve Kandra farms next to national wildlife refuges and said
foraging migratory birds, such as white fronts, Ross and coots, reduce
his annual production by about one ton per acre.
Their
browsing affects not only the first cuttings of alfalfa, but also the
second and third cuttings, he said. The damage to hay and alfalfa crops
alone amounts to about $180 per acre, Kandra said, totaling between
$15,000 and $18,000 for his 100 acres.
For
cereal crops, like wheat, which are experiencing record high prices, the
damage could be around a $300 per acre loss, Kandra said.
Tom
Collom, district wildlife biologist with the Oregon Department of Fish
and Wildlife, said the winter wheat fields are the “real ice- cream to
geese,” adding that wheat fields and new seeding alfalfa fields see
the worst damage.
Important
damage
Dave
Mauser, a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service biologist, estimated 70 to 75
percent of migratory spring geese were supported by agriculture.
“It
should be apparent to everybody that it’s the private lands that are
supporting, for the most part, these spring goose populations,” he
said. “Birds don’t respect property lines.”
The
latest figures for birds in the Basin included 280,000 snow geese,
238,000 white fronts and 52,000 coots.
The
Here,
Mauser said, the white fronts fuel up for a non-stop flight to
“The food and energy they get here is pretty
critical for that flight,” he said.
During this northern migration, which lasts from May
to late August, the white fronts have to build nests, lay eggs and raise
a clutch just in time to fly south again. The
Credit sought
While the birds cause a good deal of damage, Kandra
said he understands the role agriculture fields play in supporting the
migratory fowl.
“Feeding migratory birds is what I call a duty and a
joy, an opportunity and an obligation,” he said.
But, he added, he would like credit for what his
fields are providing for wildlife. One way would include monetary
compensation, but Kandra would be happy to change a common belief that
agriculture is adverse to wildlife. Farmers’ help to the birds could
instead be taken into account with water allocation, because water used
for fields benefits wildlife.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material herein is distributed without profit or payment to those
who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for
non-profit
research and educational purposes only. For more information go
to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Source: http://pioneer.olivesoftware.com/Daily/Skins/heraldandnews/
navigator.asp?skin=heraldandnews